F-Bombs
Regular readers here know that I am a tremendous fan of Feministing, which has been on my blogroll since Broadsides was launched. Founded by Jessica Valenti, it's one of my top go-to sites for the snarkiest in feminist news and views. I would link to it more often but for the fact that ''feminist'' is not the only f-word it uses and The Star, a family paper, frowns on that sort of thing.
(BTW: On Monday, I was REALLY dying to post a YouTube video of an HBO special starring the late George Carlin ranting about how pro-lifers are anti-woman, but the late, great comedian dropped so many four-letter words that it was out of the question. I did put it on my Facebook page. If you want to see it, Google is your friend.)
Anyway, the prolific, talented and eggsy Valenti is in town tonight to promote her latest book, He's a Stud, She's a Slut, and 49 Other Double Standards Every Woman Should Know, and to join in a panel discussion with ''with local feminist superheroes Jessica Yee, Sarah Wolf, and Laurel Mitchell.'' It's all sponsored by the shameless Shameless magazine and in support of the Miss G_ Project for Equity in Education, ''a grassroots young feminist organization working to combat all forms of oppression in and through education, including sexism, homophobia, racism and classism.''
For more info on the event, click here if you're on Facebook. Or go here.
Here's a snip from my column about Valenti, printed in the paper today.
He's the boss, she's a bitch. He's independent, she's pathetic. He's childless, she's selfish. He's a Romeo, she's a stalker. He's angry, she's PMSing.
These are just some of the gender inequities in Jessica Valenti's new book, He's a Stud, She's a Slut and 49 Other Double Standards Every Woman Should Know.
Pay close attention to how men and women are commonly characterized – come on down, Hillary Clinton! – and you can't miss the so-ingrained-most-can't-even-hear-them-any-more slurs against women.
"After I wrote my first book (Full Frontal Feminism), I got a lot of amazing responses," says Valenti, 29, on the phone from her home in Queens, New York, where she lives, writes and edits the popular blog she founded four years ago, feministing.com.
"I saw what resonated most with women of all ages, the everyday inequities, the everyday slights that really affected them, that made them understand why feminism is so important, that make women go `Wow, that is sexism!'"
All these gung-ho third-wave feminists gladden the heart of an old second-waver like moi.
That's because, rather than run from the f-word while benefiting from the hard-won battles for equal rights, these women embrace it.
"I call it `I'm-not-a-feminist-but' syndrome," explains Valenti. "It's like `I'm not a feminist but I think it's terrible that we don't have equal pay yet. I'm not a feminist but I think that women should have access to birth control without having problems at their pharmacies.'
"The conservative movement and the backlash against feminism have been extremely successful and smart in labelling feminism with all these ridiculous stereotypes that really serve a specific and strategic purpose. If young women believe that feminism is for man-haters, is uncool, is ugly, then why would they ever want to identify with it?"
Why indeed?
When I was Valenti's age, feminists were labelled bra-burning, hairy-legged beasts that could never catch a husband.
Some things never change.
"They have been pushing the same nonsense for so many years and we continue to fall for them," she agrees. "I tell readers they're trying to pull one over on you. They're hoping that you're going to fall for it."
Really, it's been --what? -- some 40 years since the second wave really took off in the late 60s and "they'' are still trying to keep women down.
Who are "they?'' Everybody from Republican presidential contender John McCain who has flip-flopped his position on women's reproductive rights to Canada's Conservatives who are trying to pass Bill C-484 which opens the door to our losing the right to choose here. ''They'' are the misogynist commentators who got away with sexist slurs on Hillary Clinton. ''They'' are the people who blame ''femi-nazis'' for the divorce rate, the pregnancy rate among teenagers (hello? take away access to contraception and what do you think will happen?), the crime rate and the declining birth rate. "They'' are the Church(es) who refuse to recognize what Jesus did, that women are equal to men. ''They'' are the right (religious or otherwise), the Islamists, the many patriarchal cultures, societies, religions and institutions threatened by women who are strong, independent, mobile, not chained to the bed, the nursery and the stove.
''They'' are also the corporations that rake in billions by making women feel fat, ugly and old, so that they spend their 70 cents on the male wage dollar on clothes and cosmetics they don't need so that they don't merely looked groomed or stylish, but so that they feel human.
As Valenti discussed, all those tanning parlours and nail salons sprouting up in your neighbourhood are just the latest manifestation of that.
So good on Valenti and her Feministing sisters who blog for fun but not for profit.
Long may they bitch.





I hope it's an awesome evening. Regrettably, Girl Geeks also have a dinner on tonight.
I like your use of "eggsy" :-D
And I'll have to go looking for that Carlin clip.
Posted by: ...pat. | June 25, 2008 at 06:26 PM
You know, Antonia, my fellow American (I love that sound of that) Rush Limbaugh played a clip of George Carlin ranting about the idiocy and hubris of those involved in the environmental movement. It was interesting to hear Carlin eat his own.
" ''They'' are also the corporations that rake in billions by making women feel fat, ugly and old, so that they spend their 70 cents on the male wage dollar on clothes and cosmetics they don't need so that they don't merely looked groomed or stylish, but so that they feel human."
Basically you are saying that virtually all women are stupid since they have been duped into spending their money foolishly on things they shouldn't by evil corporations. The only thing that could make them more stupid would be if it were Halliburton causing those stupid women to it. I actually disagree with you on that, but you are the expert on feminism, not me.
Oh, and I'm American. Did I mention that?
Posted by: johnnykap | June 25, 2008 at 08:33 PM
Johhnnykap, it's not your Americanism that we have issues with. It's your reductio ad absurdum. It's a bit stale.
Posted by: ...pat. | June 26, 2008 at 08:51 AM
AZ; Although I am a masculinist by birth (I would say masculist but that’s too close to masochist...), I consider myself a feminist too.
Women are caught between a rock and a hard place. Being the flower of humanity, women naturally care about attractiveness. Women get caught up by the irresistible barrage of advertising that dictates what constitutes attractiveness and end up subscribing to an unreal ideal.
We need more of the Dove type campaign that shows women can (and should) be comfortable and attractive in their own skin. I think the main ingredient of attractiveness comes from within and minimum primping of the container is all that is necessary.
Posted by: Big Dave | June 26, 2008 at 09:45 AM
I agree with you Big Dave, that we need more campaigns like Dove, but we also need more men to stand up and admit that they don't like anorexics with boob jobs and spackled on make up. Many guy friends have told me that they prefer generous (natural) curves, and find stick thin women unattractive. I've also been told "you know what I love about you? You are so natural, there are no surprises in the morning, you look the same when you go to bed as you do when you wake up, and you don't spend hours putting on makeup and doing your hair." That was from an ex who spent waaaay more time primping than I do. Anyway, the point is, men need to start being more honest about this, stop gawking at the airbrushed models, and start *publicly* voicing their preference for natural i.e. real women instead of following the pack. Men are falling for all that advertising too. While there are still guys out there who appreciate the natural look, I can tell you from daily experience that it's painful to hear negative comments from men on the street who have bought into the unrealistic ideal just as much or more than women have.
Posted by: jb | June 27, 2008 at 12:30 AM
AZ: Amen sister!
Posted by: Big Dave | June 27, 2008 at 08:03 AM