Someday my prince will come
From the always awesome Sociological Images:
Which gives me an excuse to post this little nugget from The Nation which I have been saving for just this sort of occasion. It's by Barbara Ehrenreich, one of my idols.
Disney likes to think of the Princesses as role models, but what a sorry bunch of wusses they are. Typically, they spend much of their time in captivity or a coma, waking up only when a Prince comes along and kisses them. The most striking exception is Mulan, who dresses as a boy to fight in the army, but--like the other Princess of color, Pocahontas--she lacks full Princess status and does not warrant a line of tiaras and gowns. Otherwise the Princesses have no ambitions and no marketable skills, although both Snow White and Cinderella are good at housecleaning.
And what could they aspire to, beyond landing a Prince? In Princessland, the only career ladder leads from baby-faced adolescence to a position as an evil enchantress, stepmother or witch. Snow White's wicked stepmother is consumed with envy for her stepdaughter's beauty; the sea witch Ursula covets Ariel's lovely voice; Cinderella's stepmother exploits the girl's cheap, uncomplaining, labor. No need for complicated witch-hunting techniques--pin-prickings and dunkings--in Princessland. All you have to look for is wrinkles.
<SNIP>
Seen from the witchy end of the female life cycle, the Princesses exert their pull through a dark and undeniable eroticism. They're sexy little wenches, for one thing.<SNIP>
It may be old-fashioned to say so, but sex--and especially some middle-aged man's twisted version thereof--doesn't belong in the pre-K playroom. Children are going to discover it soon enough, but they're got to do so on their own.
There's a reason, after all, why we're generally more disgusted by sexual abusers than adults who inflict mere violence on children: we sense that sexual abuse more deeply messes with a child's mind. One's sexual inclinations--straightforward or kinky, active or passive, heterosexual or homosexual--should be free to develop without adult intervention or manipulation. Hence our harshness toward the kind of sexual predators who leer at kids and offer candy. But Disney, which also owns ABC, Lifetime, ESPN, A&E and Miramax, is rewarded with $4 billion a year for marketing the masochistic Princess cult and its endlessly proliferating paraphernalia.
Let's face it, no parent can stand up against this alone. Try to ban the Princesses from your home, and you might as well turn yourself in to Child Protective Services before the little girls get on their Princess cell phones. No, the only way to topple royalty is through a mass uprising of the long-suffering serfs. Assemble with your neighbors and make a holiday bonfire out of all that plastic and tulle! March on Disney World with pitchforks held high!
Which reminds me. It's the Night of the Living Mini Disney Princesses this weekend.
PS: Coming soon: Disney's The Princess and the Frog ...
UPPITY WOMAN DATE: My Tweep @evinmaria reminds me of this wry but instructive exhibit by Vancouver artist Dina Goldstein. I have blogged about this before but it is very relevant here!





See, that's why I love the Paperbag Princess so much...
Posted by: Karen | October 26, 2009 at 09:50 PM
Disney likes giving ‘rich’ and glossy-looking makeovers to the work of other people, like the Brothers Grimm. Meanwhile, I’d bet dollars to red buttons that the Grimm Brothers would not like the way the morals they were trying to teach through their compilations of old wives' tales and whatnot seem lost in Disney’s ‘translations’ http://www.budgetblogger.com/?p=143
Posted by: Jim M | October 27, 2009 at 05:08 AM
I've been saying for years the same kind of anti-social stereotype applies to the Disney "heros". They represent the American masculine archetype: brash, beautiful, violent, morally simplistic, always right in their own eyes, entitled to circumvent societal rules if the other guy is bad, not responsible for their actions and "ends-justify-the-means" types of bullies.
I can't watch those mysogenist, "mavericky" Disney cartoons (or films), and never could...
Posted by: David Town | October 27, 2009 at 08:41 AM
And, if I think of the Disney movies I saw as a child, the only businesswoman was Cruella de Vil. What a role model.
Posted by: ...pat. | October 27, 2009 at 09:19 AM
As a corrective to Disney movies, show the kiddies the Shrek movies. Here's Snow White in Shrek 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tjBwT2MAcM
Posted by: Holly Stick | October 27, 2009 at 11:22 AM
If young and old fans of Disney can imagine the “rainbow” mentioned in the following song as the colourful but mostly useless eye-candy that Disney produces, they might want to find out what is over the rainbow:
http://listen.grooveshark.com/#/song/Somewhere_Over_the_Rainbow/9879622
Posted by: Jim M | October 27, 2009 at 12:25 PM
I'm sorry, but you were expecting progressive values from Disney?!?
Posted by: mozo | October 27, 2009 at 03:13 PM
Amusing! But have you considered the burden those Charming Princes bear: risking life and limb on some idiotic quest merely to prove yourself worthy to some wuss of a woman!
Posted by: William Hayes | October 28, 2009 at 04:02 PM