Wheels.ca

« Would you pay $10,000 for a Tata Nano? | Main | The Crank is in Detroit »

January 08, 2010

Bailout Blues: Do GM and Chrysler need to offer Hyundai-like warranties?

D3_mrktshre Hyundai_mrktshr Our friends over at The Truth About Cars have started using data from analysts at Morgan & Company. One of their first comparisons: long-term U.S. market share between the automakers formerly-known-as The Big/Detroit Three.

As you can see in the first graph, above left, it's been a long, downhill slide for Chrysler, Ford and General Motors since the early 90s.The exception is Ford, which is on a relative rebound.

Today over at TTAC, they decided to look at upstart Hyundai's numbers since 1993, above right. No surprise that the Korean automaker has seen unbridled rise in market share

What is interesting is TTAC's reasoning for Hyundai's success.

Since 1998, the automaker has offered its 10 year/100,000 mile U.S. bumper-to-bumper warranty (5 year/100,000 km in Canada)—a sure sign that it believed in its products more than some its less-than-reliable and durable offerings from the early 1990s (Excel? Hello?)

Currently GM and Chrysler in Canada offer a common 3 year/60,000 km comprehensive, and an additional 5 year/160,000 and 100,000 km, respectively,  drivetrain-only warranty.

So, TTAC asks, Do GM and Chrysler need to offer longer, more comprehensive warranties to gain back consumer confidence?

Would you consider a Chevy Malibu or Dodge Avenger over a Hyundai Sonata if they came with better warranties?

[Source: The Truth About Cars]

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf8f353ef012876b85df7970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bailout Blues: Do GM and Chrysler need to offer Hyundai-like warranties?:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

It might move them up the list of vehicles I would consider, but only if the "Detroit 3" actually provide the warranty coverage. My experience with them is that their dealers will try to wriggle out of warranty repairs for the slightest reason. I contrast that with my experience with Kia, where every warranty claim I had over the period of coverage was promptly and cheerfully addressed and corrected. Of course the fact that I had only 3 items to worry about during my 5 years/100,000 km coverage certainly helped.

Warranty coverage is important; it does signal a level of pride and confidence in the product by the manufacturer. What is even better is never having to use that warranty coverage in the first place!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

John LeBlanc's Crank


  • Wheels writer John LeBlanc was the owner of an advertising and marketing firm before indulging his lifelong passion for cars by becoming an automotive journalist. Join in the discussion as he provides expert critical analysis of the foibles of the auto industry.

Wheels Advertising