Connect with Facebook | Login/Register
 
collapse Site map

07/25/2011

Magic doesn't transfer, and other thoughts on Judah-Khan

Heading into Saturday night's title unification bout between Amir "King" Khan and Zab "Super" Judah, there was about as much doubt about the eventual outcome as there is about which pitch Mariano Rivera is throwing next.

Which is to say there was none.

Rivera is throwing the cutter, and the only question is whether or not you'll hit it.

And Khan was going to win that fight, with the only real questions revolving around whether or not the fight would last all 12 rounds. After all, bouts between 24-year-old rising superstars and 33-year-olds with a history of high-profile losses tend to unfold a certain way.

Turns out the fight was a whitewash for Khan, who dominated four rounds before felling Judah in the fifth with a body shot that Judah -- in a desperate effort to save face -- claimed was a low blow.

A disappointing ending? Of course it was. Most of us  expected a better effort from Judah, even if we didn't expect him to win. 

But as anticlimactic as the ending was, the bout wasn't a complete waste of time. In fact, if offered plenty to observe and to learn. 

For example.

1. Khan's stock is set to skyrocket

The 2004 olympian from England has made light years of progress since his one-round blowout defeat against Breidis Prescott in 2008, and each big win at junior welterweight puts that lopsided loss further behind him.

Where Khan goes from here, but his promoters (Golden Boy Productions) and trainer (Freddie Roach) give him a double-barrelled blast of positive publicity and instant entree into the Pacquiao/Mayweather sweepstakes, both potential bouts shot through with seductive subplots.

If he meets Mayweather he's seeking revenge for both De La Hoya and Roach, who trained the Golden Boy for the May 2007 bout he eventually lost to Mayweather.

And if, as Golden Boy's Richard Schaefer has been suggesting, they're trying to maneuver him into a Pacquiao bout, Khan will have to choose a new trainer since he and Pacquiao, who spar together regularly, currently share Roach.

Divided loyalties. Teacher versus student. Too tempting to pass up.

 

2. Zab Judah is Who We Thought He Was

I can't be the only guy who watched Judah quit on Saturday night and had a flashback to this classic rant from Dennis Green.

Remember when Kostya Tsyzu knocked Judah into oblivion during their November 2001 title bout? When Zab regained his senses he blamed referee Jay Nady, which is perfectly logical given that it's clearly Nady's fault that Judah couldn't block the straight right hands Tsyzu bashed him with.

 

And remember when Floyd Mayweather snatched the momentum from Judah in their April 2006 matchup, battering the pride of Brooklyn's body and breaking him down by degrees? Instead of responding with a tactical shift that might have swung the fight back into his favour Judah chose to punch Mayweather in the nuts.

 

(Note...watch the guy in the white and red who dives into the fray about 24 seconds in. That man knows how to brawl.)

Saturday night we got both.

When Judah sensed he couldn't win he searched for a way out, and when Khan banged him on the belt Judah took the exit ramp. He writhed on the floor while referee Vick Draculich counted, as if incapacitated by the blow, yet found the strength to leap to his feet and protest when the count reached 10.

The explanation he offered to HB0 cameras afterward -- that he thought the ref was issuing a standing eight count so he could get himself together and continue fighting -- is irrational and at odds with both the rules and the spirit of the sport.

But here's what makes sense: Judah knew he was losing, so he quit. And when he didn't want to admit losing he blamed the ref, just like he has in the past. He is who we thought he was.

 

3. Magic doesn't transfer

I know a lot of Judah supporters hoped it would. After all his new trainer, Hall of Famer Pernell Whitaker, was, like Judah, a fast southpaw who could attack from all angles. And at 33 he confronted a similar challenge, coming off a poor performance and taking on the then-24-year-old De La Hoya in a welterweight title bout.

And he took De La Hoya to school. Dropped him, cut him, made him miss and made him pay in losing a 12-round decision that many observers (this one included) feel he won.

With his guidance Judah could produce a similarly strong performance under difficult circumstances...in theory.

But the reality is that Judah is who we thought he was, and Whitaker's presence in training camp can't turn him into the second coming of Sweet Pea. 

For Whitaker defense has always been an art. For Judah it's always been an afterthought. 

Whitaker couldn't have transfered his defensive mastery to Judah in the a training camp, a decade or a lifetime. At 33, a fighter can make subtle adjustments, but expecting him to defend like Whitaker is like asking John McDonald spend an off-season with Jose Bautista then return to the Jays as a 50-homer hitter.

It's not going to happen. You can't become a virtuoso by osmosis.

4. Not a signature win for Khan, but valuable nonetheless

If Khan is the fighter people think he can become, this win over Judah won't define his career any more than his win over Paul McCloskey will, so we can't use it as an opportunity to anoint him the pound-for-pound king in waiting. 

But he did lay a thorough beating on a big-name opponent -- which is what he has to do if he's the fighter people think he can become. So even if the win isn't a sign that Khan is one of the top three fighters in the world, it definitely signals that he's ready for whatever challenge Golden Boy and Roach seek out for him next.

Let's just hope Timothy Bradley gets it together....

5. As for Judah....

His legacy depends on who's telling the story.

At best he's an all-time very good who just couldn't turn the corner against the fight game's true elite.

At worst he's a crybaby, a product of the New York hype machine who dominated scrubs but crumbled against true champions.

Either way, he'll never headline another big card or earn another seven-figure purse. So I'm hoping somebody close to him is advising him to retire.

He'll always get fights because he still has a big name, but as DeMarcus Corley or Gary Goodridge can tell you, life as a resume-filler for young contenders is hazardous to your health.

Retiring might hurt, but more losses like one Judah suffered Saturday night hurt worse.

 

Follow the Morgan Campbell on Twitter and Google Plus

07/12/2011

Sugar Ray on Pacquiao, Money May: "I'd knock 'em both out."

 

Of course, he was kidding when he said that...sort of.

 

Sugar Ray Leonard may be one of the best to ever lace on gloves, an Olympic gold medalist and six-division world champ who blended technique, tactics and tenacity like few others, but he has one thing in common with the rest of us.

He's a boxing fan.

His insights into a hypothetical superfight between Manny Pacquiao and Floyd Mayweather may carry more weight than mine or yours, but like me and you he'd rather see the fight than speculate about it.

But that didn't stop us from asking him a few questions about the fight we all want to see but might never witness.

Tuesday afternoon we caught up with Leonard to discuss his new autobiography, and after talking books he agreed to go twelve rounds with your favourite sportswriter, tackling topics from his favourite place to fight, to whether he deserved a draw in his rematch with Thomas Hearns, to how Mayweather and Pacquiao would fare against him in his prime.

Fun stuff as always, and props to Sugar Ray for his honesty. 

To listen to an interview that goes way more than twelve rounds, click the link below.

FightingWordsSRL_July12_2k11_1



 

 

06/08/2011

May Weather in June and September

A few weeks back, sick of being teased by sunny days bracketed by entire weeks of rain I posted the following plea to my twitter feed:

"Waiting for the return of May weather. The climate or the fighter. I'm not picky."

For everybody who re-tweeted in agreement, it looks like we're getting both.

Tuesday afternoon Mayweather announced via his own Twitter account that on Sept. 17 he would challenge Victor Ortiz for the WBC welterweight belt.

Mayweather-Mosley-Box_NEWS4Granted, the May weather didn't arrive until June and Mayweather still hasn't signed up to fight Pacquiao, but I'm not complaining.

And neither should you.

Any time the biggest name in the fight game steps into the ring it's good for the Sweet Science and for sports overall.

Of course, when Mayweather first tweeted about the Ortiz fight he prompted a backlash both immediate and predictable.

"Your fans aren't waiting for this fight."

"Why aren't you fighting Manny?"

"Floyd knows he can't beat Pacquiao."

Understandable given the Pacquiao-Mayweather dance that has droned on for nearly two years.

But that doesn't make any of the anti-Mayweather reaction logical.

The people bashing Mayweather for his choice in opponents need to remember that Pacquiao was never an option for a September bout, not with the reigning pound-for-pound king already signed to fight Juan Manuel Marquez in November.

Demanding Mayweather face Pacquiao next means asking Pacquiao to compromise his November showdown with Marquez, or asking that Mayweather remain on the sidelines until spring 2012 and face the world's top  fighter after a two-year layoff.

Neither scenario makes sense and if you're honest with yourself you'll recognize that, no matter how much you might dislike Mayweather.

And whether you like or abhor him you realize Mayweather boxing is infinitely more appealing than Mayweather not boxing.

Mayweather not boxing gets into petty skirmishes that land him in legal trouble, or whiles away copious free time by shooting corny videos with washed-up rap stars.

But Mayweather boxing is the biggest draw in the sport.

The people ripping Mayweather for choosing Ortiz might disagree with that point, but they also prove it.

To argue that Mayweather should fight Pacquiao this fall mean you're not fully aware of Pacquiao's schedule but you're fully aware of Mayweather's because you're criticizing it. So even if Mayweather doesn't engender more love than Pacquiao does among sports fans, he still garners more attention -- when he decides to fight.

And understand the September showdown with Ortiz is a legitimate fight.

Is Ortiz supposed to beat Mayweather, or even raise a few lumps on the face so pretty it lent Mayweather his first nickname? 

Of course not.

But he is a world champion who answered nagging questions about his heart by rising from the canvas to vanquish the previously undefeated Andre Berto in April, and who in signing on for the biggest payday of his career figures to enter the ring hungry to knock off a future Hall-of-Famer.

 

And the fact that he functions as a high-level tuneup bout for Mayweather says more about Mayweather's skill level and profile than about his alleged lack of courage.

This doesn't necessarily mean Mayweather wins in a walkover, but he and his team are banking that the gap in skills between him and the rest of the welterweight division remains too wide for even the WBC champ to close.

And it means that Mayweather, whom I had considered semi-retired until Tuesday, is once again an active fighter, which in turn means a spring 2012 mega-match with Pacquiao is possible.

It'll come two years too late, but if it happens will you complain?

I didn't think so.

 

 

05/19/2011

Hopkins wins mental game ahead of title fight with Pascal

If you can afford the pay-per-view or can find a sports bar showing the fight you just might see a world record Saturday night, when 46-year-old Bernard Hopkins challenges Montreal's Jean Pascal for the WBC world light-heavyweight title. 

A win would make Hopkins the oldest man ever to win a world boxing title, outpacing even George Foreman, who was 45 when he knocked out Michael Moorer to win the heavyweight title in 1994.

If the world record attempt eluded your attention, you're forgiven.

PascalhopkinsBetween Jose Bautista's unprecedented hot streak, Jorge Posada's drama in New York and heated playoff series in both the NHL and NBA, it's easy for sports fan to overlook a title fight -- even a historically significant one.

Heck, Saturday's fight -- rematch of a December draw most observers felt Pascal lost -- isn't even the chief reason Hopkins has been making headlines lately.

Early last week Hopkins played Muhammad Ali to Donovan McNabb's Joe Frazier, calling the former Eagles' quarterback's manhood and blackness into question.

If you haven't noticed, black-on-black race baiting is making headlines these days, turning everyone from Grant Hill/Jalen Rose to Jon Jones/Rashad Evans into into talk show, blog and twitter fodder.

The existence of intra-racial tension in the African-American community shouldn't surprise anyone. After all, does it shock you to learn that all white people don't agree on all issues?

Exactly.

The surprise here is the intense interest with which mainstream media -- and its audience -- now follow esoteric issues of African-American identity. I have a theory but exploring it too deeply would take this blog entry into area that would get my knuckles rapped by the people who pay me.

But I'll tell you this: Hopkins' anti-McNabb rant gained traction because it appealed to all kinds of  latent yet widely embraced "isms":

Race. Voyeur. Fetish.

But again, this blog is about the fight game and this entry concerns the upcoming bout between Hopkins and Pascal. And like the bitter verbal fights that have popped into the headlines since March, this bout also revolves around an ism.

Skeptic.

As in, Hopkins is 46 and people don't believe a fighter that old can perform at that high a level without using steroids.

And by people I mean Pascal, who since the rematch was signed has engaged in a one-man crusade to force Hopkins to drug testing more stringent than the Quebec Athletic Commission requires.

In a way, it makes sense. People feel burned by a long line of athletes who shattered records only to be revealed later as performance enhancing drug users. 

Fans, journalists and competitors are wary and it's tough to blame them.

Each home run for Bautista draws a few more sideways glances, thanks to basbeall's steroid-era sluggers.

Every blazing 100-meter dash time laid down by Carmelita Jeter echoes the steroid-fuelled success of Marion Jones.

And as Manny Pacquiao racks up wins, questions mount from Floyd Mayweather's camp about whether he's cheating to achieve them.

But Pascal is different.

Before their first fight Pascal didn't voice a single suspicion about Hopkins and steroids. But the older man batters him for the latter half of their bout last December and suddenly he's Tony Mandarich.

 

Strange.

Pascal hope his steroid accusations would raise suspicions about Hopkins among boxing fans, but instead they only confirm that the Executioner is in his head.

Already.

Again.

If Pascal weren't so distracted he'd realize that an elite fighter at 28 should beat the world's best 46-year-old, steroids or not. Fact is, Pascal struggles whenever an opponent stalks him and fires first, and laboured mightily in December because he couldn't figure out how to avoid Hopkins' soul-sapping left hooks to the body. 

Those are problems you solve through coaching, game planning and execution, not a drug test. 

Chad Dawson exposed Pascal's flaws in the final rounds of their fight last August, and if Hopkins didn't exploit them in December, Dawson would have in the rematch.

Yet Pascal continues to rant about drug testing, Hopkins' fighting style and Antonio Tarver's scorecard.

 

In pre-fight interviews Pascal continues to portray confidence, and offers a litany of accomplishments to an ESPN reporter as evidence that he's a the superior boxer.

Hopkins, meanwhile, stated the more compelling case in the ring in December, beating Pascal into retreat mode over that fight's final rounds.

Does that performance guarantee a win on Saturday?

Not at all.

Hopkins has defied age for more than a decade, but at a certain point 46 is 46. 

But betting against him isn't easy. He doesn't take a fight unless he's sure he can win, and December's fight gave him a close-up view of glaring flaws that Pascal may not have corrected since then.

There's a chance Pascal has used this training camp for a Rocky III-style reprogramming, but there's an equal chance that the glitches in his style are deeply too deeply ingrained to change in six months.

And if Hopkins can still pull the trigger quickly enough to exploit them we might see a new world record Saturday night.

 

 

 

 

05/17/2011

The Super Six and the Search for Boxing's Next Star

Andre Ward's 12-round decision over Arthur Abraham Saturday night, summarized in one word.

Impressive.

The lopsided result, which propelled the undefeated Ward into the final of Showtime's Super Six 168-pound tournament, shouldn't surprise anybody beyond Abraham's immediate family.

When opponents stand right in front of Abraham and bang away at his gloves -- like Edison Miranda and Jermain Taylor did -- he looks impressive countering with hard, accurate shots.

But Abraham adjusts to shifting tactics worse than Manny Ramirez adjusted to shifting outfield winds. Andre Dirrell exposed Abraham in March 2010, working angles and potshotting so relentlessly that in the 11th round a frustrated Abraham got himself disqualified, slugging a downed Dirrell after the American slipped to the canvas.

And last November Carl Froch further outsmarted and outclassed Abraham over 12 of the most one-sided rounds you're likely to see at boxing's elite level.

Against that backdrop Ward couldn't afford to struggle. For fighter working to enter the pound-for-pound title picture, a shootout against an opponent two of his peers had dominated wasn't an option.

And Ward didn't let it happen.

After two competitive rounds Ward pressed the action in the third and established the pattern the rest of the fight would follow: Ward snapping jabs and uppercuts through Abraham's guard, ripping shots to the body and looping hooks to the head a confused Abraham staggered forward winging wild shots.

 

The victory earns Ward a spot in the Super Six final, but his future beyond the ring isn't so clear.

Ward's diverse skills have him surging upward on boxing's pound-for-pound list, and under the old formula for creating boxing superstars -- Olympic Gold plus an unblemished face and record -- he would already be NBA player-famous. 

But that system of producing boxing celebrities disappeared with Oscar De La Hoya, so despite Ward's impeccable pedigree we can't be sure that he's the transcendent superstar who will sustain the sport in the future.

Which might seem like yet another troubling sign for a sport many experts believe is on a steep, one-way decline, but i'm not sure it matters much.

There's no disputing that boxing depends heavily on a few huge stars to earn what little attention the sport still receives from mainstream fans and media. And there's no denying that the sport's current crop of superstars sorely needs a boost.

De La Hoya is a full-time promoter now and Bernard Hopkins is 46. Floyd Mayweather is 34 and semi-retired, and while Manny Pacquiao is still producing he, too, is creeping deeper into his 30s. Besides, without Mayweather as a partner, just about every potential matchup for the Pac Man seems like an anticlimax.

Since the Super Six tournament kicked off October 2009 Ward has emerged as one of several exciting fighters grabbing attention among hardcore boxing followers. The group includes Cuban exile and featherweight champ Yuriorkis Gamboa and cyclist-turned-154-pound champ Sergio Martinez, but it doesn't include a sure-fire successor to Pacquaio and Mayweather as a boxing champ with mainstream cachet.

That's problematic for sure, but I'm not convinced its a sign that, as Frank DeFord argues, we'll never see another great boxer.

It's a tempting conclusion to leap to.

A generation ago we could see boxing stars coming. They were Americans who either won medals at the Olympics (think Holyfield, Whitaker et al) or smashed their way through through the heavyweight division with spectacular knockouts (think Mike Tyson).

But it's been a genereation since the pro debut of De La Hoya,a 1992 Olympic champ the last boxer to graduate from the 20th-century system of making stars.

 Yes, Mayweather won bronze in Atlanta, but he didn't exactly step into stardom. Boxing fans knew him a mind-blowing skill set and massive ego, but was a minor player in the sports world at large until HBO's 24/7 reality series exposed him to the mainstream.

Now he's (arguably), the second-biggest name in the boxing game, (arguably) eclipsed only by another star nobody saw coming.

*Although at this point the only one arguing against Pacquiao's primacy is Mayweather himself.*

Three years ago Manny Pacquiao could have walked unnoticed down just about any street in North America -- even if he was wearing the WBC super featherweight belt he owned back then. Now his image graces billboards on both sides of the Pacific, evidence of a rocket ride to mainstream fame in North America that as unexpected as it was sudden. 

And that's the point.

In this age of fragmented title belts and audiences it's increasingly difficult to manufacture a superstar, much less predict who will become one. 

Yet superstars still develop.

So yes, the search for a boxing saviour looks grim at the moment. Ward is an outstanding fighter but lacks Mayweather's flash or Pacquiao's combination of power and personality.

But in the months leading up to De La Hoya/Mayweather the outlook was equally gloomy.

Then from that fight a superstar emerged. Mayweather, B-side of what was supposed to be the last significant fight in history.

A year and a half later another star popped up. Pacquiao a small but powerful filipino with spotty English and a jones for karaoke.

So while we search for a star to replace those two we need to remember that he is probably already out there.

We just don't know who he is yet.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

05/12/2011

Brock Lesnar's toughest opponent

Seventeen months after announcing his triumphant comeback from a severe case of diverticulosis, UFC heavyweight Brock Lesnar has again been sidelined by the intestinal infection.

Thursday afternoon the UFC used a quickly convened conference call to announce that this latest flareup of the disease will keep Lesnar out of the octagon indefinitely, forcing him out of a scheduled June 11 showdown in Vancouver with fellow contender Junior Dos Santos.

The winner of that bout was to have faced Cain Velasquez, who knocked Lesnar out to claim the UFC heavyweight crown last October. And while Lesnar's disappointed at the missed opportunity he says the return of the intestinal disorder has forced him to prioritize.

"I'm choked up about it (but)there's nothing I can do," said Lesnar, a former WWE star who joined the UFC in 2008. "There isn't a fight in the world that's more important than my health."

Brock-lesnar

In November 2009 a severe case of diverticulosis felled Lesnar while on a hunting trip in Manitoba, leading to an experience with the Canadian health care system that left the then-heavyweight champion less than impressed

A month later UFC president Dana White still wasn't sure if the disease would allow Lesnar to compete again, but the turn of the year 2010 also brought a turn in Lesnar's health. By the end of January he announced that medication plus a new, healthier diet had chased the disease into remission, and June he had vanquished interim champ Shane Carwin to reclaim the UFC's heavyweight belt.

The path back to that title was supposed to go through Dos Santos, a hard-hitting Brazilian who hasn't lost since 2007. Earlier this year the UFC chose the two men to coach opposing teams of aspiring fighters on the SpikeTV reality show The Ultimate Fighter, with all sub-plots leading to their clash at UFC 131 in Vancouver.

But three weeks ago Lesnar felt a familiar pain in his abdomen.

The sheer stress of three-a-day workouts had allowed the infection, which never fully leaves a patient's system, to regain a foothold. Lesnar responded by scaling back his training while taking antibiotics, but after three weeks of cutting corners he realized he'd never be able to prepare properly while still fighting the infection.

Lesnar-vs-mir-ufc

"It didn't allow me to train to my full capabilities," says Lesnar, who won the UFC title in just his third pro bout. "It just drains my whole body down" 

When Lesnar decided to pull out of the fight the UFC summoned Carwin to replace him against Dos Santos.

But the next steps for the fighter aren't so clear.

He's considering surgery, but hasn't yet established a timeline to decide whether to undergo it. In the meantime he'll consult with doctors at the Mayo clinic over the best way to subdue the stubborn infection.

"There's a solution to every problem," he says. "I've just got to find the right solution to this problem"

But despite the uncertainty over surgery, Lesnar is sure he will return to the Octagon eventually.

"I'm looking for the light at the end of the tunnel here," he said. "I'm sick and tired of being sick and tired. We've got to find a solution to this."

 

 

05/04/2011

GSP is rich; Dana White is wealthy

PARENTAL ADVISORY...EXPLICIT LANGUAGE ON THE CHRIS ROCK CLIP

Fighter payouts from UFC 129 are now public, and it doesn't take a Bill James-style statistical guru to figure out for all the physical and mental strain that go with preparing for these bouts, the payoff is paltry.

Naturally Georges St-Pierre tops the pay scale, banking $400,000 for his decision win over Jake Shields, while Lyoto Machida grossed $329,000 for his flying front kick knockout of Randy Couture, who himself earned $250,000.

Those three men consumed more than 53 percent of the UFC's total payroll, with less than $1 million spread between 21 other fighters.

St-Pierre might be the closest thing the UFC has to Manny Pacquiao -- a dominant fighter inside the ring and an endearing character outside of it, someone whose fame crosses borders and who demonstrates that the American sports mainstream can indeed embrace foreign stars. 

Gspshields

But at the bank, Rush can't touch the Pac Man.

St-Pierre's $200,000 guarantee is roughly one percent of what Pacqiao is promised for his showdown this Saturday with Shane Mosely, and UFC 129's entire payroll ($1.84 million) translates into about a round of work for boxing's pound-for-pound champ.

That's not an accident.

It's how the UFC is built -- top down, president Dana White as the face of the organization while the fighters are interchangeable pieces, even when they're famous. Some -- like St-Pierre and Anderson Silva -- gain fame, but none gains true independence.

Which is smart business, because it significantly limits the UFC's financial exposure and, most importantly, competition.

Guarantee headliners sums that rival Vernon Wells' salary and you risk losing money if for some reason the pay-per-view doesn't sell. A guarantee is a guarantee, after all.

Beyond that, if the UFC starts paying its stars Pacquiao money it risks blurring the boundary between the wealthy and the merely rich. It's important distinction, pointed out brilliantly by comedian Chris Rock, because when that border shifts so does the balance of power.

St-Pierre's not poor.

His $400,000 paycheques are bigger than he would earn fighting for any other promoter. He won't make that kind of cash fighting on the Score, and he wouldn't bank like that with Strikeforce, the former competitor the UFC bought earlier this year. 

But while his purses are big enough to keep St-Pierre at home they're still small enough to keep him from getting ideas.

Oscarsmile

You guys ever wonder why Oscar De La Hoya is always smiling?

It's because 10 years ago he figured out that the best way to make big, sustainable, money in boxing is to get paid when other people fight. So in 2001 he founded Golden Boy Promotions.

Because the boxers can get rich, but promoters are wealthy.

And you know how he made the leap between the two?

By being the sport's cash cow for a decade and a half, stacking eight-figure paydays until he could afford to go into business for himself. Before Pacquiao and Floyd Mayweather surpassed him no boxer cashed bigger cheques than the Golden Boy, who had earned more than $150 million in the ring even before grossing $43 million more against Mayweather in 2007. 

By then, of course, he was six years into his career as fighter-promoter, the dual role ensuring that no matter the outcome the Golden Boy would always win at the bank. And after years of depending on people like Bob Arum and Don King, De La Hoya competes with them.

For fighters.

For clout.

For the pay-per-view airtime that sustains the sport.

Like De La Hoya decade ago, St-Pierre is the biggest name in his sport, and a recognizeable face that makes him not just a fighter but a business unto himself.

Which isn't to say that St-Pierre shares De La Hoya's long term ambition. He might not want to trade the stress of being a fighter for the headaches of employing a roster of them. Not now, not ever.

But this isn't about St-Pierre. Its about the top-down structure of the UFC that allows fighters like him to earn very good money, but never enough to acquire clout.

Not at $400,000 per win.

So even if he wanted to graduate from competing in the UFC to competing against them, the chances of him making it happen are slimmer than St-Pierre himself the morning of the weigh in.

Which is to say it won't happen.

And the UFC doesn't mind that at all.

 

Follow the Star's Morgan Campbell on twitter.

04/12/2011

Hurry up and wait for UFC-Strikeforce crossover clashes

If you're looking for evidence of the UFC-ization of Strikeforce, head to YouTube.

Before the UFC took over the second-biggest promotional outfit in mixed martial arts, you knew that if you missed a Strikeforce card on a given Saturday night you could head to the world's largest video sharing website to see fairly high-quality replays of the night's biggest fights.

Not anymore.

If you logged post-fight looking for a video of Strikeforce welterweight champ Nick Diaz' dramatic knockout win over Paul Daley, Youtube wasn't going to give you much beyond a few archived previews and a grainy, filmed-off-of-TV replay of the fight's finish.

But if you have SuperChannel or were at the right sports bar you saw the expert grappler Diaz defeat the dangerous Daley on the striker's terms, surviving a knockdown and several other tense moments to pummell an exhausted Daley in the closing seconds of the first round.

DiazdaleyThe win was Diaz' 10th in a row and it solidified both his grip on Strikeforce's 170-title and his claim as one of the world's very best welterweights, regardless of what organization owns his contract. And since stopping Daley, Diaz has become the subject of speculation that he's the fighter most suited for a superfight with Georges St-Pierre (provided, of course, GSP handles Jake Shields in Toronto April 30).

Couple of big obstacles to that fight, though.

The first is skill.

Yes, Diaz is by far the most impressive welterweight on StrikeForce's roster, especially since Shields jumped to the UFC. And yes, a 10-fight unbeaten streak is difficult to string together in MMA, no matter your level of competition.

But we don't know how Diaz, who last fought in the UFC in 2006, is more qualified to take on St. Pierre than the UFC's current crop of welterweights. It's tough to picture him reeling off 10 straight wins when facing guys like Thiago Alves, Jon Fitch and Josh Koscheck, and tougher to picture him faring any better than those three did against GSP.

Secondly, and most importantly, there's red tape.

Earlier this winter UFC bought Strikeforce, whose president, Scott Coker, says with enthusiasm that interpromotional showdowns aren't just appealing but inevitable. But UFC boss Dana White still hasn't budged from his initial intention to run the two outfits as separate companies.

Which means MMA fans can brace for the same dilemma that has bedeviled boxing fans for a generation:

Disputed champs.

Multiple beltholders in the same weight class tantalyzingly close to squareing off to determine who really rules, but who in the end never do because promoters and sactioning bodies can't get on the same page.

Fans who need to satisfy themselves with debating dream matchups instead of seeing them.

That scenario's only fun to in that if you make a prediction on a fight that is never going to happen, you can never be proven wrong (Mayweather KO's Pacquiao in three!!!). And the idea of keeping Strikeforce stars out of the cage with UFC champs seems to contradict the strategy that helped the UFC rise to the top of the fight game in the first place. Because the UFC holds the contracts of just about every MMA fighter we care about, the UFC can make just about every fight fans want to see.

And theory, taking over Strikeforce should expand the UFC's list of potential pay-per-view headliners.

After all, who wouldn't wanto to see Strikeforce heavyweight champ Allistair Overeem throw down with Cain Velasquez?

Or watch Strikeforce 155-pound dynamo Gilbert Melendez tangle with any of the UFC's talented crop of lightweights.

Or see Herschel Walker take on Randy Couture in a Battle of the Aged.

Aside from Walker-Couture, the appetite among fans for those fights and many others exist.

But for the UFC, for the moment, the desire to make them happen doesn't.

 

02/17/2011

Former champ Witter hopes to revive career in Mississauga

The folks from Hennessy Sports might be world wide players in boxing, promoting world champs like Carl Froch, but lately they've been hustling hard to breathe life into the local pro scene, even buying commercial time during last Sunday's Heat-Celtics game to hype this Saturday's card at the Hershey Centre.

Makes sense.

A card with so much local flavour needs a lot of local hype.

Orangeville's Logan Cotton McGuinness headlines his third straight Hershey Centre event, and the undercard features a welterweight showdown between Mississauga residents Samuel Vargas and Tebor Brosch.

But in addition to fighters trying to build a following in the 416/905, Hennessy has also infused this card with some star power, even if it's faded.

Junior-Witter


Saturday's undercard features England's Junior Witter, a former WBC champ at 140 who defended his title four times before losing to Timothy Bradley in May 2008. He hasn't fought since an eighth-round stoppage loss to Devon Alexander 18 months ago, but Saturday the 36-year-old starts the climb back to the top of the ranking, facing Toronto-based Romanian Victor Puiu.

Thursday afternoon I caught up with him at a media workout in Mississauga, and without ace videographer Randy Risling I had to fend for myself. So I filmed with the Canon point-n-shoot, fired up iMovie for the first time ever and put together this video on Junior Witter and the comeback that begins right here in the GTA.

 

01/26/2011

Motoring through Detroit to catch a Super Fight

That would be the 140-pound title unification bout between Timothy (Desert Storm) Bradley and Devon  Alexander (The Great), which takes place Saturday night at the Pontiac Silverdome.

I've assembled a crew, secured a car and a place to stay, and Friday morning we head to one of my favourite cities to see an early candidate for fight of the year. 

As some of you know I spent six months of my rookie year in pro journalism interning at the Detroit News, so I have a huge soft spot for the city, even through the body blows it has suffered in recent years.

The economic downturn.

Kwame Kilpatrick.

The Lions.

It's easy to kick the city while it's on its knees, so I'm happy whenever a fight promoter decides to bring an important bout to an area that has contributed so much to boxing.

In this respect boxing is following the lead of the UFC, which could have brought November's showdown between Quentin Jackson and Lyoto Machida anywhere but chose to stage the event in Auburn Hills.

Likewise, a unification bout between undefeated champions, neither with ties to the area, is a coup for metro Detroit. Butfor me it's still bittersweet that, like Jackson and Machida, they'll trade punches 20 miles north of the city.

It's sort of like celebrating Toronto with a big party in Newmarket.

And let's face it, the suburbs don't have the same connection to boxing history that the city does. 

Joe Louis' home base. Sugar Ray Robinson's birthplace. Home of the legendary Kronk Gym.

The common thread there isn't Metro Detroit.

It's Detroit.

And let's face something else.

As accomplished and hungry as Bradley and Alexander are, they don't have the juice to sell out the cavernous Silverdome the way Hulk Hogan and Andre the Giant did in 1987. In fact, the seating configuration for Saturday's fight reportedly will accommodate no more than 15,000 spectators.

But if you focus on everything Saturday's fight doesn't have, I don't have to be Black Milk to tell you you're losing out.

 

Both Bradley and Alexander bring a whole lot to Saturday's showdown to make it worth watching for both hardcore and casual fans.

1. The Stakes -- Somebody's "0" will go.

How often do we see undefeated champions butt heads with the stakes this high?

Bradley-vs-Alexander
Not often, since these days the only thing more rare than an undefeated champ is an undefeated fighter willing to put his unblemished record in real danger with this size of challenge.

These days our guy Floyd Mayweather (justifiably) takes heat from critics who wonder if he's more concerned with protecting his undefeated record than defending it. But a decade ago he wasn't that guy. In January 2001 he was what Bradley and Alexander are now -- an undefeated champ risking his belt and perfect record against a fighter in Diego Corrales who was doing the same.

The bout turned into a whitewash, with Mayweather out-thinking Corrales and dropping him five times on the way to a 10th-round TKO, but heading into that bout few boxing experts could pick a winner. 

When sizing up a pair of fighters who matched up so evenly on paper the what became most clear about that fight was that win or lose both fighters deserved immense respect for tackling the challenge.

If there has been a more significant matching of undefeated champs in the decade since Mayweather-Corrales than the Bradley-Alexander bout, I can't recall it.

And if you can't pick a winner yet between Bradley and Alexander I can't blame you. 

2. Styles -- they make fights

Between the two men Alexander is by far the more stylish boxer, but he also packs plenty of power. If you don't believe me ask Colombia's Juan Urango, whom Alexander flattened last March.

 

Bradley, meanwhile, mixes relentless pressure with smart movement. As his knockout record (11KOs in 26 wins) attests, he doesn't possess Alexander's one-punch power. But he can sting you, and those shots add up. He's boxer enough to shut down foes who think they can outwit him, but fighter enough to bang with bigger opponents.

If you don't believe me ask Luis Carlos Abregu, whom Bradley decisioned last summer.

 

Their styles may diverge but they have an opponent in common: Junior Witter, a former world champ from England who will try to resuscitate his career iFeb. 19 at a United Promotions card at Mississauga's Hershey Centre.

If it helps you choose between these two, Bradley nipped Witter by split decision in May 2008, while the following summer Alexander outboxed Witter cleanly over eight rounds before their titled bout was stopped.

3. The Bigger Picture

After negotiations between Mayweather and Manny Pacquiao collapsed last December, and before Mayweather signed to fight Shane Mosley, rumours swirled that Money was looking for a 140-pounder to lure to welterweight for "superfight" and a seven-figure payday.

At the time I remember thinking I'd boycott any such bout on principle -- unless that 140-pounder named Timothy Bradley.

While Mayweather waits on the sideline as his legal issues play out, the winner Saturday night gains the credentials and publicity required to enter the Mayweather/Pacquiao future opponent lottery. 

And if not, both men remain in the middle of a frighteningly intense round-robin at 140 pounds, and in the running for yet another massive matchup -- an eventual showdown with Pacquiao stablemate Amir Khan.

Either way, Saturday's fight is both the culmination of a unification process that began when Bradley claimed his first world title in 2008, and the beginning of what looks like a long run of high-skill, high-stakes matchups in one of boxing's hottest divisions.

And I'll be ringside, giving you the details on the blog and on twitter.

So load the car and cue the Slum Village (RIP Dilla and Baatin) because we're headed to Detroit.

Or at least through it on the way to the superfight.

 

Fighting Words

  • From the ring to the octagon, from mixed martial arts to the sweet science, National Newspaper Award winner Morgan Campbell covers all angles of the fight game.