Watch this space!
Coming soon ... but not right away ...
Oh, and why does Norman Spector hate women?
UPDATE (November 20, 2006.): That's it. Comments are closed. I don't have the time or the energy for this anymore.
| Tag and save this blog to your Del.icio.us favourites. ![]() |
News
|
« Sid Adilman | Main | THANK YOU! »
Coming soon ... but not right away ...
Oh, and why does Norman Spector hate women?
UPDATE (November 20, 2006.): That's it. Comments are closed. I don't have the time or the energy for this anymore.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/368260/6640953
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Watch this space!:
The comments to this entry are closed.
Re: stormin Norman Spectacles, imagine if he had stated that the only reason Israel gets sustained favourable press coverage is because half of North American media is owned or controlled by Jews. Harrumph fap indeed. What a goof.
By the way, is he related to Phil?
Posted by: dave | October 31, 2006 at 04:13 PM
Re: Coming soon ... but not right away ...
When!? Aaargh . . .
Happy Hallow'een
Posted by: Rod | October 31, 2006 at 04:57 PM
"but not right away"
I came here looking for a treat but it's a trick!
Posted by: Justin... | October 31, 2006 at 05:30 PM
Come back soon! I'd love to see you write about Edelmartgate, the Wal-Mart fake blog scandal that's got the PR blogosphere up in arms.
We miss you.
Posted by: Bob LeDrew | October 31, 2006 at 07:38 PM
Welcome home...d'oh!
Posted by: Greg | October 31, 2006 at 07:44 PM
"Half the Press Gallery now are women and women find this very offensive."
Well…….. I guess maybe, if such a prominent individual (male) called a prominent female (MP, CEO, reporter, etc) a bitch over the public domain there would be a reaction. Not very professional of Dr. Spector.
Welcome back!!!!!!
Posted by: neil | October 31, 2006 at 08:36 PM
Well - at least Michael Goldbloom got a treat!
Posted by: Jiminy C at the daughters | October 31, 2006 at 09:08 PM
Mme. Zerbie, I've missed posting periodocally on your fab dynamic comments strings.
Also, come back so we can commiserate together over poor l'il Warkins's inability to keep on uria heepin the rich T.O. M.I. handlers via brownnosin his Iggyness thru the final ballot while slagging Norma Bob 24/7....I was so looking forward to watching the duck lipped Grasper droig gag/embrace Jean Lapierre's neo-bloquois herding of Iggy into Lapierre's tried 'n treacherous l'il paulie martini mold cum Quebec slaughter gate...
Posted by: Scott Disher aka MoDuv | October 31, 2006 at 11:51 PM
Still counting your candy, I guess.
As far as Norman SPECTRE is concerned, we shouldn't be too surprised. He's a thuggish shill for all things neo-con and Israeli, and since Belinda Stronach defected the wrong way (from the Harper Party to the Liberals) she is far game for vilification.
Remember SPECTRE's character assassination of the CBC and ace reporter Neil Macdonald for daring to depict Palestinians as human beings?
This man is a nasty piece of work and is seriously overrated as a political expert.
The tragedy for us here in B.C. is that SPECTRE gets to spew every Monday on CKNW radio's "Bill Good Show." My, how standards have fallen at the former great AM98
Posted by: Greg Felton | October 31, 2006 at 11:59 PM
I think Norman Spector is a very nice man.
I'm turning over a new leaf.
There's mold on it.
Posted by: Dana | November 01, 2006 at 01:17 AM
Antonia, you had announced some changes to how comments would be moderated. Are these yet to come? I notice that once again a post about X is managing to morph into a disucssion regarding Israel.
Posted by: | November 01, 2006 at 07:38 AM
I wonder if it has occurred to SPECTRE that a lot of MEN also found Mackay's comment very offensive??
Mackay is such an embarrassment. Amateur hour. No doubt Harpo is pleased to see his possible leadership challenger digging his own grave so effectively.
Without Karlheinz Schreiber around to bail him out, Petey has no clue how to take responsibility for his actions. Just like he shrugged off responsibility for screwing Orchard and his supporters. What a douche.
I like this Weston column from yesterday's Sun:
http://www.ottawasun.com/News/Columnists/Weston_Greg/2006/10/31/2185940.html
Posted by: Huge Seagull | November 01, 2006 at 09:16 AM
i hope the whore denies saying it now. anything to keep that slut mackay in the news.
Posted by: sooey | November 01, 2006 at 09:40 AM
Antonia,
Ah, it is Halloween, the day after, and we get a ghost of a chance, eh? LOL
Comeon' back...asap!
Posted by: Bill-Muskoka | November 01, 2006 at 09:44 AM
...almost two months...twilight zone...same posters, same opinions..anyway, welcome back, AZ...
...me, I'm heading out to get some of that "Peter McKay Dog Food" that Rick Mercer was shilling for on CBC last night...hope he does as well as spokesman for that as he did for the "One Ton Challenge"...
http://www.cbc.ca/mercerreport/
Posted by: | November 01, 2006 at 11:44 AM
Straight Goods has a disturbing article by John Chuckman about MacKay's behaviour resembling that of a stalker:
http://www.straightgoods.ca/ViewFeature6.cfm?REF=638
"...Apparently for months, MacKay has been glaring and making faces at Stronach. His abusive behavior continued with such intensity that her party changed her seat to one behind another member..."
Posted by: V.K.J | November 01, 2006 at 12:42 PM
Like I haven't BEEN watching this space. :)
(lol@sooey)
Posted by: vinb | November 01, 2006 at 03:23 PM
Mercer was merciless last night...LMAO!
His Rant was on spot as well. Good to know Steve can make sandwiches on his own, because he may need that talent in the very near future.
Did anyone notice that Rick's dog only licked the Peter MacKay Dog Food, but did not actually eat it? There must be a correlation there...absolutely!
Posted by: Bill-Muskoka | November 01, 2006 at 04:37 PM
WITHOUT CASTING ASPERSIONS ON ANY OF THE POSTERS, CAN ANYONE PLEASE EXPLAIN TO ME WHAT MR SPECTORS COMMENTS ABOUT BELINDA STRONACH HAVE TO DO WITH ISRAEL,JUST CURIOUS.
Posted by: David Kaufman | November 01, 2006 at 04:41 PM
Welcome almost back Antonia! We missed you. As for Norman Spector....he's just another angry old white man living in British Columbia....and a typical Con.He may be a little more refined and intelligent than a dumbo thug like Peter MacKay. But scratch a Con and they always betray what they're really about: daddy knows best, anti-women and anti-gay. It's a dickhead thing. A male power problem. They appear to be attacking the Status of Women and the court challenge programs for ideological reasons.But it's really all about their mummies...
Posted by: Simon | November 01, 2006 at 07:26 PM
"Dave" in the first comment mentioned Israel to show that SPECTRE is a hypocrite for throwing a slur at the national press gallery for being mostly female (I think he's wrong).
Dave was pointing out, rightly, that if SPECTRE were so concerned about ingrained bias in reporting he should be exorcised about the (undeniable) zionist domination of our media.
The conclusion Dave was trying to make is that SPECTRE is the media equivavalent of a petty, drive-by slanderer who has little or no familiarity with ethical journalism.
Posted by: Greg Felton | November 01, 2006 at 07:42 PM
Who is Norman Spector? Better question, who cares? I have better things to learn. ta, ta
Posted by: amj | November 01, 2006 at 08:58 PM
I don't have time to count all the male v. female names here but a quick scan gives me the impression that a majority of the members are men.
http://www.gallery-tribune.ca/members.html
Posted by: Antonia Z. | November 02, 2006 at 12:16 AM
Antonia, baliis come back.
Your teasing cannot, will not, should not be beared anymore. It is bordering torture, or what, of course, as Bushists call 'unconventional exercise' for the body.
Posted by: Jinoole | November 02, 2006 at 04:01 AM
Such a small dose of you! Don't you realize that we're all addicted?
(Even more than candy...)
Stop teasing us! Come back soon.
Posted by: Michael Barwick | November 02, 2006 at 07:47 AM