« Tonight's early lineup notes | Main | D'oh!-chenski »

September 23, 2005

Comments

denial

technical difficulties. yeah. i like that one, too. have you tried "religious holiday"? that's a good one if you're actually talking to the techhies.

Don't you think Thomas would make a perfect Crash Davis type-o-player for the Marlies? Someone who can help those kids understand what it takes to make it -- both the highs and the lows -- through an entire NHL career?

if it were up to me (blah), i'd joyously pay him $500k to play for the marlies. the work he could do there could be invaluable.

but of course he wouldn't do that, and the leafs wouldn't pay him to do that, either.

said it before: luongo is losing years off his career because of what he's being subjected to by the panther's anti-defense. maybe keenan will fix that, but he's not a miracle worker. every year luongo plays in florida is like 2 years playing anywhere else.it's like dog years. call them panther years.

the coyotes aren't going to win with brett hull on their team. sorry wayne, that was a dumb move that you should have never signed off on.

I can't picture Bobby Holik being emotional about much, except maybe being called Ivan Drago by accident.

He must break you.


ja

kind of off topic -- but it's been on my chest..

ferguson did a pretty solid job in attracting guys with big potential to the team this summer (for a cheap price). but, it's the bevvy of smaller signings that make no sense. antropov for a million, domi for 1.5, berg for around a mil, belak for whatever. if he had held back from signing these guys (who, let's admit it, are all replaceable with people from within our system), he would've had enough money to get a solid d-man -- like roman hamrlik ($3.5) -- and really improve the club.

arghh.

denial

hey cy....would very much like to hear your and your editor's take on Damien Cox's article today about the shootout being too short. i personally began to have regan-from-the-exorcism like convulsions when i read the quote from mike murphy:

"The competition committee went with three shots because it was felt it was easier for the in-house audience and people watching on TV to follow," league executive Mike Murphy said yesterday.

"When you have five shots, you can get lost in the score sometimes and, if nobody wins after five shots, you begin to lose the novelty and lose what the shootout is all about.

...my God. where to start? everything wrong with the shootout is encapsulated in this statement, and murphy doesn't even see it.

The comments to this entry are closed.

The Hockey Page


  • Welcome to the Star's hockey page. The waymoresports.com crew dishes the news and gossip from around the NHL with a special focus on the Maple Leafs. Use the comments link at the bottom of each post to leave your opinion - and check back regularly for the latest.