« A night of firsts | Main | All this, and Theo Fleury too »

October 13, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf8f353ef00d834bde49869e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Everything's, uh, great, maybe:

Comments

gt

About the "Kid" line, Quinn might try it out. But toss away any notions of permanance. Everyone knows, how much Quinn values veteran experience over youthful exuberance and energy even at the cost of the team. Look at Berg.

Matt C.

The "KID LINE" idea is a great one. They have awesome chemistry and have earned a position on the Leafs aquad. Stajan has considerable NHL experience, Steen is a natural and Welwood should have been in the Blue and White all alone. An amazing player; and we have only witnessed a fraction of what he can produce. Although we are taking about Quinn here and well this Idea probably won't fly with him.
GO LEAFS GO !!

Aaron

In the above column, there's a quote saying, "There is a pattern there that makes sense in a d’uh kind of way – the more penalties, the more goals."

However, the listed stats can't be interpreted that way. I won't bore you with the math, but when you do the calculations of ratios of goals to penalties, there is no apparent relationship between "more penalties, more goals." when you compare them. (try it yourself - 77 goals/186 minors, etc.) Also, there is no reference here to how many of the goals are power play goals.

So if you look at the special teams numbers, you get the real eye-openers: Calgary is only killing 56% of their penalties so far - yikes! When was the last time that happened? And a heap of teams are in the 70% range. This is a lot more indicative of the effects of new rule changes: by the numbers, penalty-killers are no longer effective because they are scared out of their minds of going down another man if they touch an attacking player.

But it's early yet. Like you say, check back at Christmas.

cy

Aaron, you are correct. my mistake here was in following along the logic suggested by the Avs announcers: that scoring was down the night before around the league, perhaps because they were letting some of the clutch and grab go uncalled -- and in this game, a lot of penalties were being called early, so do you think the league has told 'em to work the whistle a little harder? Like I said, serves me right for listening.

The comments to this entry are closed.

The Hockey Page


  • Welcome to the Star's hockey page. The waymoresports.com crew dishes the news and gossip from around the NHL with a special focus on the Maple Leafs. Use the comments link at the bottom of each post to leave your opinion - and check back regularly for the latest.