Jays mailbag: How long will Bautista last in MLB?

It's days like Thursday, with the sad news surrounding the death of two-year-old Ryley Martin bringing out the compelling human drama and genuine emotions of Ricky Romero and J.P. Arencibia towards their departed young friend, that reaffirms all that is good about professional sports and its young stars.

Earlier in the afternoon I had talked to John McDonald for 10 minutes, which is always a feel-good occasion, a slamdunk in combating cynicism. But to then see the 24-year-old catcher from Miami and the 26-year-old pitcher from East L.A., neither of whom is married or has kids of their own, to hear these two young men describe their own devastated feelings when they heard about the death of young Ryley earlier in the day makes you forget, not forgive, all the anti-social behaviour that seems to dominate recent news about pro athletes.

It's not easy for athletes to dedicate a game to someone because that can backfire in the heartbeat of a three-run homer. But to have Romero and Arencibia respond the way they did to the tragedy of Ryley's leukemia, a horrible disease that snuffed out the life of a smiling boy they had played catch with and got to know the family as recently as April 2, to have the two men step up and pretty much combine for the win with seven innings of 3-hit ball and a game winning two-run homer, speaks volumes to the character of the two young Jays. This is a good Jays clubhouse from Jose Bautista on down.

On to the mailbag.  

Q-Hi Richard,

Given the rapid decline of guys like Jorge Posada, Derek Jeter, Miguel Tejada, etc. etc. at around the 36 to 37 age mark, I have to speculate at what age you would see a decline for Toronto's late blooming superstar. At 30 years old, it would be sad to think that we really only have 5-6 years and then a rapid decline after that. With that said, given the lack of miles on Jose's body, compared to guys like Jeter and Posada (a catcher no less) who have played since their early 20s plus the post season, would you say he could be productive well into his 40s OR is age the determining factor?

Maresh F, Toronto

A-Unfortunately, steroids had a lot to do with guys being productive well into their 40s. I remember talking to current Dodgers GM Ned Colletti (another Fishel Award winner by the way) when he was an assistant GM under Brian Sabean at the Giants. It was just before Barry Bonds signed his last contract and the Giants had commissioned an off-season study to gauge the declining numbers that could be expected of major-league player after they turned 40.

The study showed a remarkable consistency in players performances dropping off the table after 40. However, the Giants relented and gave Bonds one more huge deal. He turned that study on its ear and now we know why. But, now, with mandatory performance-enhancing drug testing since 2004 and, more importantly, with the rank and file of players in the union disgusted with what went down during the steroid era, you're seeing a return to the normal “best before” dates in baseball, including Jorge Posada and others. That means that at the end of this contract, when Bautista is 36-years-old, he'll likely have one more three-year contract in him. But if he remains at the levels he's playing rigtht now, it will be a great deal for the Jays.

Q-Hey Richard,

I wanted to know how Brett Lawrie is doing defensively down at AAA recently and if we can expect a call up soon, his hitting stats (.334BA, 9HR, 31RBI) are superb! Also, with Aaron Hill struggling to start the year again (.238, 0HR) it seems like it would not be in the best interest of the team to re-sign him long term. Have they thought about moving Lawrie back to 2nd, having either Hechavarria or Justin Jackson play short (when they're ready) and move Escobar to 3rd?

Josh Cymbalista, Thornhill

A-Lawrie, in his first season at third base after two years at second base in the Milwaukee farm system, made six errors in his fist 10 games at AAA-Las Vegas in April, but has committed just four miscues in his last 30 games at the hot corner. The Pacific Coast League, because of uneven field conditions, constant wind, etc. is not the easiest venue in which to learn a new position. He's adapting well.

As for Aaron Hill, the decision will not be whether to re-sign him long-term. He already has a Jays' contract that, following 2011, contains two option years that must be picked up or declined by the same deadline as any other 2011 free agent, 15 days after the end of the World Series. What you are suggesting is that they decline the options. The numbers for those two seasons are $8 million per year, which for a veteran starting second baseman are reasonable figures, but unless Hill steps it up in the next four months, he might have trouble even earning Type B status which means the Jays could let him go at the end of the year and receive no compensation. Look instead for GM Alex Anthopoulos to explore offers as the summer goes on from other teams that might have faith in Hill bouncing back with a change of scenery. The flexibility that comes with his contract is a positive in making any deal.

I think with all the effort they are putting in towards making Lawrie a third baseman, they would prefer to keep him at that infield position while going with Hechavarria and Escobar up the middle and making the determination of which one plays second, which plays short at a later date.

Q-Hi Richard,

After watching EE's atrocious performance vs Tampa recently, I am wondering if you can remember a game in the last 20 years that a Toronto player was been worse? Closest I could find was a 6-3 loss to Cleveland on Sept. 9th, 1998 when Alex Gonzalez SO 6 times and left 7 runners on base, but at least he didn't make any errors. Thanks Richard.

Adam Steeves, Kitchener

A-I honestly believe that the Encarnacion game at first base on Wednesday, May 18, was the absolute worst game of first base I have ever seen in 39 years in major-league baseball. In the first inning he went to his right and clanked a groundball with a chance for a force play at second. It was ruled a hit. In the second he charged a squeeze bunt by Sam Fuld, gloved it cleanly, saw there was no play at the plate, turned and underhanded an awkward parabolic feed to first base that pulled Hill off the bag. EE looked like one of those guys whose fingers get stuck in the bowling ball late and he lobs it halfway to the pins. In the third inning with B.J. Upton on first, EE fanned with his glove on a low pickoff throw from Jesse Litsch that bounded down the right field line and gave B.J. two bases. That same inning, Casey Kotchman bounced one to first base that ate EE up. He batted it down and it almost seemed like he wanted to throw himself on the ball like a grenade in case it exploded. It didn't. Finally, in the eighth, John Jaso ripped a hard grounder through Edwin that reminded me of the Charlie Brown grounder that spins the Peanuts character upside down with glove and clothes flying everywhere. He emerged from the game with an oh-for-4 and two errors. Worst ever game.        

Q-Griff,

As I watch this team I can't help but see a group a few hitters away from contending. Where could AA find a spot in our lineup for another bat? I'm guessing Prince Fielder is too much to ask for, but what about Nick Swisher? Lastly, despite all the '2012' talk, would AA try and grab a rental on someone like Fielder if we were within reach of the playoffs?

Ray S, Toronto

A-The Jays could use a few more hitters, specifically at second base, third base, in left field, centre field and at DH. Could they build a winner with a base of Arencibia behind the plate, Lind at first base, Escobar at shortstop and Bautista in right field? Yes. As for a rent-a-player concept this yeart, the Jays might do it but only if the contract was about to expire and there would be Type A compensation on the way back with a first round and a sandwich pick. Fielder qualifies in that regard. Swisher does not. In fact Swisher is no better than Eric Hinske. Under those conditions, the mid-season acquisition of a star falls inside the Jays' master plan from which they have not deviated thus far. However, the Red Sox and Yankees are not going to stand still either. Their money pit is deeper. My guess is that the Jays will hang around the .500 mark all season and the issue of contending in September does not arise.  

Q-My question is the Jays need a 3rd baseman, so what about a 28-year-old David Wright who is under team control for 2 yrs (club option)? It will cost a ton of prospects which the jays can afford. They can afford him salary-wise and when his contract is up the team should be good, and the chances of him re-signing would be good and other top-tier free agents may come.

Scott MacDonald, Tilbury

A-Brett Lawrie has a chance to be as much of an impact player as David Wright and he's seven years younger. Besides, Wright on May 16 went on the DL with a lower back stress fracture. To me the most impressive moment of Brett Lawrie at spring training came at Steinbrenner Field against the Yankees. He smashed a hard grounder three steps to the right of Derek Jeter, who moved over, gloved it and made a strong throw to first base. But by that time Lawrie was already well past the bag with an explosive burst. The quickness of the big man stunned the first base ump who called him out. In the seventh inning in the Jays clubhouse (media is allowed in during games in the spring) Lawrie and J.P. Arencibia were getting ready to go across the street to a Kenny Chesney concert and Lawrie was asked about the play. Matter-of-factly, even though he was trying to make the team and had been screwed, he shrugged and said "step and a half." Without protestation or invoking the malice of the baseball gods, he gathered up his teammate and headed for the Big Sombrero II. He's going to be a big leaguer soon.

Q-Hi Richard,

With a semi-platoon at catcher between Jose Molina and JP Arencibia and an obvious weakness at DH spot, would it not make sense for the Jays to bat Arencibia as a DH when Molina is the catcher? While his average isn't great, he has loads of upside and is showing good power and would be a better option than Rivera. It would also allow him to develop more consistency at the plate knowing he's at least getting regular at-bats?

A-It was never a strict platoon with the two catchers. At spring training, the idea was that Molina would have the youngest of the starters, Kyle Drabek, plus his prized peronal project from 2010, Brandon Morrow, with whom he had worked so well when John Buck was the starter. When Morrow was disabled at the end of the spring, Molina was handed Jo-Jo Reyes. When Morrow returned, Reyes went to the J.P. camp. The feeling was that with Arencibia having three of the five members of the rotation, he could ease his way towards more playing time. When Romero missed a start in Tampa and Drabek was moved up, that start came the afternoon after Morrow threw in a night game. It's difficult to conceive of the veteran Molina catching a day game after a night game. Arencibia stepped in behind the plate for Drabek and the two rookies worked well enough that they did it again five days later. Now it seems Drabek is also Arencibia's guy, and other than Morrow, Molina's schedule behind the plate will be determined more by schedule than by pitcher. The truth is that four of five days in the lineup is easy enough for Arencibia. Besides, DH'ing isn't really a day off. The Jays want Arencibia to be more concerned with guiding his pitchers than with what he contributes offensively. And teams with two catchers on the roster don't really like having one of them DH just in case the starter is nicked up and the DH must then enter to catch, meaning the pitcher must hit in the lineup for the rest of the game. Managers don't like being embarrassed.

Q-I'm not sure if you noticed how unbalanced the interleague play is: of the Jays' 6 series, Toronto plays 4 NL teams playing over .500 ball. Boston plays one! Yankees play 2. Toronto's already in tough being in the AL East, now this. They can pretty much kiss a playoff berth goodbye, if they ever had a chance to begin with....

M Wilson

A-There cannot possibly be a tougher inter-league road trip than the Jays have in June where they fulfill their entire 9-game interleague obligation, totally DH-less, starting in Cincinnati against the defending NL Central champs, then on to Atlanta to face one of the game's best starting rotations, finally to St. Louis against the perennially powerful Cards. Remember that's nine games with only eight hitters in the lineup. At least the Jays don't have a DH like Frank Thomas that can't play a position. Manager John Farrell can use the matchups and still manage to get at-bats for anyone because they all play a position – some of them two positions, not all of them well. By the way, those may be three of the six hottest ball parks in baseball mid-summer. I'm going to go to Brookstone before that trip to see if they've invented a small fan I can put in my shorts.

Jays mailbag: A legend's farewell, and unusual stats

Baseball is such a great game, and its heroes from the past are so easy to visualize in the mind's eye and so easy to hold onto in a sporting respect and awe because of the huge storehouse of statistics and information.

There is a unique reverence in which we hold baseball's history unlike other sports. The legends stay in the public eye and we feel we know tham.

But despite all the feel-good moments baseball brings, reality sometimes intrudes and such is the case with a brief note recieved on Friday from the Hall of Fame in Cooperstown. It is a statement from legendary Twins' slugger and Hall-of-Famer from the class of '84, Harmon Killebrew, now 74-years-old:

“It is with profound sadness that I share with you that my continued battle with esophageal cancer is coming to an end. With the continued love and support of my wife, Nita, I have exhausted all options with respect to controlling this awful disease. My illness has progressed beyond my doctors’ expectation of cure.

“
I have spent the past decade of my life promoting hospice care and educating people on its benefits. I am very comfortable taking this next step and experiencing the compassionate care that hospice provides.

“
I am comforted by the fact that I am surrounded by my family and friends. I thank you for the outpouring of concern, prayers and encouragement that you have shown me. I look forward to spending my final days in comfort and peace with Nita by my side.”

Killebrew still lives in Minneapolis. Our thoughts and prayers are with him.

 

Now to the mailbag.

Q-Dear Richard,

In last night’s game I saw Rajai Davis steal 2nd twice, taking the bat out of Bautista's hands...What's happening? I've never seen the green light given while a slugger is up.

Peter Thomson, Elizabeth City , NC

A-You'll see a lot of things you've never seen if you watch these Jays every day. There is one train of thought, as you point out, in which you never take the bat out of your best hitter's hands – by stealing second and leaving a base open for the opponent to pitch around Bautista, especially with Adam Lind on the shelf. But there's another train of thought in which the feeling is the more runners you get on base, the more times the heart of your order and your best hitters (i.e. Bautista) will spin through it and  come to the plate. That's the thought process of the Jays and rookie manager John Farrell.

If base-stealing coach Torey Lovullo sees favourable splits adding the pitcher's time to the plate and the catcher's pop time to second base, and if Davis or any other runner is a mortal lock to be safe on a steal, the Jays feel they must take advantage. Yes, it's rare to see that strategy in the majors with many teams not wanting to take the bat out of their best plyer's hands, but, let's face it, if an opposing team wants to be careful with Bautista and they end up walking him, they will do it whether the runner is on first or second base. I agree with the Jays' strategy. To me, more baserunners means more opportunity to score more runs. It's not a one-man team – or at least it shouldn't be.    

Q-Keep hearing all this great stuff about 'Non-prospect' Chad Beck. Wondering exactly what's going on to turn a 90-94 mph fastball into a 93-97 mph fastball? I also hear that he just added a splitter this year and that he finally figured out the change-up and that his slider is better. Either way, he's leaps and bounds better than he's ever been. Is he for real? Has he entered the picture?

Chris Thom, Toronto

A-I am a big fan of the veracity of scouting and especially if 30 organizations' scouts all had the same opinion on a player. Such is the case with 6-4, 245 lb. righthander Chad Beck, currently with AA-New Hampshire. He was drafted 43rd round by the Jays in 2004 and 14th round by the Diamondbacks two years later. He came to pro ball with two workable pitches, a fastball and a slider and so was seen as a bullpen future, at best.

The Jays' organization under GM Alex Anthopoulos preaches teaching the same skills all the way up and down the organization - from the majors to all of its summer league teams. As such, beginning with pitching coach Bruce Walton on down, the change-up is an integral part of the Jays' organization's pitching plan. Beck is one of those pitcers that has added the change and it has moved him up in terms of being a future major-leaguer, but it's tough to see him forcing his way up the deep and talented Jays organization depth chart of starting pitchers.

It's a nice story for Beck but the best I could see for him is if later in the summer the Jays needed a spot starter as an injury fill and they didn't want to start the clock on any of their young stud pitchers, they could give the 26-year-old Beck a call. But in terms of long-term major-league future with the Jays, there is a stampede running him over.     

Q-Hey Griff.

Since baseball is filled with unusual stats I thought I'd add my own. I find it very strange this year that in the opening game of a series the Jays are now 10-2. (should be 11-1 but the bullpen had a meltdown in the opening Seattle game that I happened to be attending). In the rest of the games the Jays are a terrible 6-18. Any ideas as to why the Jays rise to the occasion in game one of a series only? Or is it just coincidence?

Tim McDonald, Marysville WA

A-There are many factors that would go into such an interpretative stat, not the least of which is coincidence. But one factor that I think does play into it is that when you're an up and coming team like the Jays, not expected to contend, even by your own front office, when you have won the first game of a three-game series, a natural tendency might be to just say to yourselves, “Hey guys, all we have to do is split the next two games and we win the series.” The same thing with winning the first two games.

The championship teams at that point with their foot on the throat of an opponent would move all their weight forward and crush him, the Jays and teams with lower expectations and a recent history of mediocrity, would mentally step away and be happy with the first two wins and hey, it's great if we sweep, but we've won the series. It's clearly not the pitching matchups because teams are just flowing through their rotations and you can never tell who will be pitching Game 1 in a series. 

Q-Hi Rich,

I enjoyed Morgan Campbell's column about the Jays maybe playing better when the dome is closed. I wanted to ask you if you think the Jays play better in night games than day games.

I couldn't find the start times for all the Jays games, but they are 1-11 on Saturdays and Sundays (which are usually day games) and 15-9 on Monday to Friday (usually night games). Do you think there is a reason for this? Are they still half asleep during day games?

Patrick Darling, Toronto

A-Like the previous question, the answer to this is all theory. There's no right or wrong. I'd like to blame it on Twitter, but, instead, I think a lot of that losing Jays statistic in day games, especially for the weekend games, lies in the building of routines. Saturday games are usually day games following a Friday night game, so there's not a lot of turnaround hours from the end of one game to reporting to the ballpark for the next. Some veteran players around baseball are disciplined to shut it down right after the Friday night game and mentally start prepping for the next day. Other teams, especially with younger, inexperienced players, have not yet learned that skill.

Then on Sundays, the second of back-to-back day games, if the Jays are on the road, they have to pack their bags, check out of the hotel, they have a later reporting time at the ballpark and usually don't stage batting practice. Breakfast in the clubhouse, hit in the batting cage, stretch and then Play Ball. That's a huge difference in routine and athletes are creatures of habit as much as anyone else. At home games, they're with family on Sunday mornings, chilling before heading to the park and strapping it on for a 1:00 p.m. start. I honestly think from my experience, if given a choice, most players would rather play night games all the time.

Q-Hi Richard,

I look forward to your blog each week. You stated in a recent article that "It was the frothy, faithful in Jays Nation cooking up a cauldron of optimism" for the 2011 pitching staff. My question is: Do you think 2012 is realistic for the Jays to contend, as management has stated? (And I have read in this paper numerous time.)

Management keeps running out a veteran lineup with the likes of Jo-Jo Reyes, Patterson, Johnny Mac, Rivera, Molina etc. The payroll already indicates they aren't trying to win this year. So instead of benching and optioning the future to the minors, why not give them a shot?

Jeff Iles, Haliburton

A-That sentence sings, doesn't it? And by the way, Reyes is only 26, so not quite veteran. Here's the sequence of building years that the Jays have followed under Anthopoulos. In 2010, AA let Cito Gaston finish out his contract as manager partly as a favour to Paul Beeston, because expectations were low and partly becuse they were simply looking to identify those players that could play, moving forward. That season was a season for keeping notes, finding out which of the players on hand were core players moving forward and which were going to be moved on to make room for core players moving forward. In 2011, the current season, they have hired their manager of the future, have put those identified core players in places to succeed and now need to see if they were correct in their assessments.

So far, they have been correct on Bautista and the decision to sign him long-term, correct on Lind and moving him to first base, on J.P. Arencibia and trusting him to develop, on Yunel Escobar as a nice two-way shortstop, on Brandon Morrow and Ricky Romero and even Kyle Drabek. They also need to find out which of their abundance of bullpen guys they are going to keep moving to 2012.

As you rightly point out, this current Jays roster is still not good enough to win in 2012, but Anthopoulos, after two years of identifying his team's strengths and weaknesses, must take the next step as a show of faith with an impatient fan base. The way he can compete next year is to keep identified strengths in place but fill in their weakesses by spending money on trades and free agency. They have a nice inventory of minor league talent to use in the off season to trade for the right veteran in the right position and have money to spend where they can also sign a short-term veteran starter out of the free-agent pool to help put them over the top. I believe when the time is right, these guys are willing to bump payroll over $100 million and they have promised that it will be 2012. They must keep their word.

Q-Hi Richard,

I know many of us are concerned about the Jays rotation and the lack of going deep into ballgames. I know most of it is command issues and not being economical with pitches. But how much can we start to put down to Farrell? I know priority one is to "protect the young arms," but is he being overly abusive of his bullpen in being so dogmatic over pitch counts?

I don't mind if you baby Drabek a bit, but Romero should be able to go to 120/130 on occasion by now if he's pitching OK and the bullpen needs a rest. Litsch is a veteran and not really a prospect (and has a sturdy build). Jojo is a freebie arm. You'd think Farrell would get them more work. I also don't get yesterday's quick hook on Morrow any more than he does. His command wasn't great but he had given up only 2 runs and 3 hits when pulled, at the end of a 4-game series when the bullpen had been overworked.

Let him try to pitch his way out of it. It can only help in the long run.

Mark Acheson, London

A-Consider in the last 15 games, only one Jays starter has pitched seven innings. That was Jo-Jo Reyes. During that stretch, heading into Minneapolis, Jays starters have averaged slightly over 5-1/3 innings. Part of that stems from Farrell having a seven and eight man bullpen, perhaps feeling he can go get his starter early and still have arms available. But there's no way that any major league team should enter a game with two healthy bench players and eight healthy relievers. It makes no sense and yes Jays' starters need to go deeper into games and that means pitching to contact more early in counts. Farrell gave the ultimate bakhanded compliment to Litsch the other day saying how impressed he was that Jesse with all those 3-2 counts did not walk a batter. Huh!

If the Jays are going to brag about their young rotation, as I wrote in a column the other day, they have to become quality major-league starters, not promising major-league starters. There may even be a part of these young starters that at this point under Farrell feel that okay I'm in the sixth now. He's coming to get me soon. Maybe they need to be left out to pitch through seven and then into the eighth as part of the next step in their development. As writers there every day, there has becomean edge, an impatience, a frustration shown by Farrell towards the failures of his players in certain situations, both on the mound and as position players. He's still a rookie and maybe it's part of his own learning process, but they should cut the bullpen to six relievers. 

Q-Hi Richard,

Love the blog. I was just wondering about the pitching in the rest of the AL. It seems like every game, the Jays are facing guys like James Shields, Jered Weaver, John Lackey, Justin Verlander, etc. Is this a sign of increased depth in pitching in the American League or is the inconsistency of the Jays rotation making other teams starters look better than they actually are? More still, is it the Jays hitters who are making these pitchers look good or have the Jays just been cursed with a tough April/May schdule?

Matt Strmec, Bolton

A-There's increased depth in pitching everywhere, not just the AL, starting with last season as the Year of the Pitcher. A lot of that pitching dominance stems from the MLB mandatory testing program for performance enhancers starting in '04 and the effect it has had on diminishing offences. That also makes you wonder about where the Jays' young rotation really stands relative to the rest of baseball. Yes, the Jays starters have showed significant improvement over the past two years, but it's also a trend in baseball. There are statistics, even at ther college level about the huge decrease in home runs and they blame it on the restrictions that have been imposed on bat manufacturers, but some of is is the clean, more natural hitters, even at that level of ball. The Jays have had a tough early schedule, but they also have had injuries to key hitters and have now used 33 different lineups in 37 games.

Q-Corey Patterson is playing a very tentative centre field. I have seen him a number of times pull up and a catchable ball fall in for a "base hit." For example, a number of balls that hit near or at the base of the wall, and short flies that he prefers to take on the bounce. What is your take on his play? When do we see Podsednik? I know Gose and Thames have to gain maturity and should not be rushed.

Jim Gilhuly, Waterloo

A-The last year that Patterson played regular centre field in the majors was 2008. Since then and before this season, he had played 14 games in centre. This year with the Jays he's played 23. That's more a lineup out of necessity than anything else. How poorly has he played the wall? You know when you put the like ends of magnets together and they repel each other, impossible to get them to touch, that seems to be the same relationship Corey has with outfield fences. It may also be a case of having seen Vernon Wells at the position for the entire decade that spoiled fans and made their perception of Rajai Davis and Patterson so jarring. As you are probably already aware, Podsednik asked for and was give his release by the Jays to pursue his goals of reaching the majors with another organization yet to be determined. Podsednik had been slipping down the depth chart, with Patterson's useable major-league effort, with Dewayne Wise at Triple-A and with the development of Eric Thames and with Travis Snider now in Vegas too. The young galloping Gose is startng to heat up in New Hampshire and Thames is having an all-star year in Vegas.   

Q-Richard,

Love the blog, it certainly gets me to questioning the reason for some of the moves the Jays make. One move I haven't figured out yet is why they brought up David Cooper? He might be the first baseman of the future somewhere, but it certainly looks like Lind has taken that spot for the next few years. EE is a backup for Lind. So Cooper is the DH and he is hitting .143 (as of May 8). Are they trying to see how he hits against major league pitching before sending him down again? I'm sure there are others that could fill his spot on the bench and be more effective during this rash of injuries hitting the team.

Thanks

Bob Mayhew, Lindsay

A-To me, Cooper will develop into one of those useful bench players that every organization needs who can come up and fill in for a while and then go back down to the minors. The only downside is that he has just the one position, first base, and as you point out,  being a lefthanded hitter, with Lind under contract and adjusting to the position fairly well, how often will that happen. As soon as the Jays settle their third base dilemma with Brett Lawrie coming up – likely for good - then Cooper will have to go down, with Edwin Encarnacion off the field where he belongs and into the DH role.

Jays mailbag: What you see is what you get with Yunel

A lot of the talk in the last week has centred around a Jays' rotation that continues to average under six innings per start, placing a huge burden on the talented relief corps.

The bullpen has by and large been great, with a favourable matchup ready for every occasion. They should know what they're doing with pitchers, with John Farrell, Bruce Walton and rookie bullpen coach Pat Hentgen pooling their knowledge.

As an aid to understanding where the next generation of Jays' starters is coming from, here through May 4 is a list of pitchers that have made starts at AAA-Las Vegas or AA-New Hampshire.

In Vegas: Brad Mills (2-2, 2.03); Scott Richmond (1-1, 7.04); Mike MacDonald (1-1, 7.13); Luis Perez (1-1, 6.89); Randy Boone (1-1, 1.00); Brett Cecil (1-1, 10.64); Willie Collazzo (0-0, 5.52); Chad Cordero (0-2, 10.66) and Jesse Litsch.

In New Hampshire: Zach Stewart (2-1, 2.64); Rei Gonzalez (3-1, 1.38); Chad Beck (3-0, 2.42); Joel Carreno (0-3, 6.56); B.J. LaMura (1-1, 1.80) and Collazzo. Highly touted No. 1 picks Deck McGuire and Chad Jenkins are both at A-Dunedin. On to the mailbag.

Q-Yunel Escobar is a great defensive shortstop. I was at the games at Yankee Stadium and he made some great throws and started a few tough double plays. However he seems to have fallen off at the plate, and I'm wondering if it's a matter of concentration. On Sunday, he made a bonehead defensive play that ended up leading to an extra run when Curtis Granderson hit a homer. Do you think Escobar can ever put together a consistent season that is indicative of his immense talent?

Jason S., San Francisco

A-Escobar was 3-for-23 on the New York and Tampa portions of the recent road trip. His ideal spot is in the 2-hole with Jose Bautista batting behind him. When he was forced to bat third in Tampa with no Bautista in the lineup, he saw different pitches because they didn't have to challenge him as much. You don't want to walk him with Bautista coming up. His hitting has been a little streaky at times with the Jays and will likely continue to be, but, physically, his excellent, sometimes flashy fielding abilities have gone under the radar since he joined the Jays.

Mentally Escobar still has lapses as he did on that play in New York where he tried to throw out the speedy Brett Gardner at third base on a tag play instead of taking the routine out at first base that would have been the second out of the inning. It would have made some sense to take that chance with nobody out. If you give him third with nobody out then you have to bring the infield in with a one-run lead. But with two out and Gardner on third they were going to play the infield at normal depth. Give it to him.

Following this Yankee play, a discombobulated Jesse Litsch drifted a fastball back over the plate and Granderson took him deep and the Jays never came back. Escobar has made fewer of those funky decisions this year than he did last. But in terms of a monster, breakout season, at 28-years-old it might be that what you see is what you get and that's not really a bad thing to have on your side.  

Q-Hey Richard,

Heard you on TSN Radio the other day and you were talking about how the Jays need someone to step up in the rotation to have that Halladay-like presence in which you know you will get a win every 5th day. Do you think that when the Jays are ready to compete they will find someone from outside the organization to fill that role? i.e. a Jack Morris or Dave Stewart type move? Or will one of these five guys right now develop into that role (or someone of the farm)?

Thanks for the insight!

Matt S., North Bay 

A-The conversation wasn't so much specifically about a win every fifth day as it was a guy that could be counted on for 7-9 innings every fifth day to help schedule your bullpen some rest. We had that same discussion with John Farrell in the dugout in Tampa on Thursday. Until the Jays have someone right here, right now, step up as that workhorse guy, the Jays' bullpen will seem perpetually overworked. No major league bullpen should need eight relievers. Even seven in the pen should be more than enough to get you through a busy stretch with no off days. Farrell pinpointed Ricky Romero and Brandon Morrow as the two guys on this current staff that could become that Doc guy – but they haven't yet.

You make a good point though. If the Jays want to compete in 2012, the year of the second wild-card, I could see them reaching out short-term for a veteran free agent for one plus an option or two years, a guy with a track record and one good final bolt of lightning in him. By the time that guy has served his purpose, someone in this generation of Jays' starters – my guess is Morrow – should have stepped up. 

Q-Hi Richard,

I am a long time reader of your mailbag. Over the past couple of years I have felt like player moves and lineup changes seemed to be obvious far before they were ever made. This year I am starting to think that the opposite is true. What are your thoughts on the numerous pitching moves and the Snider situation?

Matt M., St. Catharines

A-I think a lot of times in the past Jays moves have seemed obvious because they have been rumoured beforehand from various U.S. media sources. The difference this year is that Jays moves seem to come out of the blue because the entire organization has a closed-mouth policy. Anthopoulos has made himself the only spokesman for the club in terms of personnel moves and he knows within his own organization who knows what he knows. So if there is a leak, he knows the likely sources.

As for the moves themselves, the Jays this year are high on maintaining inventory. If the choice has been between a player with options and a player without, they have gone with the decision that will keep all players in the organization. Even when they designated David Purcey for assignment after his Seattle meltdown, AA made sure he got a player back for him in former Jays' minor league reliever Danny Farquhar. I asked AA during the winter if he had an ideal roster in mind with three months to go until opening day. He said he did not and instead if there was a move that would make his club better that he would make it. That helps explain the off-season ratcheting up of his closer situation from Octavio Dotel to Jon Rauch to Frankie Francisco. With Jason Frasor, Shawn Camp and Marc Rzepczynski, Dotel's role is diminished, but he can still pitch at this level, so that's not a bad thing.

Travis Snider I believe was the victim of options and service time. He was struggling at the time so it made the decision to send him down easy, but honestly, who would you rather have in your lineup, Snider or Juan Rivera? Snider is still dangerous in hitter's counts and has been in a bad streak of guessing wrong when major-league pitchers gets ahead. He's not going to improve in that aspect by going to the minors and facing pitchers that have no idea how to approach him unarmed as they are from extensive scouting reports. The only way at this point to get rid of Rivera is to designate him or release him, but as a player he has at least some value for Anthopoulos in a year they are not planning on winning – although not the $5.25 million value his contract would suggest. I would not be surprised if since spring training, AA has been looking for some value for Rivera.

But Snider had an option and with 1 year and 126 days of service time would likely have been a Super-2 arbitration eligible player. That's the top 17-percent of players with two plus years. If the Jays keep him in the minors over a month, he would likely lose that status and be under club control in the off-season of 2011-12. This Jays front office has all of the numbers and angles ahead of anyone.            

Q-Hey Griff,

As a continued connoisseur of the A.A. Kool-aid, I continue to marvel at the brilliance of parlaying V.W. at $86 million for 4 years into Bautista at $65 million for 5 years. Now leading every important offensive category in the AL outside of RBI, is Bautista's April the greatest April offensive performance in team history?

Benjamin C., Toronto

A-Bautista's April could have been greater except for the opposing pitchers pitching around him with a plethora of semi-intentional walks. There have been some great Jays Aprils in the past that rival Jose's. In April 1992, Hall-of-Famer Roberto Alomar hit .382 with three homers, 19 RBIs and eight steals. In April 1993, John Olerud hit .450 with three homers, 18 RBIs and 36 hits. In April 1994, Joe Carter hit .312 with nine homers and 31 RBIs. Bautista's month ranks right up there. 

The key for Anthopoulos is that he pays attention to every detail of every conversation he has and is constantly trying to organize three-ways so that most times before he picks up the phone, he knows what the other GM is looking for. When the Angels failed to sign Carl Crawford and failed to land Adrian Beltre, he knew that they were still looking for a middle of the order bat and that they had money to spend. It's also how he got Anthony Gose when finally the Phillies let him go to the Astros in the Roy Oswalt deal. He picked up the phone and offered Brett Wallace. Done.

Q-So I just read your mailbag reply to the question of demoting Travis Snider - about how it would make no sense at all. Now that he actually has been sent down, what do you think AA is thinking, and what this means for Snider's future in the Jays organization?

Thanks,

Scott P., Burlington

A-That question is answered above and I believe if the Jays were able to carry two more bench players instead of a full roster of bullpen pitchers, they could have worked with Snider at the major-league level with Dwayne Murphy fixing any flaws. But they can't afford that so they cleared him off the deck for a short period of time. I believe he still has a bright future with the Jays, especially if they don’t have to go to arbitration with him until after the 2012 season.

Q-Hi Richard,

The one thing that really sets me off is when I see overweight baseball players and they are referred to as an "athlete". I was watching Jesse Litsch pitch against the Rangers the other night, and I was quite alarmed by his girth compared to what I remember him from the past. I know that there have been (and there still are) highly successful overweight players (David Wells, CC Sabathia, Babe Ruth, both father and son Fielders, etc.), but in this day and age of athletic conditioning, it seems moronic that teams do not implement a system where players are forced to come into camp in peak physical condition such as in basketball and hockey (and to a certain extent football). If say Jesse Litsch and Jo-Jo Reyes were in better physical condition, would this not help their performance that much more, especially from a stamina perspective as they're pitching late into games? Do the Jays not enforce conditioning upon its athletes?

Thanks.

Zaki A., Milton

A-I for one am relieved to see the return of everyman bodies to the major-league scene. It means steroids are in hasty retreat. Certainly guys that are carrying a little extra weight could not play in the NHL (where by the way they don't have mandatory testing for PED) but in basketball, you can play eight minutes a game carrying extra poundage. What about Oliver Miller? For pitchers it's more about cardiovascular fitness and with some guys like Litsch and Boomer Wells, Rick Reuschel, Fred Gladding and many others, as long as their legs and heart can support the weight, teams are fine with it. You want an example of a guy that became trim and muscular and lost his sport's mojo, how about David Duval on the PGA Tour. Ranked No. 1 in the world as a chubby golfer, he went to the fitness trailer and the gym and came away an Adonis, but one with a five handicap. 

Q-Hi Richard,

Thanks for keeping us informed, love the mailbag. My first question has to do with the seemingly stubborn decision to keep Jo-Jo Reyes in the rotation. I know it’s only the end of April, but how long will they stick with him? There are clearly better options available (Brad Mills, Zach Stewart, Scott Richmond) and the Jays have been talking about the need for a second lefty in the pen. If they want to keep their 'assets' so bad, why not put him there? Second, EE has become close to unbearable at third. Why have the Jays flip-flopped so many times so far on what to do with him? He has cost them more than one game with his glove. That to me is not fielding your 'best team' as they promised.

Isaac O., Thornhill 

A-Reyes is the classic example of a guy forever teetering on the brink of losing a roster spot. If he had arrived at spring training with a minor-league option remaining, he would be pitching in AAA-Las Vegas right now. But they wanted to keep his arm in the organization and felt he would not clear waivers from 29 other teams. Then Morrow was disabled at the end of camp and the decision was easy. Each major league start is an audition for Reyes and he has tantalizingly jumped back and forth between bad starts and good starts. Every time he has a start that has him with one foot out the door, he comes back with an encouraging outing. If Jo-Jo knew what was coming next he'd be psychic.

As for the second lefty in the pen, that's what I would do as soon as one of the young guys down on the farm is ready to contribute. Rzepczynski is going to be worn out by August unless they get another lefty out there to help him and the obvious choice is Reyes.  

Q-With the Jays' pitching woes and Cincinnati Red's pitcher Homer Bailey out of options in a competitive rotation, do you see A.A making a move for a former promising prospect a la Brandon Morrow?

David W., Toronto

A-You throw the term “pitching woes” around pretty loosely. Bailey has a lot in common with the assortment of pitchers the Jays are currently going with and nurturing on the farm. Bailey is 25-years-old, a former first round draft pick, has had an up-and-down minor-league career and is coming off of recent shoulder woes that put him on the DL. He made a successful six inning start for the Reds on Wednesday and is in the rotation of the defending NL Central champs. I think the closer you pay attention to any one team, the more critical you are of what you've got. Morrow was a case of a player being used in the wrong role and needing a fresh start. He made adjustments and is on the rise. The M's eventually ended up with a closer in Brandon League. Besides, A.A. likes guys with options. 

Jays mailbag: How about sending the Triple-A 51s to Montreal instead?

Note to Paul Beeston regarding the staging of a Jays' exhibition game in Montreal. Keep that bone in your pocket Mr. Beeston, right next to your Cubans.

Montrealers don't need your charity if all it involves is playing a one or two-game exhibition series at the Big O coming out of spring training. That's a no-win situation for that city's knowledgeable ball fans.

Montreal deserves professional baseball but it has to be more substantial than that. Those striving-to-impress exhibition games in any sport are horrible for a city, especially one trying to re-assert itself as a baseball town. Think of the Bills in Toronto. People were using that opportunity as an indicator of the city's NFL interest. But the whole Bills experiment has been counter-productive with the NFL.

As for Montreal and pro baseball again, Jays' no-name pitchers in games with minor-league players as the real major-leaguers rest up for opening day. No, keep it. Montreal is already a baseball town. The Montreal Royals played in that city from 1897-1917 and from 1928-1960. Then the Expos came on board as Canada's first major-league team and played with pride from 1969-2004.

As an ex-Montrealer, we don't need your table scraps.  

Hey, instead, how about the Jays working with established corporate money in Montreal and coordinating an ownership group to bring Jays' Triple-A baseball back to Montreal as a top farm club in a new 12,000 seat stadium built somewhere near the downtown core.

Now that would be a worthwhile project.

The Jays will be trying to get out of Las Vegas after 2012 and GM Alex Anthopoulos ( a native Montrealer) while still an assistant GM three years ago talked about the hypocrisy of major-league baseball taking all its affiliate minor-league teams out of Canada and how that should change.

A man of his word, A.A. as GM has already put a short-season A team in Vancouver.

Forget the exhibition concept for Montreal. Olympic Stadium was not a good playing surface at the best of times, bordering on the dangerous. Any potential baseball configuration of that stadium has already been put in the rear-view mirror by the Quebec government with the letters reading “Warning. Objections may be closer than they appear.”

What Montreal needs is a new 12,000 seat minor-league ballpark funded privately with the potential to be expanded to 40,000, built in the style of that ballpark in Buffalo you drive by on the way to a Sabres game. Yes, that would be the first step to re-establishing Montreal as a baseball town after the Expos were purposely sabotaged by major-leaguer baseball with the complicity of the Jays who wanted Canada for themselves. They took franchises out of Milwaukee, Seattle and Kansas City and they all have franchises again. Why not Montreal, but first they need success at Triple-A.        

Q. Griff - What a start! I have a humdinger of a question for you which concerns Juan Rivera. It is clear that he has become the odd man in the lineup and his demotion from the field is proof of this. Would they consider simply releasing him or sending him to the minors via waivers? The roster spot could be used by any number of guys knocking on the door (if not Lawrie, then perhaps Thames). At this point, who is going to take him - even if we eat his salary? My feeling is that it is time to cut our losses and accept an addition by subtraction situation. Help me out with this one.

Mauro Cavazzon, Markham

A. The moment of truth for Juan Rivera and his future with the Jays will come maybe as early as when Corey Patterson is ready to return from what looked very much like a concussion when hit in the head by Daniel Bard.

However in the meantime there always remains the likelihood that another injury will affect the roster makeup and postpone his departure, something like maybe Wednesday's knee to the head of Yunel Escobar.

At the end of the spring, there was room for both Rivera and Patterson when Jose Bautista was a third baseman but now that the MLB home run king is back in right, they don't need five outfielders. As for teams willing to take Rivera, if the Jays would be willing to pay the lion's share of his $5.25 million in a trade, which they would, there are teams out there that would easily take him as a fourth outfielder.

He's not an awful player, he just stands out as a bad fit on this Jays' team moving forward. They would have to designate him for assignment before they released him, if it came down to that, and there is very little likelihood, since the contract is guaranteed anyway, that Rivera would accept assignment to AAA-Las Vegas.

Besides, the outfield in Vegas of Eric Thames, Adam Loewen and Darin Mastroianni needs to play every day. At some point in the not too distant future, Rivera will no longer be a Jay and the salary the club is forced to eat won't be a factor. It balances nicely against the $23 million they saved when Vernon Wells took his services to the Angels.

Q. Hi Richard, I'm just wondering what the Jays' thinking is behind assigning Zack Stewart to New Hampshire instead of Vegas.
They can't be that apprehensive of sending young prospects to the desert can they? There's also the weather
 factor, cold start early in the year versus warm climate.
 Now, far be it for me to make these judgements but I just can't come up with a logical reason that Stewart (and
 Jon Diaz for that matter) are back at AA to start the year.
 Also, why hasn't Brett Lawrie been assigned to any team yet? 
Maybe you can shed some light.

A. The Vegas schedule starts on the road on Thursday and they open by playing four in Fresno and four more in Sacramento before the home opener on April 15. The brightest-light prospects of the Jays' organization's advanced minor league starting pitchers include Stewart (at AA),  Henderson Alvarez (DL), Chad Jenkins and Deck McGuire, all at A-Dunedin. None of the fab four is pitching in the bright lights of Vegas. On purpose? Well, yeah. Guys like Brad Mills, Robert Ray, Luis Perez, Mike MacDonald and Scott Richmond are starters in Vegas. Clearly, the Jays do not want their prime young pitching prospects in Sin City. Kyle Drabek spent the entire season in 2010 at New Hampshire and went right to the majors. It's not an impediment. Double-A is the most important level. The Jays are looking forward to the day they can replace the poor playing conditions of Vegas with another Triple-A city closer to Toronto – like maybe Ottawa. As for Lawrie, the studly native of Langley, B.C. Is indeed opening the season with the 51s at third base. Maybe not for long. 

Q. Hi Richard. I read your blog every week and each one of your columns. I'm 31, and I've been a long-time Jays fan, and I'm really excited about this team, and about the work of AA. So I was a bit dismayed to read your characterization of the "mostly younger crowd in the upper deck, the MTV reality, life in the raw generation, to whom drinking in excess, bad language and physical confrontation mean only one thing — Jersey Shore."

While 31 is not all that young, I would still consider myself a 'younger' fan. And I just wanted to make clear that many of us 'younger crowd' considered the behaviour exhibited at Friday's home opener to be disgraceful and ridiculous. I come to watch the games, not to watch drunken idiots punch each other in the stands. I'm not sure when the Jays home opener became the gong show that it now is, but I really wish the Rogers Centre would take a much stronger stance in responding.

From my seat (Section 532, Row 6), I witnessed no less than 4 incidents. Each one was allowed to continue for quite some time before a response, which was usually one lone usher trying to deal with 25-30 drunk and rowdy individuals chanting in his/her face. This is no way to manage a crowd. If the Jays truly cared about the fan experience, they would have a much larger (in numbers) and more effective (in response time) security staff for Opening Night.

While the energy of a full Rogers Centre is great and a fabulous home-field advantage, there is a big difference between being amped up for your team to win (which I really enjoy being a part of), and attending an event where you pay no attention to what is happening on the field because you are too busy hurling insults at the equally-intoxicated idiots around you in anticipation of sparking a fight.

So please don't lump us all into the same category. There are many young fans out there who AREN'T part of the "Jersey Shore generation".

Julie G.

A. I received quite a few e-mails with variations on that theme. President Paul Beeston apologized on Sunday for some of the opening night hooliganism, pointing out that the Jays had extra security on hand realizing it was a Friday night and that thousands might have had an afternoon head start towards their own personal brain-numbing oblivion.

It just seems to me that back in the day there existed more “happy” drunks as opposed to these days when alcohol seems to make more younger people angrier and more combative. From what you and others are saying that supposed extra security was really nowhere to be seen when push came to shove. The majority of fans were all good, full of energy and passion for the exciting opener that was unfolding on the field. All it takes is about 300 fighting fools to make it a bad experience for 47,000 that were there to celebrate the opening of another baseball season.

Q. I read and enjoy many of your articles that you publish in the Star. I have a topic that I would like to cover among Blue Jay fans and team management and maybe you could lead the way on this topic; Blue Jays Logo. I was at the game yesterday with some friends and we were comparing the current logo with the original logo.

The current logo does not look appealing at all and for a sports team to build its brand and foundation a team must keep certain aspects of its organization the same, for example its logo. Teams like the Leafs, Yankees, Red Sox have had the same logo for many decades.

Many teams in professional sports keep the same logo where it eventually becomes a brand and is recognized globally. The Jays had its best years with its original logo and I think, as many other do, that the Blue Jays should bring back their original logo.

Thanks, Jiries N.

A. It's a nice thought, not uncommon among old-school baseball fans, but the Jays won't ever go back to the old logo for exactly the same reason they jettisoned the powder blue unis that they had favoured on Flashback Fridays the past few years.

The feeling at Rogers is the future is now. While Paul Godfrey as ex-club president in the early '00s tried unsuccessfully to boost the team's flagging fortunes by putting all his eggs in the basket of nostalgia, constantly honouring and celebrating the championship Jays of Paul Beeston and Pat Gillick from the '80s and '90s while downplaying the current teams much to that team's annoyance, new/old president Paul Beeston now back for a second tour, wants none of that sappy “the way we were” stuff.

Beeston would rather have fans look to the future as envisioned by his new GM Alex Anthopoulos which means, necessarily, having a new logo, new colours and a ban on Kelly Gruber sightings waving to fans from atop the dugout.

The other thing to consider about the ever-changing Jays' logo is that since the great strike of '94, Jays' swag in all of its incarnations, has been one of the lowest selling properties in baseball. They keep trying to come up with an idea that will change that trend and make the Jays logo a best seller again. Note to Jays. The idea is called winning. It's why the Yankees, Red Sox, Dodgers and Cardinals never feel the need to experiment.       

Q. A few years ago folks watching Jays home games on TV were shown via a roof cam whether or not a pitch was over the plate. Obviously this was not shown in the stadium. This feature has disappeared and I would like to have it back. Can you tell me why and ask if this service could be restored?

Lloyd Sayer, Amherstburg, Ont.

A. I could never understand, still can't understand why baseball is the only major sport that sets its officials up to fail. I don't agree with umpires often, but I'm with them on this one.

The high home overhead cameras to which you refer would always show if a pitch was slightly off the plate or caught the edges, but could not show high or low. If you want to know whether a pitch is a strike, pay attention to the man in street clothes standing directly behind the catcher.

Tip No. 1: If his right hand shoots up in the air and he bellows or grunts, then that is a strike. That's the final word, folks. But in the baseball playoffs, especially, you will see live on-screen, an omni-present strike box. As a pitch is delivered TV will show everyone at home where the pitch crosses the plate.

The MLB umpires are then in a can't win situation. If the pitch is shown as in the zone and the umpire calls it a strike, hey, it's supposed to be a strike, but if it is slightly off the square and a strike is called, woe to the umps.

Fans at home will throw their hands in the air and question the competency of the game officials. And, trust me, that happens a lot. To their dis-credit, baseball allows the judgment of its arbiters to be placed in doubt on every pitch.

Why would major-league baseball continue to allow this? Super slo-mo replays provide enough second-guessing. We don't need the high overhead shots to further second-guess and distract from the game because there is no depth perception and the angle of camera positions can be deceiving.    

Q. Hi Richard. Love the mailbag. I've noticed the new "pitchers bench" that was added to the Jays dugout and it had me wondering why they don't have more comfortable seats in baseball like they do in professional soccer? Those wood-looking community benches don't look very comfortable and the new pitchers bench has no back support. This probably isn't good when watching a four-hour baseball game. Soccer has individual comfy seats that are locked together with what looks like great lumbar support, not to mention they're pretty snazzy looking. Thanks for your thoughts.

Cameron Runte, Vancouver

A. The new backless wooden benches bolted to the floor, one at each end of the Rogers Centre dugouts about four human major-league butts wide, were installed along with the new protective nettings that have been placed as a safety measure at the top step on each side the length of the dugouts.

Prior to this, the Rogers Centre dugouts were prone to line drive foul balls being ripped in and scattering players, those that were even paying attention. It was a solid safety addition, but necessarily changed the sightlines for those sitting on the regular benches at the back of the dugout.

Now, with the new benches and the ability to drape your arms over the padded barrier and watch the game, there are fewer players left on the regular back benches as the game goes on. I do not believe that the comfort of the players, as per pro soccer, was of concern to anyone. Face it. The cameras never linger on the benches in soccer because it's not important. In baseball, within Jays' games, there's nothing that would piss off TV viewers more than having the home team down by four runs in the eighth inning and the cameras pan to the dugout to show players lounging back in padded seats with their lumbars all comfy, cozy.      

Q. Hi Richard. Your blog on baseball and first loves got me reminiscing. My first love actually taught me how to score a baseball game. She had a part-time job scoring for a men's recreational softball league. Since we were quite young it gave us a legitimate reason to spend time together. My question is that scoring is a lost art. Could you suggest to the Jays that they hand out scoring sheets to the crowd as a means to get more involvement and increase the knowledge level. As for the other scoring as I recall I was being waved home but missed the sign. Thanks.

Bo Buczko, Toronto

A. Scoring with ones girlfriend for four hours is indeed a lost art. I hate to always bring it back to what the Expos did -- I know fans get annoyed sometimes at all the back-in-the-day references -- but I agree with you about the Jays needing to find a way to make scorecards available to more fans.

What the Expos did at Olympic Stadium was, that with every game program sold, they included a four page scorecard insert with both teams’ rosters and a basic printed primer on the art of scoring.

The cardboard scorecard was loose but was included with the official $5 magazine. You could also buy just the scorecard itself for 50 cents, which was the key difference. It changed each series with updated rosters. That way if you were going to attend all three games of a series you didn't need to fork out the money for a new magazine every night just to score the games. If the Jays ever did have a scorecard available for even a dollar, more fans of all ages would learn to score and enjoy and understand baseball better. Being able to re-create a baseball game years later via the scorecard is a huge part of the sport's charm. 

Blue Jays mailbag: Opening Day and first loves

When the Jays open the 2011 season against the Twins on Friday, it will be this columnist's 39th major-league live-at-the-stadium home opener in a row, 22 with the Expos — the first four at Jarry Park, 18 at Olympic Stadium — and now 17 opening days covering the Jays at SkyDome/Rogers Centre.

 It always seems that last day, the final 24 hours before opening day bring on familiar, but uncontrollable emotional reactions. Comparison? Let's see, hmm. If I can remember that far back, it's like when you're young and carefree, getting ready for a highly-anticipated first night out, infatuated by a fresh, new love.

 You absolutely know how you would like the ensuing six months to turn out, minus the dog days, but it rarely happens the way you anticipated. Of course, that doesn't make it bad.

With either one, you're tied for first with everyone else, none of the exposed flaws you clearly know exist on display, just like in baseball. Your mind races, the mouth gets dry, the heart pounds out of control, contemplating the end-of-the-spectrum eventualities of success and failure that lie ahead.

In your mind's eye either thrilling scenario ends with a celebratory tangle of humanity at the moment of ultimate triumph — although one is in a packed stadium, the other behind closed doors.

Perhaps it's why  aspects of inter-personal relationships are commonly given clear baseball similes, like “reaching second base,” “rounding third and headed for home,” “missing the sign,”  “getting shut out,” “fantasy keeper,” “out in left field” or even “struck out.” (See Meat Loaf's iconic Paradise by the Dashboard Light).

The fact is Opening Day never gets old. The Jays are sold out. Play ball, gentlemen. On to the mailbag.     

Q. Why are the Jays putting Edwin Encarnacion back at third and moving Jose Bautista to right field. This move would make sense if they had traded Juan Rivera, but it does not make sense. The only reasonable explanation is that they want to strike fear literally into the Yankee and Red Sox fans who sit behind their dugout during the Yankee/Red Sox visits to Rogers Centre.

Jason Sinnarajah, San Francisco

A. The key for Encarnacion's fantasy owners is that whether his tenure at third base is long or short, the Jays had promised him before he signed his new contract that if healthy, he would get his chance for 600 at-bats. They just couldn't promise in what role that would be. The move of Encarnacion back to third base is baffling on the surface but understandable the more you think about it. The position shuffle, in fact, has a ripple effect on seven Jays' organization players – Encarnacion, Bautista, Rivera, Adam Lind, Juan Rivera, Brett Lawrie, Corey Patterson and Scott Podsednik.

One key is that when the Jays negotiated for the long-term with Bautista, the understanding was that he would be a right fielder as soon as they could make it happen. Jose said he had nothing to do with the sudden position change, that he was as surprised as anyone. Technically correct. This spring he hadn't said anything to put pressure on management but he didn't need to. They already knew his feelings.

Rivera is the man that doesn't fit the Jays' picture moving forward. His $5.25 million contract was what the Jays were taking on in the Vernon Wells trade more than Rivera the player.

It's like if in Da Vinci's famous mural The Last Supper there was a 13th apostle named Juan on the far right-hand side. The painting still works, but there's something just not quite right. The belief here with Rivera and the Jays is that he will DH and play the corner outfield until GM Alex Anthopoulos can find a new home for his bat. AA is willing to eat salary in order to clear the deck of Rivera, who just doesn't fit the big picture of what they are trying to do.

With Rivera gone, it opens a spot for outfielders Patterson and Podsednik, both currently injured. It also opens a spot for the 21-year-old Lawrie to be promoted and learn third base on a daily basis from the Jays' excellent major-league coaching staff. That then allows EE to get his at-bats as DH and backup first baseman, the original plan. The temporary move of the chronically scatter-armed EE to third base is also an affirmation of Lind's ever-evolving transition to first base.       

Q. Hi Richard. Should we be worried about Brett Cecil's loss in his fastball velocity? If so, how worried?

Mike S, Toronto

A. Yes we should be worried. Pitching coach Bruce Walton said that it happened two or three times last year and that Cecil's velocity always comes back. The excellent pitching coach had no theories on the cause. It's like waiting out the common cold. Cecil's fastball at its finest tops out at 90-92. Insiders say that his fastball speed this spring ranged between 86-91.

Finally, in his penultimate spring start, his frustration bubbled over. After yielding five runs in the sixth against the Braves including an absolutely crushed Dan Uggla bomb, Cecil, in a self-flagellating, post-game panic attack, had no explanation and questioned himself. Next time out, in his final spring tune-up, after a necessary session on Dr. Walton's psyche-soothing therapy couch, he had come in off the ledge and was speaking optimistically of hitting 91 m.p.h. once again. We don't know if that may have been Cecil merely whistling past the graveyard.

Recall last spring when Jason Frasor lost 2-4 m.p.h. off his fastball as the year opened. He lost the closer's role to Kevin Gregg before finally getting back to his usual 93-94 m.p.h. But it's easier to hide and adjust for a three-out reliever like Frasor than for an every-five-days starter like Cecil.

The Jays need everything to fall into place in order to compete with the .500 mark. Worry with Cecil is start-to-start, week-to-week. That could be enough to impact a Jays' season already on a tightrope.

Q. Hi Richard. I have read recent articles suggesting the Jays coaching staff is teaching Rajai Davis and Yunel Escobar to hit with more power. Is there a concern that Jays are giving up batting average for the sake of 5 more home runs? Top of the order guys need to get on base. You can only have so many guys who hit .240 with power.

David T, London

A. That's the misconception to what Jays' batting coach Dwayne Murphy is trying to accomplish. He's not teaching his students to hit with more power. He's teaching them to hit the ball hard. It works for everyone, including notorious non-power guys like John McDonald.

Consider the basic that in every six-pitch major-league sequence or plate appearance. He believes the pitcher is going to make one mistake or you are going to guess right one time on pitch, on location. Murphy is saying that whether that mistake or good read comes on the first pitch or the sixth pitch, the fact is your eyes should light up and you should crush that pitch. It's the best one you're likely to see.

In past years, as McDonald describes his own awakening, he would take that juicy pitch if it was early in the count because he didn't play often so he felt his goal was to see pitches and make the opposing pitcher work. He would arrive at two-strikes and have to defend his zone and adjust to pitcher's pitches.

In fact, Murphy's philosophy should not breed lower batting averages, although it's likely to lead to lower on-base averages. The explanation for a guy like Bautista drawing 100-plus walks is that Murphy preaches the discipline to not chase pitches out of the zone and the further fact is when you're a 50-homer guy, pitchers tend to try and make you chase with balls off the plate. If you don't chase, you walk.   

Q. Hi Richard. How does Adam Loewen fit into the organization's plans for the future? Is there a chance he'll get back to the "show" after his injury? We never hear anything about him.

Domenic Jannetta, Toronto

A. The Jays signed outfielder Loewen early in the winter and left him off the major-league 40-man roster, exposing him to the Rule 5 draft where every other team passed. Loewen saw a lot of game action with the major-league Jays at spring training and impressed manager John Farrell with his raw athleticism and his upbeat attitude. Here's a guy that's already been in the majors as a pitcher trying to fight his way back as an outfielder. Think Rick Ankiel. He will go to Vegas, where he and Eric Thames and David Cooper will have a chance to impress the Jays in a hitters' ballpark. He's solid inventory.

Q. Hey Richard. What's your take on Yunel Escobar? He seems to fly under the radar, but I think he's poised for a fantastic season with all-star potential.

J Koops, Hamilton

A. There are moments when you see flashes of what frustrated the Braves so much about the talented young Cuban shortstop. There was the ball he drove to right centre that he thought was going to be caught in the alley but with a gale blowing out, it carried over the centre fielder's head to the fence. Two runs scored, but Escobar had been trotting out of the box and watching and even though he turned on the afterburners was thrown out at third.

But Escobar has something in Toronto that he didn't have with the Braves. He has Jose Bautista. After that out at third base, which was the third out, Escobar waited on the infield for his glove to be brought out. Bautista handed it to him and then quietly lectured him for 45 seconds while the pitcher warmed up and they took grounders from first base. Later in the game, Bautista hit a routine grounder to short and sprinted all the way through the bag. Point made. Escobar does have a chance to be an all-star. He's big, strong and talented on both sides of the ball.

Q. Richard, I hope I am wrong; however, I am not buying the Ricky Romero hype. Mostly because when he is 'off' he is really bad and does not often tough out hard wins. When his stuff is working he looks great but then he can look the exact opposite his next start. I thought it said something when he was bypassed for the opening day start last year - did the coaches feel the same and not trust his stuff? Love the Expos memories...keep it up.

Scott MacPherson, Calgary

A. At this point, Romero is less an ace than he is the No. 1 pitcher in the Jays' rotation. It's tough for any Jays' No. 1 in the rotation because memories of Roy Halladay in that role are still fresh. Romero is still developing. It must be remembered that just four years ago, in 2007 he was trying to find himself at AA-New Hampshire.

Just two years ago, in 2009 he was the final starter out of spring training and only because the other candidates took more of a late-spring step backwards than he did. He has come a long way in a short time, but still has much to learn. The Jays have a No. 1 starter but don't have an ace — yet.

Q. Hi Richard, I really liked the insights you wrote about Arencibia's level of readiness in last week's mailbag. The pressure must be very high on the kid. Speaking of kids, is there anything you can share about how Gary Carter handled the pressure as he became the No. 1 catcher in Montreal in 77, that JPA could benefit from? Thanks always.

Roland Jodoin, Calgary

A. The pressure on Arencibia would be higher if the Jays, after missing out on Rod Barajas, who spurned their offer to sign with the Dodgers, had not decided in December that they were going to stick with Arencibia and allow him all the rope he needed to develop in the spring and at the start of the season. He knows that and trusts their word.

The pressure would be greater if catcher Travis D'Arnaud was at AAA-Las Vegas rather than in New Hampshire. The pressure would be greater if manager John Farrell had not decided that Jose Molina could handle Kyle Drabek and Brandon Morrow allowing Arencibia a 3-of-5 work schedule to ease his way into being the starting catcher. The pressure would be greater if he had not had two years at Triple-A including last season's MVP of the PCL.

As for the Expos' Hall-of-Fame catcher Gary Carter, it didn't start out all gravy way for him either.

As a rookie Carter played a couple of seasons of rock-em-sock-em right field. The second year, the disastrous 1976, included a rib-crushing catch crashing into the short chain link fence at Jarry Park, missing significant time. When the Expos moved to Olympic Stadium, he moved behind the plate, but there were still pitchers that said they would prefer pitching to Barry Foote, still only 25-years-old. Carter's major problem early was that he was a bundle of energy and bounced around behind the plate instead of presenting a consistent target for his pitchers.

Another problem was that he tried too hard to be one of the guys as an early 20s major-leaguer. It didn't always work. He was trying too hard. There are parallels with Arencibia and if J.P. comes anywhere close to Carter's career, it would be great.   

Q. Hi Richard. I always look forward to your mailbag. Based on the likely Opening Day roster, how would rank the Blue Jays' defence? Will the loss of Overbay and Wells have a significant impact? I know that defence is very difficult to quantify, but other than McDonald and Bautista (and Snider, who I feel is underrated as a fielder) I don't have a lot of confidence in our team in the field, and worry about what effect this could have on our young starters. Am I way off-base?

David Wencer, Toronto

A. There is cause for concern as far as the effect of the Jays' defence on the young starting pitchers. The only two positions at which the Jays should be considered above major-league average are shortstop and right field and right field only because of the deterrent of Bautista's throwing arm. At this point the Jays could be considered below average at first base, third base and behind the plate.

Even if it's one extra out required per game because of a play not made, that's what adds pitches and stressful situations to young pitchers and could have a subtle effect on their statistics. To Rajai Davis from Vernon Wells in centre field is a good example. Wells was sublime, with early jumps and good reads, gliding to the spot and making it look easy. Davis is faster and more spectacular, but that's because he's always making up ground for the split second longer reaction time than Wells and the slightly-off route he may have started out on. Overbay's glovework will be subtly missed as well.    

Q. Has Scott Richmond had his moment in the sun or is there still a place for him in MLB? Also, since there's apt to be a fair bit of movement between here and Las Vegas during the season, tell us a little bit about who gets paid what and when. For example, if a player comes up for a couple of weeks to fill in for an injured regular and then is send down again, does he get paid the major league minimum while here and then reverts to the Triple A scale when he returns? And what is the Triple A scale these days? Thanks.

Jerry Lawton, Toronto

A. Richmond at the start of this spring had one healthy start in a Phillies B squad game and looked great. He was enthused afterwards. He was hitting 92 mph and spotting his breaking pitches for strikes. Then mid-spring he went through a dead-arm period and by the time he bounced back was optioned to Triple-A Vegas. In '11 there's a chance Jays' fans will see him later in the year, but in 2012 and beyond, he may have to find another team as the torrent of Jays' young starting pitchers sweeps over him.

As for salary, yes, any major-league call-ups during the year are pro-rated off of the minimum salary which is $400,000 plus a 2010 cost of living percentage bump.

The 40-man roster players have different rules for service time. Six-year free agent contracts are guaranteed and those players can't be sent out without their permission. Players who are arbitration-eligible are governed by minor-league options, but if they are sent out, their contracts stay at the major-league numbers. Players with five-plus years of service must give their permission to be sent out. Any player from pure rookie to arb-eligible players are generally working on split contracts where if they are sent to the minors, receive minor-league salaries for the time they are there, pro-rated. Triple A minimum is $32,500 for a rookie to that level and can reach $125,000 for certain veteran six-year minor-leaguers. It's a five-month season.

Blue Jays Q&A with Richard Griffin

Jays mailbag: A championship team needs ...

The Jays announced this week that they have sold out the home opener at the Rogers Centre on Friday, April 1 against the Twins which is proof positive that fans are buying into the two-year-old program of GM Alex Anthopoulos and President Paul Beeston.

There have been no unrealistic promises of contending this year but yet fans have responded to sell out – at least for the opener. For the first time in a long time, major-league baseball is opening the season on a weekend, something they should have done long ago.

How long the fans stay faithful and believe in their Jays is another story. Hey, the Leafs have surged into 10th place in the conference. Gotta plan the parade route.

The Jays have a rugged early-season schedule in April/May that includes 20 road games among the first 31 contests, with a west-coast swing and stops in New York, Texas, Boston and Tampa. It will be an interesting baseball season with a wide range of victory totals possible for a still-building home team.

For all you fantasy baseball experts the Canadian Baseball Hall of Fame has an interesting fundraising idea. The Hall and its president, Tom Valcke, have organized a pool in which fans can choose their own team of major-leaguers for the regular season and contribute $10 to the excellent, non-profit organization located in St. Marys, ON.

The 2011 pool is offering more than $1,200 worth of prizes, including a very unique prize to the champion - a limited edition special bat created by the Hall of Fame bearing the signatures of Canada's three MVPs, Larry Walker, Justin Morneau, and Joey Votto. Check it out online at http://baseballhalloffame.ca/ if you gert a chance.

On to the mailbag.  

Q. Hey Richard. Very much enjoy your insights into all things Blue Jays and MLB. Over here in the Middle East it's nothing but football (soccer) and cricket, sigh.

My question relates to the Jays' coaching staff. Given the changes and how instrumental they will be to a relatively young team, what are your thoughts thus far in spring taining and how do you think this coaching staff (manager included) matches up against other teams' coaching staffs? And finally, is there a coaching staff over the years in all of MLB that you would pay special tribute to? Thanks.

Paul M, Manama, Bahrain

A. This Jays' coaching staff is a teaching staff and that's what the Jays needed at this time. The manager John Farrell is a former pitching coach who knows that side of the game but also knows what kind of offensive teams gave his Red Sox pitching staffs trouble in preparing for them. That is why he wants to integrate an aggressive running gameplan into the Jays' offensive mix.

The pitching coach Bruce Walton is entering his second year as the main pitching guy after years as the bullpen coach. He knows his pitchers' individual personalities and cares about their health above all. The staff, especially the starters, are very close to each other and to their coach.

Hitting coach Dwayne Murphy gets much credit for Jose Bautista's dramatic power surge, but his philosophy of hitting the pitch you are looking for no matter when it comes in the pitch sequence has helped guys like John McDonald as well as the power guys. If it's not a pitch that you were expecting, just take it until you have two strikes. Murphy also has helped guys get ready on time and be in hitting position earlier to get the bat head out front for maximum power.

It's been a long time since the Jays have had a catching guy per se, but Don Wakamatsu has spent countless hours in discussion with rookie J.P. Arencibia, helping him with the finer points of the game. He is a former major-league manager with the M's.

Luis Rivera is in his first year with the Jays, but has been on a coaching staff at the major-league level with the Indians and has managed himself at AA-New Hampshire where he forged a strong relationship with guys like Kyle Drabek, Eric Thames, Adeiny Hechavarria and others. He is a former major-league shortstop and pays close attention especially to the middle of the infield.

Brian Butterfield's ongoing resume includes work with a young Derek Jeter in the Yankee system in the early '90s and continues today for his fourth Jays manager as a valuable instructor on the mental side and the mechanics of playing the infield. As a third-base coach, he's not afraid of challenging the defence by going first to third, second to home, but if his runner is thrown out, there's usually a calculated-risk explanation, depending on game situation, score, runner and defender.

The Jays have never really had a hands-on outfield instructor, but this spring Torey Lovullo has been tenacious with the outfielders, constantly hitting them groundballs in the outfield from behind a screen during batting practice, taking Travis Snider through exhausting throwing repetitions as other players shag during b.p. and preaching hitting the cutoff man, throwing to the right base and proper jumps and routes to flyballs. Lovullo has nine years as a minor-league manager, the last five at Triple-A.

Pat Hentgen is a rookie bullpen coach working with a veteran bullpen. He will learn from Farrell and Walton and can contribute from his experiences as a Jays star and Cy Young winner. He knows he's learning but brings a mental preparation expertise to the task. At least four of these coaches could go on to become major-league managers. Not sure about the manager yet, but this is one of the best coaching staffs in baseball right now. It's hard to compare going back in time, but in this day and age, with players rushed through the minors, the need for a teaching staff is as great as it has ever been. That's what the Jays have.   

Q. Hi Rich. Adam Lind's conversion over to 1B seemed to be a big topic of discussion as spring training rolled around, yet I haven't read or heard much in terms of his development so far there. How has he progressed at that position, seeing as how opening day is less than two weeks away? Thanks.

Thomas Turniawan, Antigonish, NS

A. Lind's conversion has gone just about as expected for a man that has played the position before in college, but obviously not at this level. His best asset is handling throws in the dirt, although he fanned on a sinker from Yunel Escobar at shortstop on Wednesday night. His feeds to pitchers covering the bag have been good, far better than last year when he forced David Purcey into the air and he came down on the corner of the bag and sprained his ankle. He is better going towards the line to field groundballs, rather than going to his right. He is not graceful looking, but there are no style points. His throws to second base are not always precise, but he is not afraid of the throw.

Coach Brian Butterfield works with him constantly before practice and during batting practice hitting him countless groundballs and preaching footwork. The only criticism is that Lind did not take the knowledge of his impending position change to get a head start with the glove either at Instructional League or in any winter league.

Q. It seems like the prevailing rationale for keeping Jo-Jo Reyes in the running for the No. 5 spot in the rotation is his lack of options. Why should that drive the Blue Jays decision making? Why not base it solely on performance? It almost seems a bit unfair to Jesse Litsch -- a guy who seems recovered from injury and has more of an established track record.

Jay V, Petrolia

A. Manager John Farrell has called the lack of any remaining minor-league options when there's a decision to be made a “tiebreaker” that it only comes into play if there are two players of similar talent and one of them has options. Then he would go to the minors.

Farrell swears it will be the best 12 pitchers that break with the team and nothing else. That's a noble, very difficult goal, but it's what the Jays are saying. Guys with no options like Reyes and David Purcey are inventory and why would the organization want to give up useful inventory for nothing.

The more good players you control the better. There was an Expos player in the '80s who upon signing his first big contract decided his wife after wearing an outfit once should throw it out instead of having it dry cleaned. Sure she always looked good in new clothes, but was it the most efficient plan for her closet inventory over time? She  waived her wardrobe once a week without thinking about or worrying about the future. If you let a major-league player go right now because you have something similar on hand, that's short-sighted.

In any event, he 26-year-old Reyes has been a revelation at camp including his six strong innings vs. the Yankees on Wednesday. He has overcome knee injuries from the past to earn a spot on the roster. The Jays' lack of options, the lack of ability to send him out to the minors without passing him through waivers (where he would surely be claimed) was a factor, but his performance on the mound this spring meant that even without the injury to Brandon Morrow, Reyes was going to be on the team. It will be an interesting decision when Morrow returns to the rotation, but it's likely Reyes will stay.

Q. Richard. With David Cooper having such a strong spring, do you think that if the Adam Lind test at first base fails, could you see a Cooper promotion in May/June, and move Lind back to DH? With Cooper in the lineup it would add another left-handed bat to a right-handed heavy lineup. Do you think this would happen about the same time as a Lawrie callup?

Scott Cochrane, Niagara on the Lake

A. Edwin Encarnacion has been promised regular at-bats to re-sign with the Jays. If the Lind first-base conversion failed, Edwin would get the first shot.

David Cooper has certainly opened eyes this spring with John Farrell wondering out loud how a guy with his sweet swing was ever a .250 hitter in the minors. Cooper is just 24-years-old and just completed a second stalled season at AA-New Hampshire. However while hitting .257, he doubled his home run total of the year before to 20. At Tampa this spring he hit a bomb over the right field bleachers that landed on the concourse and bounced out into the street. He was selected 17th overall in the 2008 draft and that's a lot of pressure for a young player that starts out slowly in his career. In that draft, Brett Lawrie was chosen by Milwaukee 16th overall and Brett Wallace No. 13 by the Cards. The Jays had liked both those guys as their own first pick.

Q. Hi Richard. Love and look forward to this column every week! My question pertains to having multiple coaches. There is a lot of discussion on the effect Dwayne Murphy had on the majority of Blue Jays hitters last season. His philosophy has clearly helped the majority of our hitters, at least in terms of power production.

However, given that Adam Lind and Aaron Hill had a much worse showing last year, is it possible that Murphy's approach just doesn't work for everyone? I know there are a number of factors involved in a player's performance, but it seems unusual that there is a clear division between the players that performed best last season from those that excelled in 09. Perhaps this is just coincidence but I'm curious: has any organization toyed with the idea of having two hitting coaches? This would allow players to choose who they feel most comfortable receiving instruction from or to get a fresh perspective when they are slumping.

Ryan Brooks, Toronto

A. That's an idea whose time will never come. In 2009, Cito Gaston talked about having three hitting coaches on the team, Gene Tenace, Murphy and Cito himself. That only worked for the Jays because all three men were preaching the same message of going to the plate with a gameplan, looking for your pitch and hitting it as hard as you can no matter what the count. In 2010 Tenace left the staff and the basic message remained the same. In '09, both Lind and Hill had solid years. In 2010 they tailed off although each hit 20-plus homers. Good hitting is so much about the mental approach and going to the plate with confidence. Having two different hitting coaches borders on panic and lack of confidence.

Q. What part of the Blue Jays team do you think they need to improve in order to compete for a championship. I think the team looks really good but just needs sometime to mature.

Craig Robinson, Swift Current

A. The Jays need a stud No. 1 starter that has done it before, with 230-plus innings and regularly working seven innings per start. They had that man in Roy Halladay but that wasn't going to work anymore. When they traded him to the Phillies it meant taking a two-year step backwards. This is year two. That stud pitcher may be on hand but the Jays won't win anything until he steps up.

The Jays also need a reliable top of the order, first and second place hitters that set the table regularly for the 3-4-5 guys putting pressure on the pitcher and defence with the threat of speed, ensuring that an opponent can't pitch around the middle of the order because there are runners on base. The protection for Jose Bautista will come as much from those batting in front of him as from those batting behind. The Jays to win need a catcher that can lead a pitching staff with confidence but can also deliver some offence. J.P. Arencibia is supposed to be that guy, but is still working on all aspects of that description. 

Q. Recently it has been suggested that both Kyle Drabek and Brandon Morrow would benefit from throwing to veteran catcher Molina rather than rookie catcher J.P. Arencibia. Arencibia's struggling this spring, not only with handling breaking pitches and opposing baserunners, but also with his batting average that hovers around .100. Will Molina be sharing starting catcher duties with Arencibia as the 2011 season begins? What's the prognosis for Arencibia?

Andrew W.,Tampa Bay

A. It looks like Arencibia will begin the season catching games for Ricky Romero, Brett Cecil and Jesse Litsch, while Jose Molina will handle Kyle Drabek and the Morrow/Reyes combo. When Morrow returns and if Reyes is still in the rotation, Jo-Jo would likely go over to Arencibia. If that 3-of-5 thing continued all year it would give Arencibia about 97 starts behind the plate. That could change as the season goes along and he picks up the nuances that he lacks right now.

Defensively, Arencibia has been throwing well. He has boxed some balls around as a receiver, not because of an inability to handle breaking pitches but because he needed to soften his hands and relax. He is doing a better job at that as the spring goes along as well as improving his glove action at the bottom of the strike zone and getting away from stabbing at the ball giving umpires a bad impression of certain pitches, losing strikes for his staff. Defensively he is getting the hands-on treatment from coach Don Wakamatsu and can often be seen sitting at Molina's locker discussing catching. His hitting is the major issue right now, but the Jays are committed to him with no time frame. They point out how John Buck had a slow start for two months in 2010 and they stayed with him and he became an all-star.

Jays mailbag: St. Patrick's Day and the 12th anniversary of Johnson's exit

Happy St. Patrick's Day which, by the way, marks the 12th anniversary of Jays' manager Tim Johnson's spring training firing following his 88 win debut season with the Jays and the anniversary of Jim Fregosi being hired in 1999.

GM Gord Ash had continued to back his beleaguered manager all winter, including an uncomfortable week at the winter meetings in Nashville where Johnson's one-hour manager's interview session devolved into an embarrassing mea culpa.

Johnson had admitted to exaggerating his degree of service in the Vietnam era claiming in some clubhouse bull sessions with players that he had gone overseas.

His role, in fact, had been at Camp Pendleton training mortar artillerymen. But the whole thing wasn't going to work.

It got so bad at spring training in Dunedin with snide comments behind Johnson's back both in the clubhouse and on the road, including Jays' newly acquired lefthander David Wells going on the Bubba the Love Sponge Morning Show and regularly ridiculing his skipper that Ash decided that the change had to be made in a St. Patty's Day Massacre.

Major League Baseball umpires like officials in all pro sports are looked upon as a necessary evil.

However, I have known a lot of umpires personally through the years and away from the field in relaxed social settings, most of them are funny, charming, smart and family oriented. Of course we don't want to generalize because there are others that are total pinheads — probably in the same ratio as in any other segment of life.

MLB umpires are currently trying to get the word out about their online auction that they are conducting on behalf of their charity, UMPS CARE.

The online auction began on March 9 and goes until this Sunday, March 20.

There are some great items, more than 200 up for bid that include a ton of signed memorabilia, VIP experiences, golf, hotel stays and more.

All of the money goes to fund the UMPS CARE initiatives, which benefit children (hospital visits/Build-a-Bear workshops for children with serious illnesses and VIP game experiences for children awaiting adoption are two). Visit: http://www.umpscare.com/index.php for more information.

Now, to the questions:

Q-Richard,

With Brett Lawrie showing his natural ability on the ball diamond what are the chances he leaves spring training as the starting 3B and move Bautista back to RF? If Lawrie is as talented as we think, doesn't he seem to be of the same breed as A-Rod, Pujols, Heyward, with that being said, age shouldn't come into play as those 3 examples all started the careers at a young age like Lawrie. I know he will probably start in AAA but wouldn't our lineup be stronger with him at 3B and Bautista in RF?

Scott C.,Niagara-on-the-Lake

 

A-Sure, the Jays could easily make the decision to begin the season with Brett Lawrie at third base and live with the learning curve that he requires at third base from a positioning, react-to-the-ball-off-the-bat, still-needs-his-reps type thing. But they likely won't. Manager John Farrell is a huge and important supporter of Lawrie in the majors. The rest of the non-uniformed organization is more cautious. He has made some nice plays at third base, including flawless feeds right on the money to start double plays and many going to his left. Part of the reason for sending him to Vegas, of course, is that three weeks in the minors would ensure that Lawrie remains under Jays' control through 2017 instead of 2016. A player needs six full years to earn free agent status. A full season is 172 days of accumulated time. The 2011 season is 181 days long. Another part of the reason for farming him out is that they need to find a landing spot for current right fielder Juan Rivera, the Jays' version of brown shoes with their opening day tuxedo.

Rivera does not fit the Alex Anthopoulos criteria. He is not young, he's not controllable and the reason they even have him is that the Vernon Wells transaction needed to be made in order for the Jays' financial flexibility moving forward and Rivera's $5.2 million 2011 salary was part of what the Angels insisted the Jays take on. Currently the Jays starting outfield of LF Travis Snider, CF Rajai Davis and RF Rivera may rank 14th among 14 AL outfields. Check out any Fantasy Baseball preview magazine and look for Jays' outfielders in their 2011 rankings. As soon as you moved Bautista back to right field, with the Lawrie move to start at third base, the outfield rank would rise considerably.

It's probably unfair at this stage to Lawrie to compare him to A-Rod, Albert Pujols and Heyward at the same age. None of those three players was changing positions in the year they reached the majors and by the time they were 20 or 21, due to where they grew up, I would safely estimate they had far more repetitions on both sides of the ball than has Lawrie has, even growing up in the baseball hotbed of British Columbia and participating in the various Baseball Canada programs. If you're asking what I would do, I would send Rivera to another team and pay a large portion of his salary and I would install Lawrie at third base and bat him ninth. We've all at one time or another had to learn on the job.  

Q-Hello Richard,

Much has been made of the Jays selection of Romero over Tulowitzki- including DiManno's recent article. How would the first 7 or 10 picks in that draft look today based solely on the player and not the selecting team's needs?

Thanks,

Martin, Edmonton

A-Here's one man's rankings, using the advantage of 20-20 hindsight, of the Top 12 first round picks from the 2005 draft. I'll put an asterisk next to the guys that were selected after Ricky Romero: 1-*Troy Tulowitzki (Rox); 2-Ryan Braun (Brewers); 3-Justin Upton (D'backs); 4-Ryan Zimmerman (Nats); 5-*Clay Buchholz (Bosox); 6-*Matt Garza (Twins); 7-*Jacoby Ellsbury (Bosox); 8-Romero; 9-*Colby Rasmus (Cards); 10-Jay Bruce (Reds); 11-Andrew McCutcheon (Bucs); 12-Alex Gordon (Royals).  

Q-Hi Richard,

Always look forward to your insights, especially off-field things we'd have no other way of knowing. Two questions: First, have the Jays considered inviting Jimmy Key as a guest instructor? He'd be great with some of the left-handed starters, especially if he could teach them his borderline-legal pick-off move! Second, everyone always says Johnny Mac is a lousy hitter, but in about 150 at-bats last year he had 23 RBI. In 600 ABs, my simple math projects this to 92 RBI. Or, combining the last three years and extrapolating those 489 ABs up to 600 would give about 66 RBI. It's not great, but it's not terrible. Is he really that bad a hitter? He's certainly a great human being and a wizard fielder. Thanks!

Richard W., Toronto

A-As for former Jays' lefthander Jimmy Key, I have never heard his name mentioned around the Jays as even being interested in the prospect of teaching the organization's young pitchers. He had a great pickoff move which helped him control the opponent's running game, but whenever John Farrell looks for an example to teach his young lefthanders, especially Brett Cecil, in terms of a lefthander being in total control of the game, he points to Andy Pettitte. It's probably a better idea that a young pitcher has seen the guy pitch and Jimmy retired in '98. Some guys just have no interest in coaching.

John McDonald is a much better hitter now than when he first joined the Jays from the Indians. A lot of credit for his early improvement should go to former Jays' hitting coach Mike Barnett. McDonald is what he is. That is a guy that can fill in nicely off the bench for a game or two, but that you don't want starting for a prolonged period. He reaches 10 years in the majors sometime in May. That's a pretty good career for a guy with his limited hitting ability. That's really good for him and his family and he's a great human being, one of the best...but, he's not a good hitter.

Q-I know it's just Spring Training but Brett Lawrie has looked really good so far, what is the chance of him making the team in April or is he looking like a September call-up? I have a friendly wager with a buddy that he will be called up after July 1st, am I going to lose $100?

Matt S., Toronto

A-For his chances of making the team out of the spring see the first question today. As for your bet on being called up after July 1, you might have a better chance of winning if you specified “before July 1.”

Q-Hi Richard:

Why would the Twins give up a good young starter such as Kevin Slowey?

Stu, Erin, Ont.

A-They haven't. The problem in a lot of major-league camps is that outside observers look at a club's areas of depth and ask themselves how their club could possibly use that perceived depth to shore up another perceived weakness on the roster. So when the Twins had what seemed like six major-league-ready starters in the rotation and a lack of experienced relievers in the bullpen and when two Jays' pro scouts showed up at a B Game in which Slowey was getting his work in, 2+2 became 5. Six starters is not depth. Ten starters is depth. There are injuries and failures to launch that occur every year in the majors and if you don't have guys in the minors ready to step in, then you aren't going to compete. The Jays currently have three top starters, plus four guys competing for the final two spots. That's seven starters, plus in the minors they will have pitchers on the rise like Zach Stewart, Henderson Alvarez, Chad Jenkins, Deck McGuire, plus holding-tank guys like Brad Mills and Robert Ray. That's more like the depth required to trade a starter for bullpen help.  If a Slowey deal ever happened, good for the Jays, but unnecessary.

Q-Hey, Richard:

Love to pick your brain on M.L.B. rules involving player movement, so here we go again. This young Dominican pitcher that A.A. is trying to find a way to hang onto has 'run out of options' at the ripe old age of 22. I presume that's because Boston signed him at 17? Are these kids that teams sign from countries not subject to the draft subject to the same rules as U.S./Canadian kids (i.e. after 5 years go on the 40-man roster or be exposed to waivers? Will the same thing apply to the two Venezuelan kids the Jays signed last year. Why didn't the Jays go that route with Hechevarria?

I was in Dunedin last spring, partly because you made it sound so good (and it was!), & this year I'm in Phoenix. With the exception of not getting to see my beloved Jays, this is even better!

Bruce S., Courtenay, B.C.

A-Young lefty Cesar Cabral did not run out of options with Boston, but as you point out, since he had not been added to the Sox' 40-man roster after he had been a professional for five years he was eligible for the Rule 5 in December. The three options are just for roster players. If Cabral had been on the Red Sox roster, he would not have been eligible for the Rule 5 from which he was plucked by the Rays. But if he had been on the Sox' 40-man, as soon as they sent him to the minors this spring that would have become his first option. He could move up and down all year and it would still only be one option.

As far as the Jays' Venezuelans are concerned, it depends upon the signing dates when the clock starts. My understanding is that they have until the end of the 2015 season and then they must be protected on the 40-man or exposed to the Rule 5. Hechavarria is a different story. He was signed to as major-league contract due to the fierce competition for his services. He is signed for four years, through 2013. The club has already used one option and now having optioned him to AA-New Hampshire have exercised a second. If they send him to the minors again in 2012, then he's out of options for 2013 and must make the major-league team or be exposed on waivers. Once he starts playing for the Jays, then his service time accumulates just like any other player in terms of arbitration and free agency, but because of his original major-league contract, he's had a head start in terms of being held down in the minors.   

Q-Richard:

Do you see 1B/OF as a possible future destination for J.P. Arencibia?

Good hitting catchers have been moved in the past to save their knees (Biggio, Delgado)

Jamie N., Brooklin, Ont.

A-The Arencibia question is a good one. The Jays have some good catching prospects coming up through the farm system led by Travis D'Arnaud who is slated to start the year at Double-A New Hampshire. If Arencibia's bat is for real as demonstrated by his PCL numbers at Vegas in 2010, then they will have to find a place for him to play. It's not a bad thing having a catcher with that offensive capability – see Mike Piazza. It's not bad having two catchers with major-league ability on your team – see Anaheim Angels. But at some point you have to make a decision. Trading one guy is possible. It's too early to predict for Arencibia and the Jays, but first base would be more likely than outfield if they decided to keep both he and D'Arnaud with a third catcher brought in to back up.

Q-Richard,

What is the latest update from Dustin McGowan?

Tom Z., Richmond Hill, Ont.

A-I wrote about McGowan's latest mound session at minor league camp on Monday. He is on the 60-day DL but that makes no difference to his status. He can still stay at extended camp in April and continue to work at coming back. He can pitch in all the minor league games he needs but if he pitches for one of the affiliates his rehab-option time starts to add up. McGowan if he ever returns will come back as a reliever and has accepted the organization's decision. The thought being that the pitches from 80-110 as a starter are more fatigue-inducing, maybe damaging than 10-20 pitches in one inning, even doing that every two days. McGowan is a gamer who won't give up the dream and to the Jays' credit they have not given up on him as they did Chris Carpenter, which came back to haunt them as he won Cy with the Cards. McGowan had elite stuff before the injuries, but the results were not that elite even when healthy so expectations if he is able to complete his unlikely comeback should be tempered. Just seeing him on the mound in a major-league game again would be emotional, because July 8 will mark the third year of not pitching in a regular-season pro game at any level. That's tough.

Q-Hi Richard,

Expanding on a question from last week, is there any minor leagues that play without a DH as does the National League? Or is the NL the only professional league that doesn’t use the DH?

Cheers,

Jeff Jay, Haliburton, Ont.

A-The Japanese Central League and the National League are the only pro leagues that have pitchers in the batting order. The Golden Baseball League (Independent) based in California did, but they have merged with other independent leagues and have been swallowed up by the DH rule. I used to be a big NL supporter with no DH, but it's becoming ridiculous to have kids come to the majors because of their arms and then be handed a bat. It's sad to lose the purity of the game, but it's time.

Q-Hi Richard,

I'm discussing the Kevin Slowey from the Twins possibility you made the point that if the Jays did acquire him it would be to set up another deal in moving one of their starting pitchers. My question is why are you so comfortable with Romero (ace not doubt), Morrow (170 inning pitch limit), Cecil (a good 3rd at least for sure), but then 2 huge questions marks in Kyle Drabek (never done anything in the show before), Litsch, Z, Reyes? In my opinion they have 3 good starters but I am worried that one will end up on the DL at some point, and then many question marks beyond them.

Thanks,

Mike, Cambridge, Ont.

A-I'm comfortable with that five-man rotation because the Jays as an organization are continuing to insist they are setting up for 2012 and beyond and really need to find out about Drabek, Zep. Jo-Jo and Litsch. It's not to say they're tanking in 2011, but if they replaced one of those back-of-the-rotation guys with Slowey, having to give up solid parts because the Twins aren't going to give him away, what does that accomplish. However if the Jays keep Slowey in the rotation and then move a guy like Cecil for something good, then it makes sense. I would not make the Slowey trade if I was running the Jays.

Q-Hi Richard,

What's your take on Eric Thames? He seems to be an under-the-radar young talent who's developing quickly. Could we see this guy make an impact with the Jays anytime this year? The outfield is probably the weakest area for the team right now, is there an opportunity for him to see some time?

Colin W., Mississauga, Ont.

A-Eric Thames has been an eye-opener at camp this spring, so much so that heading into the weekend he leads the Jays in Grapefruit League at-bats. Defensively he's a work in progress and can only play left field, but with just two left-handed bats in the starting lineup and with only Corey Patterson as a projected bench player from the left side, I could easily see Thames spending some major league time at some point this season. In his second year at Pepperdine, the most beautiful campus in America, Thames was being heavily scouted by the Red Sox and Yankees and should have been at least a second-round pick. He had torn a hamstring in Junior College and late in his next draft year tore a quadriceps that dropped his value down to the 7^th round where to his credit, J.P. Ricciardi's Jays took a chance. Thames is now a yoga freak for flexibility and strength, cutting back on his weight training, and it has paid off. This past winter, he studied YouTube video of Jose Bautista and others to get prepared for his swing earlier and has been great this spring.

 

 

 

Jays mailbag: Lawrie shows he's close, very close

The Jays have had a relatively injury free spring thus far and that has as much to do with youth as it does anything else.

John Farrell on Wednesday insisted that he feels he has a solid offensive nucleus at every position and that allows flexibility, meaning that he could afford to carry one or two light-hitting or slumping bats in the lineup.

That being said, there is thankfully room for the classy John McDonald on occasion filling in around the infield, or room for a struggling J.P. Arencibia out of the chute even combined with the ever-light hitting Jose Molina.

They can afford to be patient with one or two slumps.

An interesting exercise, though, is to go around the diamond offensively and ask the question: Who would the Jays miss the most if he was injured or disabled for a significant period of time.

At catcher, Molina could take over from Arencibia and they would eventually find a way to promote Travis D'Arnaud, depending on how far into the season it was.

If Lind went down at first base, Edwin Encarnacion could handle it.

If Jose Bautista was injured it would speed the promotion of Brett Lawrie.

If any of the outfielders or the DH went down, that means Scott Podsednik or Corey Patterson could step up, or else they would do the Bautista/Lawrie position/promotion shuffle again.

But right now, the toughest Jays to replace for any significant length of time are the two guys up the middle in Yunel Escobar and Aaron Hill. Johnny Mac could fill in but eventually they would need to find an option that can provide more offence and still play major-league D. There is talent in the minors at the middle infield positions, but is it ready for prime time?

On to the mailbag.

Q. Hey Richard! I am really enjoying being able to read the boxscores again!! Spring is in the air!

I read a piece today that Kevin Slowey might be on the trade block in Minnesota. I also seemed to remember that they had been kicking tires on Jason Frasor last year. Any chance of the Jays going after another young (26), controllable (2 more years of arbitration) starting pitcher?

Also, have you heard any rumblings on a possible deal for a third baseman, or a new home for Juan Rivera?? Enjoy the Florida sun!

Jon Empringham, Woodstock

A. As for the case for acquiring Slowey, see the blog item I posted on Wednesday evening.

Sure the Jays have an overabundance of bullpen guys, but remember that the Twins did not value Jon Rauch enough to re-sign him during the winter, so now would he be among the type of guys that they want to give up their sixth starter for.

The 26-year-old Slowey is a guy with major-league credentials, but in the long term is he even a better fit with the Jays than some of the guys fighting for the fourth and fifth starter's spots right now?

As I say in the earlier blog posting, it would make some sense for the Jays if it was setting up another move for GM Alex Anthopoulos involving another current starting pitcher.There are no fresh rumblings about a trade for a third baseman.

I believe that the coaching staff is really high on Brett Lawrie's future and the future is near. I believe that Juan Rivera is merely keeping the right field seat warm for the day in mid-season when Lawrie is promoted to play third base and Jose Bautista is shifted back to right. That is the alignment that Jays' fans want to see sooner rather than later. That is the alignment that will be part of the contending Jays in a year, moving forward.

Forget about trading for a third baseman. The future of the position is already here.

Lawrie has been impressive this spring, making plays that nobody thought he was prepared to make, yet.

Q. Hi Richard. So one of the guys that seems to be getting a lot of play and doing well with the Jays this spring training is Eric Thames. What do you think his chances are of filling the hole at first base at some point this season?

Jon Weier, Toronto

A. Eric Thames has opened eyes this spring and is etting a lot of playing time. The northern California native had a great year at AA-New Hampshire in 2010 and then worked on his own with an unusual batting coach, YouTube, over the off-season, checking out videos of Jose Bautista and J.P. Arencibia among others watching for an improved timing, getting prepared earlier, the key to J-Bau's tremendous power surge.

He is not the fastest runner, the most powerful hitter, hit for the highest average, the best defender or have the best arm, but he does everything well enough to play in the majors at some point.

I don't see him as a first baseman, but he will make it as an outfielder at some point. Nice kid too.

Q. How patient are the Jays going to be in regards to Hill's poor hitting average?? One month? Two months? Or the entire season?

Brian Saville, Peterborough

A. The key with Hill will be whether the Jays decide to pick up his options for 2012-14, which they have to decide by Opening Day.

If they wait until the season starts, then they must decide by the start of next year's free agent deadline whether they want to pick up 2012-13 options. If not he becomes a free agent after 2011.

My personal belief is that the Jays will let this year's deadline pass and then they will watch Hill as if it is a free agent year for him. The pressure, albeit a positive pressure, will be on the player and therefore, I believe they need to stick with Hill as a starter all year, no matter the struggles, and see what they have moving forward.

If they benched him in a season in which they are trying to find things out, that would be counter-productive.

Many players take a deep breath and play their best when they know they are playing for the next contract. Basically that is where Hill would find himself if the Jays decided not to pick up all three years of the option by April 1.If he plays well, they can lock up the reasonable option years through 2013 and play it by ear after that.

Q. How has David Purcey looked? Everyone seems ready to annoint him as the Scott Downs replacement, but Jon Rauch and Frank Francisco fare pretty well against left-handed batters too. Is Purcey going to be consistent enough to be counted on over the course of a season?

Jason Sinnarajah, San Francisco

A. People should remember that at 29, which is the age Purcey will be pitching at this year, not even Scott Downs had become the replacement for Scott Downs. It wasn't until he was 31 that Downs became the reliable lefty specialist and part-time closer that he became.

Purcey in his last appearance walked all three batters that he faced, but that is the battle that he always has. He needs to be more consistent so that in game situations the manager can rely on him to come in and throw strikes.

Manager John Farrell addressed the Purcey question on Wednesday: “It comes down to consistency. You can look back to a number of different relievers. If they become an everyday reliever or more established reliever it can happen at all stages. Some come later. Some come earlier. We're not near the spot where we're going to turn the page and give up on him. We just have to get him in a position to deliver more consistent strikes.”

Regarding having a second lefty Farrell said: “It would be helpful, particularly when you look at our division. To go in without some depth left-handed is a little bit of a naked feeling. That doesn't mean we're going to take left-handers just for the sake of taking left-handers. We'll take the best pitchers, but with some balance we're probably a better team.”

As for righties that get lefties out, Francisco is one but he's going to close. Carlos Villanueva and Shawn Camp are pretty good, also. As for a second lefty, maybe Marc Rzepczynski or Jo-Jo Reyes. The other plethora of lefty guys have been pitching themselves out of the picture as time goes by.

Q. I wish that MLB would go to the DH everywhere, as pitchers never hitting in the minors makes them extra useless in MLB.

Drop The Gloves, via Twitter

A. I believe that as long as Bud Selig is the commissioner that the DH will never be a part of NL play. But of course he's leaving office as early as next year. The next guy in that office may consider it but not before the next Basic Agreement is negotiated, not the one that expires in 2011.

I used to be a NL supporter of no DH all the way, but after being in the AL covering the Jays and the World Series for 17 years now, I have turned around and believe one set of rules is the only answer and since the union will never allow the DH to be banished (they are usually high-priced veteran guys that help set the salary bar at a higher level) then I am all for the DH everywhere.

Most pitchers are athletes, but the fact that from high school through the minors has the DH makes it silly to make them hit in the majors.

Q. Hi Richard. When anyone brings up the benefits of the Blue Jays being in the AL Central you always point out that the Blue Jays would lose out on revenue by reducing the number of home games against the Yankees and Red Sox.

While this is true, I feel that the reason for the terrible attendance at Rogers Centre is not only the lack of playoffs since 1993 but also the lack of meaningful games in August or September since that time. It appears that fans have simply lost hope with the Blue Jays and it is hard to argue against that.

If the Jays were in the Central I find it difficult to believe that they would not have made the playoffs at least a few times in the last two decades.

Every year games would actually mean something as it would not be a foregone conclusion that they would miss the playoffs. Give the fans hope and I would think that instead of having crowds of 11,000 against less desirable teams the crowds would probably at least be in the 20,000 or above range thereby more than offsetting the effect of having the Yanks and Red Sox here 6 less times per year. Do you agree that Jays fans have lost hope (remember it has been two decades)?

Greg Huzel, Winnipeg

A. Jays fans have not lost hope. Hope is just hiding out in the witness protection program.

Fans were brainwashed under the J.P. Ricciardi/Paul Godfrey regime into blaming the Red Sox and Yankees and their huge payrolls for the competition woes that the Jays have had.

In the meantime, other medium payroll teams have gone on and advanced to the World Series from the American League.

The new regime of Alex Anthopoulos/Paul Beeston believes that if you've got to beat these guys anyway to get to the Series, why not play in the same division and just outwork, outscout asnd outsmart them. It can be done. The problem with believing that being in contention in August will increase attendance significantly is that historically it's never happened before.

The Jays need to reach the playoffs and then they will be able to sell tickets in that next offseason and have 1.6 million sold by Opening Day. You can never rely on the walkup crowd to make your attendance; it's the pre-sales, season and groups, areas that the Jays have struggled with since the '94 strike.

Q. Richard, A comment and a question. I spent a week at spring training this year and I'm sold. I want to do it every year.

I recommend checking out the Jays (meagre) practice facility. Fans can really get up close and interact with the players. In fact I snuck into their gym and got the clubbies to give me some free Jays paraphenalia. But that's a long story. Great trip all around.

Do you see the Jays giving Lawrie the third baseman gig? He's done nothing but impress thus far at camp, and he looks like the hardest working guy on the roster.

Peter Maslow, Hamilton

A. Hey, I have never been able to sneak into the gym. I am jealous.

As for Lawrie, I have a feeling there is a significant voice in the coaches room and front office that would love to see him in the majors sooner rather than later.

He is a pure athlete and so the transition to third base has seemed effortless. He makes that quick feed to second base as well as anyone I 've seen in a while and has good baseball instincts. He works hard and prepares hard.

So what if one time somebody duct taped huge vats of liquor to his hand. Who hasn't had that happen? My thinking is that will let him get his feet under him at AAA-Las Vegas and then bring him up and move Jose Bautista back to right.

Q. Dear Richard: My family will be vacationing in southern New Hampshire and Boston in August. We have already purchased Fisher Cats and Red Sox tickets. Do you know of any restaurants or other attractions in and around both Manchester, N.H., and Boston, Mass., that we should experience?

Paul Raphael, Mississauga

A. The best idea is to log onto a website like www.HelloManchester.com and see what strikes your fancy. Eric Thames spent last summer there and described it as “like Boston in the woods”. Thames said everything is “wicked this and wicked that with a lot of Sam Adams beer.” As for Boston, the Paul Revere Trail and Harvard University are can't miss. The original Cheers bar is disappointing. Fenway Park and the surrounding neighbourhood with its famed restauraunts and bars are wicked.

Jays mailbag: Inside the Michael Young trade demand

One of the wonderfully unique aspects of major-league spring training is to wander around the camps of the long-established iconic franchises and see the old-time superstars of the game in uniform, wanting to help out, wanting to stay connected, always eager to stop and chat baseball. For many former greats, baseball is for life.

Such was the case at Tigers camp in Lakeland on Tuesday, standing out near the home clubhouse in the right field corner watching the rain pelt down and having Hall-of-Fame outfielder Al Kaline push through the door and wander by a group of Toronto scribes, in full uniform.

I shook his hand and asked Kaline his thoughts about the late Duke Snider. It should be noted that Snider and Kaline shared the stage in 1980, when both were greeted to Cooperstown and baseball immortality.   

“Duke was a great gentleman,” Kaline said. “When you go into the Hall at the same time, you sort of get a bond between the two of us. We got to be pretty close and for the couple of years he came back (to Cooperstown) it was always great seeing him. He was a super guy, just a great man.”

“The ability to treat people with respect is just the way I've always seen him. He was perceived as a real friendly guy and he appreciated the fact that he was able to play baseball. In New York, in the heyday of baseball (with three teams) it was Mickey, Willie and The Duke. It was a great song and it was tremendous for him to be compared to those two great players.”

There is no doubt that 1980 was a great year for the Hall-of-Fame.

On to the mailbag.

Q. This is not about the Blue Jays but rather your article on Duke Snider...a man who along with Gordie Howe, was my childhood hero. Here's a little story that tells all about the Duke. When my son was 10 years old, I planned to take he and his pals to an Expos game. On a whim, I checked the Montreal telephone directory and lo and behold, there's Duke Snider's name and number. (Now tell me, how many celebrities list their contact information in the phone book? Most are hiding their identity.) Anyway, Duke agreed to meet me, my son and his pals before the game, he spoke with the kids, signed their baseball gloves and overall, was just a great guy (not to mention giving me a thrill). A real gentleman and a great player.
Paul Newman, Oakville

A. I have thought further about Duke Snider, the person, and what likely made him so revered and respected. He is not unique in what he did in social situations, but is still special as a sports icon. I'm a keen observer of life and there are a lot of celebrities who treat people well in one-on-one conversation by self-effacingly, with doses of false humility, taking a step down, trying to convince their audience that, hey we're all the same, we all put pants on one leg at a time. That's good but when the moment is over, they know it's not true.

There are other celebrities like Duke Snider who was comfortable with his status in life as a sports hero and didn't try to hide it. He tried to share it. For the short time they are together, athletes like Duke elevate their new friend du jour to their own level and make them feel for a shining moment that they also are very special, more important than when they entered the room. Duke never apologized for celebrity and was always willing to share it generously. 

Q. Richard. Your story on the 'Duke' was superb, I listened for years to Dave & Duke on CFCF in Montreal and he was a great announcer and 'colour commentator'. It is truly a shame that he won’t make the Hall of Fame with Dave Van Horne. As an old Dodgers fan, the Duke must be close to the last of the Brooklyn players left. It’s always sad to say goodbye to those players who meant so much to us when we were growing up.
David Delcloo, 
Kingston

A. What's amazing to me is that the list of Expos' TV analysts before Duke Snider included Don Drysdale, Pee Wee Reese and Jackie Robinson. That's a pretty impressive list. As far as the remaining living Dodgers from the final Brooklyn team in 1957 before they moved to Los Angeles, that list includes a higher total than you might imagine: Charlie Neal, Gino Cimoli, Don Zimmer, Randy Jackson, Joe Pignatano, Jim Gentile, Rod Miller, Don Newcombe, Denny McDevitt, Roger Craig, Sandy Koufax, Ed Roebuck, Carl Erskine, Ken Lehman, Bill Harris and Fred Kipp. As for Dodger fans, they are seemingly immortal.

Q. Hi Richard. Can you tell me why draft picks are never traded in baseball?
Thanks.
J. Fleming, Huntsville

A. I admire major-league baseball for not allowing the trading of draft picks. It would allow bad general managers to compensate for incompetence in scouting by trading their long-term choices for instant gratification thus burying their franchise in perpetuity.

Shrewd GMs could all of a sudden trade minor-league excess depth for future draft choices, while bad GMs could cover up incompetence with temporary Band-aid solutions.

In fact, the current system of free agency Types A & B is almost like trading picks. It's a system that allows teams compensation picks for lost free agents, helping teams that are losing players either obtain extra picks for their departing player or else have a floor of talent from which to operate in terms of trade demands.

For example at the July 31 trade deadline if you are looking to trade a Type A free agent for a half season, you know you must give up at least the equivalent of a late-first-round pick and a second round talent from your system. It won't change soon.

Q. Almost 20 years now since we had baseball in October. I would like to know who to blame for that. Was it Paul Beeston and Pat Gillick who, hot with recent success, lobbied for inclusion with the two-headed monster of the East or did that decision come out of the league? Flip the Jays and the Indians and Toronto gets a history of playoff races and good rivalries with Detroit, Chicago and Minnesota.
J Galli, Windsor

A. That's a very interesting question trying to trace the demise of the Jays since the strike in '94. The Jays won back-to-back World Series in 1992-93 then came the strike and the change in division and playoff structure.

Since the addition of two teams to the MLB playoff hunt in 1995, the brainchild of Bud Selig, in the ensuing 16 years only the Yankees have ever won back-to-back World Series (1998-2000).

As for Beeston or Gillick being at fault in deciding they wanted to join the AL East, I would prefer to blame world geography for the alignment that has the Jays tilting at windmills. It's pretty well impossible to argue that Detroit or Chicago or Cleveland is farther east than Toronto. I Googled it.

Besides, both former Jays executives realized that nine home games with the Red Sox and the Yankees each could make their attendance numbers sing, which is worth more than the possibility of winning a wild-card in the weaker AL Central. There would be no guarantees in that circumstance, ether. The fact is even with a second wild card being hypothetically added going back to '95, the Jays give the standings would only have made the playoffs once.   

Q. Hi Richard. A few weeks ago, you piqued my interest with the possible interest by the Jays in Michael Young. Whatever happened? Why did he remain with the Rangers if there is no home for him there? Love your column and thanks for your insights.
Ryan Maxwell, Meaford

A. The Jays were definitely interested in Young and inquired at the winter meetings in December after the Adrian Beltre signing by the Rangers. It would have been $48 million for the next three years, minus what the Rangers were willing to pay, but the Rangers had with sincerity told him they wanted him to be DH, super-sub. He is a clubhouse leader for the young Rangers. After that while the Rangers furtively explored trade options and pissed him off, the Jays remained on the periphery.

When Young found out about the back-door negotiations for his services, he then demanded a trade. The Rangers have tried hard to heal the wound and it seems under control, but if Jays' GM Alex Anthopoulos could find a good deal for his club, especially if it included a third team with multiple players, then he would go back to work. Young is not necessarily a Ranger for the opener.   

Q. After enjoying the NBA all-star festivities, it got me thinking about the MLB game. Why don't they try to mix things up by adding different skills competitions instead of just a home run contest? Why not get some of the other players involved, perhaps the most accurate throw from the outfield, or fastest around the bases? Any ideas?
Matt Hazel, Antigonish

A. I'm pretty sure that at a particular all-star game in the '80s there were other skills competitions than the Home Run Derby. If I recall correctly, someone got hurt by over-throwing or running too hard.

The extra baseball skills would be far more stressful and dangerous to valuable team properties as far as expensive players are concerned than the NBA's skill set. How do you hurt yourself by shooting three-pointers or throwing a bounce pass into a barrel? But running the bases and throwing from the corner, especially the length of time that TV draws out these events. The home run derby concept goes back to the days of Mickey Mantle and Henry Aaron as a TV event and the fact of the matter is the Monday ratings at the All-Star Game are great. If it ain't broke...

Q. Richard. Hope you're enjoying spring training in Florida. I see that Baseball America has released their top-100 prospects list. I'm interested in your take on the list. Kyle Drabek, Travis D'Arnaud, Brett Lawrie and Deck McGuire made the list. But Anthony Gose, J.P. Arencibia, and Adeiny Hechevaria were nowhere to be found. There were 15 pitchers rated higher than Drabek. Our top-rated prospect at No. 29 is the lowest we've had in a few years. Is our farm system truly on the upswing or is it overhyped?
Frank S, Toronto

A. First of all you have to consider that on a Top 100 list with 30 major-league teams that the average per organization would be 3.33 players per organization. The Jays have four.  So it would be pretty tough to be that much far above the average considering the Jays' farm system in the recent past has been ranked in the 20s out of 30 for the past four years. For me, in the top 100 prospects, I would have five Jays – Drabek, Lawrie, Gose, Arencibia and Hechavarria. It's a very hit-and-miss list almost as tough as when you are drafting players...but not quite. D'Arnaud is very mobile and athletic behind the plate but has a long way to go offensively and rating him in the Top 100 is a leap of faith. Arencibia has already been PCL MVP and should be rated ahead of him. McGuire is a nice prospect but has a lot to learn and before he approaches the majors and may in fact be passed by the more experienced Zach Stewart and a bunch of other Jays' 2010 June picks, some of whom were invited to minor-league mini-camp. Regular readers know how strongly I feel about Gose's future. Good kid. Good player.  

Q. In your years since covering the team as a columnist, would you say that (in Travis Snider, Scott Podsednik, Corey Patterson, and Juan Rivera) this is the weakest of all Jays' outfields, as far as home run power and offence/arm-strength is concerned?
Darrell Holtze, Guelph

A. You forgot about Rajai Davis. However I don't think the addition of Davis improves the scenario for the outfield in the skill areas you describe. Without the departed Vernon Wells and without third baseman Jose Bautista in the Jays' outfield, at the moment it is not very good. This group in any Fantasy League advice magazine does not feature an outfielder in the top 50. Yes it might be the worst going into a season, but if Snider becomes the player he is expected to, it may improve.

Q. I was reading recently a statistic that said only 5 per cent of young prospects who sign a contract with an MLB team actually get to the bigs. Makes we wonder about all the talk about the renewed vigour in the Jays farm system. Realistically, how many new stars are we likely to be seeing per year come out of the farm system? And of the high profile more advanced prospects like Gose, Lawrie, Hechevarria etc., what percentage of that crowd are likely to meet the high expectations that are held for them?
Thanks.
Donald Wright, Los Gatos

A. That's a very good comment and helps to explain the reason why the Jays were right to sign Jose Bautista and not even think about waiting until the trade deadline to obtain two or three prospects.

The Jays already are suddenly deep at Double and Triple-A. Why keep feeding the minor-league beast when optimistically, only about three players from each level are going to make a true impact in the majors.

However, it should be considered that baseball has 50 rounds times 30 teams, plus sandwich compensation which amounts to 1,530 players drafted per year, some 1,200 of whom sign. Looking back unscientifically, it seems about an average of four or five players per franchise ever reach the majors. That's higher than the NBA which of course has two rounds and 12 players.

The Jays farm system is certainly re-invigourated in the last two years and it's good that fanatic Jays fans seem to have as much interest as they do in the guys on the farm. The fun now is in following the many potential hopefuls throughout the year and trying to guess which players are going to make it. Just remember when the experts are rating the Top 100 it's all an educated guess.


Q. Hello Mr. Griffin. Thanks as always for you information and insight into the Jays. Would the Jays ever consider having Kyle Drabek start the season in the bullpen? Similar to Chapman did with the Reds last season? This could give him MLB experience and make the 4th and 5th starters decision easier? Thanks.
Phil McCloskey, Orangeville

A. The Jays would never consider moving Drabek to the bullpen, even though one of their many young starters is eventually going to become the closer.

Keeping him on the major-league roster as a long reliever would be counter-productive not only to Drabek but to the Jays. It always seems like long relievers enter after a starter has been ya-hammered in a game and, in that case, where's the improvement, the learning curve.

There's an uncertain pitching pattern in long relief and never seems a stressful situation that is the difference between winning and losing when you enter a game with your team far behind. In Drabek's situation or anyone that soon has a chance to be a major-league starter, the season is long and every year a major-league team needs at least a depth chart of nine starters. Better to have Drabek pitching every five days at Triple-A and catch a flight from Vegas in a moment of need than have him waiting on the sidelines in Toronto with no flow to his year.