Toronto Edition

« B.J. Ryan: A View From the Grassy Knoll | Main | Mail Bag »

April 27, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf8f353ef01156f5fc23f970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Griff's Power Rankings, Week 3:

Comments

Andrew

Hey Griff,

I know that the Jays seem like an illusion to many, but I think they're a .500 team, easily. If they play out the string at .500, they'll be at 89 wins and a good shot at the Wild Card. Is that really such an impossible thing to believe?

Jason

These rankings are finally respectable.
I think every team is ranked correctly, within a spot or two in either direction, of where they should be.
Good job this week!

Cameron

Curious to how the Marlins, who are losers of six straight, are higher than the Jays?

Vava

Friar Suck? Man, that's harsh! And I also think that ranking a team that's lost 6 straight, three of those to the Pirates, ahead of the Jays is a head scratcher.

Lee

"Like ranking Kriss Angel on most powerful men list" - It's like you're hoping they fail Griffin, just so you're prognosticating is shown to be right. A little optimism would be a refreshing change for your column.

Cavan

How are the Fish ranked higher than the jays after losing for almost a week straight?

MP

Not that this matters in the slightest, but you've misspelled the magician's name. It's spelled: "Criss Angel."

Stephen

Andrew, if you could find me a year (other than 1996, which was an outlier) when 89 wins has been enough for the AL Wild Card, I'll buy that they're a contender for that spot. The lowest total since then has been 91 wins, and in recent years the number has been around 95.

Let's also wait until they've played against the AL East powers, as well as making like the rest of the AL and beating up on the NL in interleague play.

And as Chacin and Guzman have shown Toronto fans through the years, it's one thing to look good on your first trip through the league. Once teams have seen a pitcher's stuff, they tend to slack off in terms of performance.

Joe

Stephen, Chacin was never good. Never. A guy with a 5+ ERA should never be mentioned in the same sentence, let alone compared, with Guzman.

And Griff, the Marlins should have taken more of a tumble. It would have been bang on if you had it: Sox, Dodgers then Jays. Jays and Dodgers could be interchangeable but the Sox are uno for the week.

I can't wait til the Jays hammer'em!

Rob

Andrew, if they play out the string at 500 that keeps them 8 games over 500 which puts them at 85-77, not 89-73.

Keith

Richard, when did you compile this list? Aside from the obvious problem of having a team on a 6 game losing streak one notch ahead of the Jays, who as you may know have the best record in all of baseball, you have the 9-9 Yankees ranked ahead of the 13-6 Cardinals and the 12-7 Mariners, and you have various sub-.500 and .500 clubs ranked ahead of the 11-7 Pirates. You seem to have looked at the standings for parts of this list (you nailed Washington), but in other cases (most glaringly the Yankees) you clearly have been using some other mysterious formula. The biggest inconsistency is, if Boston is ranked first because of a 10 game win streak, how do you rationalize the Marlins ranked #3 overall with a 6 game losing streak and the 6th best record in baseball?

stoeten

Hey, come on everybody, so what if the Marlins have lost six straight? There's way more wrong about their ranking than just that-- like how more than half of their wins have come against the Nationals.

WSG

Hi Richard – I’m surprised that you and your fellow Blue Jays writers are NOT making a BIGGER DEAL about the fact that right now, on April 27/09 … since Cito took over on June 20, 2008, the Blue Jays have the BEST RECORD IN MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL! I mean … come on!

blake

Might want to check the standings and recent games. The Cubs are fourth in their division and just dropped two of three against the Cardinals.

Brandon

Guys, he's pretty clearly basing his rankings on what he projects to be the best teams GOING FORWARD, and not just basing it on their record. If you wanted that, just go look at the standings (how boring). That's why a team with a good pedigree and expected success like the Yankees or Cubs would rank above the Mariners.

Now, to Richard: what's up with the comment on the Jays? You think their start is just an illusion i take it? Just when do they begin to gain credibility in your view? As others have stated, a LITTLE optimism from the hometeam reporters is nice!

Brandon

By the way, I predict the Jays will be the first team to crack Greinke this year, just as they were first to get to Edinson Volquez last year. You read it here first! :)

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Blue Jays - baseball blog



  • Richard Griffin began working for the Star as baseball columnist on Feb.13, 1995. Griffin began his career in major-league baseball with the Montreal Expos in 1973 while attending Concordia University. He became director of publicity in 1978. Griffin is in the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown as '93 winner of the Robert O. Fishel Award and has been at all or part of every World Series since 1978.

    Click here to send Richard your Blue Jays question and he'll answer a selection in the blog.

del.icio.us

Advertisement


Legal Notice

  • TheStar.com
    Copyright Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. All rights reserved. The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Toronto Star or www.thestar.com. The Star is not responsible for the content or views expressed on external sites. Distribution, transmission or republication of any material is strictly prohibited without the prior written permission of Toronto Star Newspapers Limited.
    For information please contact us using our webmaster form. www.thestar.com online since 1996.