Food safety, free trade and the election

If ever voters have power, it's now - and that includes putting your candidates under the microscope on food safety issues. Common Frontiers sends along a link to a useful site (Food Safety First) for voters that offers insight from various media reports on the timing of cuts to safety inspection programs and the outbreak of listeriosis. In my view, the finest work has been done by Toronto Star investigative reporter Robert Cribb, working in conjunction with his colleagues at the CBC.

What does food safety have to do with free trade? A great deal, argues Common Frontiers, a Canadian group critical of the trend towards economic integration - harmonization, as it's politely put - of standards under the North American Free Trade Agreement. Rick Arnold, the group's executive director, says deregulation in the food industry in Canada has its genesis with the folks at the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), an ongoing program among Canada, the U.S. and Mexico to harmonize across-the-board. In other words, standards in Canada are lowered to match those south of both borders. Says Arnold:

"Part of the SPP agenda involves developing common North American standards on how food is produced, how it is inspected, how it is processed and how it is moved from one place to another. Common food safety standards developed in the public interest might be a good idea. But the SPP is not about raising food standards. It is about removing 'trade irritants' and deregulating the food industries."

Arnold criticizes the secrecy surround SPP decisions. An exception, he says, was the 2006 SPP report that identified stricter pesticide residue limits in Canada as a "barrier to trade," a finding resulting in the relaxation of Canadian standards. Large corporations appear to have privileged access to the SPP process under the umbrella of the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC). Arnold asks Canadians to check out the food safety site and, if they have questions, take them to candidates in their ridings to find out where they stand. Now is the best time to expect answers.

Comments

[Arby]

This blog entry info is very important. I haven't been able to get at the hard copy Star recently, so I don't know if there's anything like it in the paper. Doesn't look like it.

North American political integration continues to be on the menu as far as the capitalist class and our elites are concerned. The harmonization of standards downward equals cost cutting, a way for capitalists to make money and for politicians to abet them in their proiteering. The only investments they want to make are those that benefit them personally and directly. Business, not betterment of civil society, is the business they're in.

I think it was William Greider who noted that to the extent that America made it to the top of the heap economically, that could be attributable to cost cutting. Of course, That didn't mean that 'all' of American has succeeded. And America's prosperity has been undermined by it's super efficient, rightwing leadership in politics and business.

Somewhere I saw a picture of a protester holding a sign that said "I am a trade barrier." And that, when all is said and done, is how free trading capitalists view regular people. If we can be persuaded and/or cajoled and/or tricked, via consumerism, propaganda and a brutal work culture, into shutting up, then we have been sidelined and will be no barrier to whatever plans they devise, without our input or approval, even if those plans hurt us, which they will since capitalism is about exploitation. And I find that as irritating as capitalists find the trade barrier that I represent irritating.

- Arby (using my mother's Star account)