A lot of the fun went out of racing Sunday afternoon when there was a NASCAR-style "big one" in the IndyCar race at Las Vegas Motor Speedway. It happened in a heartbeat and was over almost as fast.
The sport lost English driver Dan Wheldon in that crash. He died of massive head injuries.
A NASCAR pileup can be fun to watch because it’s like bumper cars at the Ex. This is because the death of Dale Earnhardt at Daytona 10 years ago forced NASCAR to take a hard look at the design of its cars. The "Car of Tomorrow" that they race now is so much safer. It’s almost guaranteed that a driver will walk away from a trip into a wall at 180 miles an hour.
Will Wheldon’s accident prove to be IndyCar’s wakeup call?
Before too many people start pointing fingers, and despite IndyCar’s somewhat poor officiating record this season, there is no way anyone can be directly blamed for what happened Sunday. Nobody could have seen that coming.
The drivers are saying after the fact that they had warned series officials that there could be a problem. But nobody said anything in public – so far as I know – and they got into their cars Sunday and went out there to race just like they always do.
In fact, Wheldon was bubbling with enthusiasm while talking from his cockpit during the warmup laps with ABC announcer Scott Goodyear. Wheldon was the network’s “in-race reporter” and told Goodyear how he was looking forward to trying to win a $5 million bonus he’d be paid if he won the race from his last-place starting position.
And, in fact, he’d used his Twitter account when the race started to illustrate his excitement at going racing. His Tweet?
“GREEN!!!”
Having said that, it quickly became apparent that the cars were going way too fast for the size of the Las Vegas facility. Within a lap or two, the cars were three-wide and sometimes four-wide down the straights. It might be okay to go 220 miles an hour at the 2.5-mile Indianapolis Motor Speedway but those speeds were over the top on a 1.5-mile oval.
Canadian racer James Hinchcliffe came right to the point: "There is zero margin for error."
NASCAR uses restrictor plates to slow down the cars on super-fast speedways. So, should IndyCar consider something similar to slow down the cars at some venues?
Or, with the exception of Indianapolis or other 2.5-mile speedways like Michigan or California, should IndyCar leave the ovals behind and just race on street circuits or road courses where “pack racing” at 220 mph isn’t possible?
Open-cockpit racing is extremely dangerous. Former double world champion John Surtees (F1 and motorcycles) lost his son Henry when the teen was hit on the helmet by a wheel that came off his car in a crash. Jeff Krosnoff was killed at the 1996 Molson Indy when his car went cockpit-first into a light pole. Greg Moore lost his life in a CART race at California in 1999 when he, too, went head-first into a wall. (Greg’s dad, Ric Moore, was at the Vegas race Sunday and consoled Dario Franchitti, his son’s great friend.)
There are open-wheel series that have roll cages protecting the cockpits – midgets, sprint cars and super-modifieds. Might a roll cage have helped Wheldon? Should IndyCar consider something similar?
Wheldon was racing for a $5 million bonus. Should that sort of bonus, or bounty, ever be offered again?
There were so many cars out there – 34, the biggest field of the year and more cars than start the Indy 500 – that the track was very crowded and some of the drivers were not sufficiently experienced to be driving that fast on that type of banked speedway.
Should IndyCar take a look at its driver licencing system? Even on a race-by-race basis? And how about capping the number of cars that can start? That could vary from track-to-track also.
Wheldon was testing the 2012 car that will replace the current chassis next season. It has fenders over the rear wheels that some say might have prevented Wheldon’s car from “taking off.” But the exposed front wheels were actually what caused Wheldon’s car to ride up over the spinning car in front of him.
Should the front wheels of Indy cars have fenders too?
So many questions – and perhaps there will never be any answers.
But when it comes to racing, there should never be anything that smacks of complacency. A horrible thing happened on Sunday: a husband was killed, as was a son and a father.
We – and by "we," I mean everybody involved in the sport – has to do something other than pray that it will never happen again.
As it stands right now, in order to fill out the schedule with the appropriate number of events and considering the organizations limited options with oval tracks that are willing to take on an "Indy" race, they will somehow have to make adjustments when racing on these high banked, high speed ovals that were designed specifically for stock cars. As Norris stated in his article, NASCAR learned that many years ago when average speeds started to creep up over 200mph. Accidents occurred in which the cars sometimes went airborne, so they introduced restrictor plate racing to slow the cars down on tracks like Talladega and Daytona where they usually have 40 or more cars in the event! The fact is, once you start running a consistent average of over 200 mph throughout the race(and I don't care how sophisticated the design), you are essentially aiming these things not driving them and,as we have seen, in a pack it can be disastrous. A human is driving these cars and just doesn't have the reaction capability to deal with problems at these speeds, should they arise. As a long-term motorsport fan and when attending a race, I really don't know the difference between 190 and 220mph and quite frankly, with any form of racing, I am much more interested in the competition, not the speeds and should there be an accident, I want the driver to be able to get out of the car on their own, not on a stretcher.
Posted by: Ron W | 10/17/2011 at 11:41 AM
Rest In Peace Dan Wheldon. Indycar racing will never be the same without you.
Posted by: Tumbleweed | 10/17/2011 at 11:46 AM
Too many cars on too short a track with slow drivers intermingled with fast and skilled drivers held prisoner to the the skills of the lowest common denominator. A recipe for disaster.
Posted by: Peter | 10/17/2011 at 12:06 PM
Hi Norris. I'm a firm believer Indycar should just get out of ovals period. It's for the bump and grind Nascar style racing not the finesse of open wheel. At those speeds, bad things happen.
I watched Dale Earnhart crash and he was busy blocking those behind him that were lined up 3 abreast through the corner to protect jr.'s first place position and sure enough one of them tapped him and up he went into the wall. Earnhart put himself into that dangerous position and paid for it and officials looked at the car and equipment more than his driving style that caused the crash.
Posted by: Jayson Osmars | 10/17/2011 at 12:37 PM
Norris,
Please note that Henry Surtees was killed by the wheel from from another competitor's car, not his own. All the more cruel that Henry was the victim of someone else's crash.
Posted by: Greg W. | 10/17/2011 at 01:27 PM
Excellent piece. Very well done.
Posted by: Spencer Lewis | 10/17/2011 at 01:35 PM
My deepest condolenses to Dan's family, his wife and young children and to his racing famliy.
It is a terrible tragedy.
Posted by: Judy McCrory | 10/17/2011 at 04:04 PM
Is there a difference in the braking mechanisms of these cars on the oval tracks, or just the aerodynamics?
I essentially stopped watching oval racing when Greg Moore was killed in a 240 MPH accident. IndyCar spends less money developing cars, and has more inferior drivers than F1. They then put more of these drivers in a much smaller space at higher average speeds than F1, and surround them with concrete walls. It was only a matter of time until a tragedy like this occurred. American fans will never accept road racing as real racing because it's much harder to follow than a bunch of guys driving in a circle not using the brakes or the steering wheel for 4 hours. That's why IndyCar has to overload the schedule with oval races which aren't even interesting to most racing fans, but bring in the sponsorship dollars which come along with the casual channel flipper. North America is about minor league motorsports, just like it's about minor league soccer. We need to understand that, and turn IndyCar into an all road course series again, and feed F1 with drivers.
Posted by: brad | 10/17/2011 at 05:20 PM
I will never forget being at the Toronto Indycar race this past summer and pointing out to my son that the man walking alone (and unnoticed) in front of us had just won the 2011 Indy 500. In a crowd of thousands of "race fans", how is it that the winner of racing's equivalent of the Masters can walk through a crowd unrecognized from the Paddocks to the Grid on race day? Obviously, Dan Wheldon is not a household name in Canada but I was shocked that not a single double-take was registered. He wore no sunglasses or head cover and seemed sadly small in street clothes. This is not in any way a knock on Toronto people but rather a symptom of the fatal disease that Indycar will inevitably succumb to; Greed.
Tony George is to blame for the initial infection and dozens of others for its malignancy. From CEO, Operations Chief and marketers, to the 8-10 drivers that have no business anywhere near a big-league racetrack, yesterday's tragedy is on their heads. The poor bastard that was put at the back of the field at Las Vegas, in a Circus-like attempt to generate interest (the stands were empty), was the victim of this pathetic stunt and his family is paying for it.
The entire 2011 season seemed tainted by incompetence on and off the track. The many under qualified drivers, simply paying for a ride in a rental car, and the obvious stupidity of the people making decisions in the tower led to the death of Dan Wheldon in what can never be described as a "racing incident". This was a catastrophe at the hands of desperate businessmen.
Dan Wheldon is a hero as a world-class Champion open wheel race driver, end of story.
Posted by: Patrick Mahoney | 10/17/2011 at 05:40 PM
Everybody is an expert at times like this... sometimes terrible s--- happens to good people in spite of all improvements in safey and technology. To be completely free of risk is a pipe dream.
R.I.P. Dan, you died doing what you loved.
Posted by: Russ McCall | 10/17/2011 at 05:45 PM
Racing is a dangerous sport, especially on oval tracks. Should IndyCars avoid ovals? I don't think so, but they should stay away from the LAs Vegas type tracks: short tracks with high banking.
Dan Wheldon was an exceptional driver and a great person. It is a terrible tragedy that we lost him.
I was a big fan of CART and IndyCar racing but after the split it all went downhill. Shame, really.
Posted by: Peter | 10/18/2011 at 08:15 AM
The problem is not Indycars on ovals, the problem is Indycars in pack racing--just like restrictor plate BS in NASCAR.
And it happens because of the nature of the track: lots of banking and relatively large.
1.5 mile crapovals with NASCAR are boring. 1.5 mile crapovals with Indycars are terrifying.
The solution is to go back to Milwaulkee, go back to PPIR (if it even still exists), go back to Phoenix, go back to Loudon... Go back to tracks that require drivers to DRIVE instead of being passengers, that require different lines, and passing, and braking, and actual skill instead of just pure balls and luck.
And other than Indy, keep them 1 mile or less.
Posted by: john | 10/19/2011 at 10:07 AM
There are inherent risks in motor racing. Injury or death will always be a part of motor racing...we all hope it does not happen...but anyone stepping into a race car should be smart enough to understand the possible consequences. I do not think there is someone holding a gun to a drivers head saying you must drive. For want of a better phrase 'You do the crime expect to do the time'.
Posted by: clive rayman | 10/19/2011 at 11:31 AM
Yeah, and it only seems to be non-racers who ever say that. I race short track stockcars myself, of course I know there's "always a chance." That doesn't mean you don't maximize safety. Taking Indycars off of tracks they don't belong on is maximizing safety. Racing around the big ovals requires all balls and zero skill. You just hold your foot to the mat, deal with the high g-forces, and hope to hell you don't miss a beat. Just like restrictor plate racing. It's not racing and it's unnecessarily dangerous.
Posted by: john | 10/20/2011 at 10:17 AM
John..I did race formula cars back in the cut throat 70's...in one of the most competitive series ever run in North America and also in Europe. We were not surrounded by steel as you are in your short track car. If you do not like a track do not enter the race quite simple.
By the way I was a real racer. I also use my full name in blogs...maybe you should check...before you say something silly.
Posted by: clive rayman | 10/23/2011 at 10:36 AM