Wheels.ca

« The Crank: Live at the 2010 CIAS | Main | Does Ford really need Lincoln to succeed? »

February 17, 2010

Bailout Blues: Will Fiat ever deliver on its promise of new Chryslers?

Dodge_B_Car_sketch With U.S. lawmakers taking Toyota to the wood shed this week, let’s take a look at another automaker with some, ahem, challenges: Fiat-run Chrysler.

It’s been a quiet few months for the U.S. automaker. Virtually taking the year off with no new models for 2010, Chrysler has had little or no presence on the auto show circuit. In fact, the new product tap has been virtually tuned off since the 2009 Journey, Challenger and Ram.

But last week, a puff of white smoke emanated from the Detroit automaker. Ralph Gilles, president and CEO of Dodge Car and senior vice president of Chrysler’s Product Design, presented a sketchy-looking teaser shot of a future, Fiat Punto-based Dodge subcompact hatch, above, during a Chicago auto show luncheon.

Trouble is, according to Fiat’s published product plans, the new Dodge subcompact isn’t due until 2013, giving fresh competition like the Ford Fiesta, Chevrolet Aveo, VW Polo and Mazda2 (plus the established Yaris/Fit/Accent/Versa clan) a couple of years head start in the marketplace.

Today, Chrysler has zero presence in the subcompact class. And although the Fiat 500 city car has been promised to be on sale in Canada by the end of this year, it’s a low-volume niche vehicle at best.

So what until 2013?

Fiat boss,, Sergio “The Don” Marchionne, has promised to “fix” the current bottom-feeder Chryslers, like the Dodge Caliber, Avenger and Chrysler Sebring, for the 2012 model year, and new versions of its big sedans and SUVs are on the way:

 “The first half of 2010 is going to be more difficult than the second, simply because the product offering doesn’t start delivering until the second half. The first real viable, tangible evidence of this is going to be the Grand Cherokee in [quarter two], which is brand new. Then we’re going to see the Wrangler coming out with a significant update. I think there are 14 other interventions, most of which are significant enough to warrant almost a new product launch – that will come out in [quarter three] or [quarter four] this year.”

For 2010, The Don has said Chrysler must sell 1.65 million vehicles worldwide to put the automaker in a "slightly positive" profit position, profit needed to re-pay government loans as he has promised.

That would mean about 1.1 million sales in the U.S. Trouble is, U.S. sales for January were down another 8 per cent compared with the same period last year; or about 685,000 annually. Not good.

Let’s face it: Sketches are cheap compared to real, new product development. So until Fiat does something tangible—like a competitive family sedan and crossover platform—its hard to fathom just what Fiat’s intentions are with the Chrysler and Dodge brands.

But with sales tracking at about half what is needed to stay alive, the numbers just don’t add up in The Don’s favour.

Do you think Chrysler can stay in business long enough to see these teaser shots become reality?

[Sources: Autobirdblog, The Chicago Sun Times, Edmund’s Auto Observer]

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf8f353ef012877ae99e1970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bailout Blues: Will Fiat ever deliver on its promise of new Chryslers? :

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Chrysler looks to be dead in the water with sharks circling around it.
They've got nothing in the product pipeline. Why not at least bring over some Alfa Romeo's to generate some buzz until the other new products arrive? Chrysler got too addicted to the SUV drug and its paying a heavy price.

Anyways, looks to me like Chrysler will continue to lose money until they get new (and better) product. Their recent efforts have been pretty disappointing. Like the Caliber, Sebring and Avenger they are all completely uncompetitive. The interiors are a disgrace and the engines are mediocre.

I liked that concept they had a few years back, the Hornet. That was a good idea and one wonders why they didn't rush it into production. If it had a half-decent interior and a reasonable price they'd sell plenty of them.

Cerberus seemed to make some pretty stupid decisions too, canceling the Pacifica and Magnum wagons, when they would probably sell a lot more now if they were still available.

The Sebring and Avenger are supposedly going to be massively overhauled (including Fiat stuff under the hood) by the end of the year.

Plus there's a chance Chrysler could try to bring some kind of Lancia over pretty soon.

Not a chance. They never should have been bailed out in the first place. Find buyers for the Jeep brand and the Dodge trucks and eliminate the cars. They're quite simply not going to make it.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

John LeBlanc's Crank


  • Wheels writer John LeBlanc was the owner of an advertising and marketing firm before indulging his lifelong passion for cars by becoming an automotive journalist. Join in the discussion as he provides expert critical analysis of the foibles of the auto industry.

Wheels Advertising