One of the suggestions being bandied about on how to improve pedestrian safety in the GTA is to follow Montreal's lead and outlaw right turns on red lights.
That at least is the profferred reason why car-hating David Miller, Toronto's Mayor of Some of the People Except Those who Own Cars has instituted a no-right-on-red trial here in the City.
(Maybe he hates turning right under any circumstances hahaha a little political joke there...).
In a story on this topic on Page GT1 last Thursday, The Star showed data on pedestrian deaths per 100,000 population for major Canadian urban areas.
Calgary was lowest at 0.73. NOBODY walks in Calgary.
Vancouver was highest at 1.73. NOBODY drives in Vancouver.
Are you catching my drift here?
Ottawa - lot of walkers there when it isn't frozen solid - 1.23.
Toronto is 1.16, lowest apart from Calgary.
Montreal? 1.17.
Oh yeah, we can learn at lot from them.
Jim, what do you think is the cause of all the pedestrian deaths? I think it has something to do with the mild weather that we've been having. It gives us the sense that we can drive like it's summer even though it is still dark during rush hour. Plus pedestrians are less inclined to stay inside.
Posted by: JF | January 26, 2010 at 10:50 PM
However, there are more walkers in Montreal than in Toronto. So a more relevant statistic would be pedestrian deaths per 100,000 walkers.
Posted by: Zaki | January 28, 2010 at 01:11 PM
Hey Jim,
As both a pedestrian and driver, I find that if the pedestrian crosses behind the first car turning right, it makes it safer for the both of us. I almost hit someone a couple times (early morning not entirely awake) because I neglected to look right after checking the cars on the left. Skip the first car, and avoid getting run over. I cross the road that way now, since I drive.
By the way, have been reading this blog for a long time now, usually agreeing with you. I think its time for action!
Posted by: Lotte | January 28, 2010 at 06:46 PM
In Calgary, pedestrians get the right of way. Not in Toronto. Drivers assign all responsibility to the pedestrians, thinking- as long as they look then I won't hit them.
In Calgary, drivers have to watch and look and stop for the pedestrians. This is the only, and the best way to prevent car vs pedestrian collisions.
As I drive both in Ontario and in Alberta, I can feel the neglect on the driver's part in terms of the attitude toward pedestrian safety. In Calgary, when a car meets a person, by law, the car loses.
Here its, 'well, the light was green over there, red here and the car was turning right...blah blah..' non sense.
Posted by: Vince Choi | January 29, 2010 at 12:51 PM
As a Vancouver resident, I have to question the claim that "NOBODY drives in Vancouver." The real difference between Vancouver and other cities? You can walk comfortably twelve months of the year in Vancouver. That's bound to skew the results.
Posted by: Morty | January 30, 2010 at 08:22 PM
Doesn't it make sense to have a bus stop after a traffic light instead of the stop at the corner before the light?
This will help because:
1. - The bus driver doesn't need to hurry to pass the amber light after picking up passengers.
2. - Pedestrians don't need to run in front of the bus after getting off to catch another bus on the opposite side.
3. - The vehicle driver wanting to turn right on the red can see everything at the corner where he/she wants to turn.
4. - The right turn driver doesn't need to cut in front of the stopped bus at the traffic light for a right turn.
Posted by: Frustrate Driver | February 01, 2010 at 12:41 PM
Hi "Frustrated":
These all seem like perfectly reasonable arguments to me.
Wonder if the TTC is reading??
Jim
Posted by: Jim Kenzie | February 01, 2010 at 01:43 PM
Hi:
As with most things which appear to be statistical aberrations, I suspect there are a number of things going on simultaneously w/r/t pedestrian deaths.
There is always an element of randomness in any set of statistics. It may be no more than that.
Local 'out-of-character' weather may indeed be a factor. Like the Vancouverite noted a few comments ago, the greater number of people who walk and the longer distances they walk - and in nicer weather - the more opportunities exist.
I also do not know whether "one-a-day" is really that far from the norm. Maybe this current spate of deaths is simply reminding us how dangerous walking really is!
Posted by: Jim Kenzie | February 01, 2010 at 02:20 PM