There's no (free) wireless at the Javits Center where the New York Auto Show is taking place - press days today and tomorrow.
So I can't blog on it.
But you can 'follow' me on Twitter using 'jim_kenzie' for details.
« February 2010 | Main | April 2010 »
There's no (free) wireless at the Javits Center where the New York Auto Show is taking place - press days today and tomorrow.
So I can't blog on it.
But you can 'follow' me on Twitter using 'jim_kenzie' for details.
Posted at 04:50 PM in A tester's life | Permalink | Comments (0)
The Toronto Board of Trade published a study earlier this week that said Toronto has the longest average commute of any major city.
Worse even than Los Angeles.
This caused the Usual Suspects at City Hall to scream for more funding for subways and other mass transit systems.
They seem to forget ex-Ford and Chrysler CEO Lee Iacocca's famous quip that he too built mass-transit systems.
The study also showed that Toronto has among the best, if not the very best, score when it came to education and intelligence of its work force.
The obvious conclusion, which apparently isn't obvious enough for said Usual Suspects, is that - for whatever reasons - smart people choose to drive.
Wouldn't it make sense to make it easier, not harder, for smart people to do what they want?
Apparently not.
Remember this when the civic elections roll around this fall.
Posted at 12:06 PM in A tester's life, Current Affairs, Driving habits, Environment, Industry surveys, Science | Permalink | Comments (9) | TrackBack (0)
This movable pixelboard sign currently sits just north of Number 5 Sideroad on Highway (sorry; now 'Regional Road') 25, about four km north of 401.
It appears to be an attempt to show drunks while they are sober that drinking and driving is a stupid, dangerous idea.
Now, who could possibly think otherwise?
But obviously this person didn't think so.
At a Blood Alcohol Level around 0.28 (2 1/2 times the limit of 0.08; 0.40 is darn-near dead, so this person was major league blotto), he (and I am making an assumption there, although drunk drivers are predominantly if not overwhelmingly male) was hardly in a position to think at all.
But he was able to get into his car and manoeuvre at least this far (I don't know where the trip started).
This is also an odd place for a crash. Straight road, decent visibility, no driveways, not much of anything. I guess he just ran off the road.
This seems to be an even more in-your-face warning than those little shrines (typically crosses, flowers, etc.) family members or friends of the crash victims often erect at the scene.
There is probably no way to measure the effectiveness of signs like this.
One thing for sure; you can't miss them, and they can't hurt.
Posted at 12:06 AM in A tester's life, Current Affairs, Driving habits, Legal matters | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
If you missed the debut showing of the Targa Newfoundland 2009 TV show on TSN a few weeks ago, you'll get another chance on Saturday, March 27.
Maybe two chances.
It will be on the SPEED Channel for those of you who subscribe, at 6:00 p.m. Eastern time.
It will also be on 'Motors TV' on the same day. Now I must say I am not familiar with that particular channel. Maybe it's a regional thing? As they say, 'check your local listings'.
Personally, I think it is the best Targa production yet, even if I'm not the narrator any more! TV2GO's Lawrence Partington and his team, who comprise one of the best videographing squads anywhere especially when it comes to rallying, have assembled terrific shots of the cars, the people, the scenery and the event.
Don't miss it.
Posted at 06:57 PM in A tester's life, Personalities, Sports, Television, Travel | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Some of you may have noted that the above blog post looked weird on Tuesday - sentences running past the end of the line, odd letters popping up here and there.
I have no idea what happened, but I have a clue as to WHY it happened.
You see, now that I have a - gasp - iPhone, I can theoretically post blogs on the road. (I am also 'tweeting', fer cryin' out loud).
I posted that entry from my iPhone, having originally typed it using an iPhone app called EVERNOTE. I cut-and-pasted it into the TypePad blogging software we use here, and it looked to be OK.
When I clicked on "View your Post", it did look a bit odd, but I figured that was just because I was viewing it on my iPhone as well.
But a loyal reader e-mailed me tonight to say it still looked odd, so I have fixed it using the trusty laptop.
I will try to come up with a better explanation and/or work-around, because blogging from the road is sort of the point of having an iPhone!
BTW, I do not seem to be able to use the 'classic' version of TypePad on the iPhone, which I find much easier to use than the so-called 'new and improved' version, so the likelihood of typos increases when I enter posts from the iPhone.
Also, it does not seem to be possible to assign 'multiple' categories to a post from the iPhone, as I can do from the laptop.
I'll see if I can figure that out too.
Any hints warmly welcomed!
Posted at 01:49 AM in A tester's life, Driving habits, Film, Personalities, Pet peeves | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
In the movie "The Blind Side", Sandra Bullock won an Oscar for her portrayal of a rich Southern blonde who helps a poor black kid become a football star.
More important, at one point she tells her young son when he gets into her BMW 7 Series to "Put on your seat belt!"
Throughout the movie she is also wearing her own belt.
OK, so a car crash was a minor plot point later on, and the kid wouldn't have survived without a belt.
The movie is based on a true story. Whether this part is true or not, I don't know. I mean: Deep South USA? Seat belts? You'd have to tie up your disbelief in a plain brown wrapper and mail it to Peoria.
But I'll take small victories wherever I can find them.
Other movie and TV directors, please copy.
And one of the young girl characters in the movie is named ''Kenzie". When did that become a girl's name?
Posted at 03:22 PM in A tester's life, Current Affairs, Film, Personalities, Pet peeves | Permalink | Comments (0)
Memo to the 'drive wise' driving school of Milton: time to update your curriculum.
Or to give your instructor who was in a black Mazda 323 sedan with a young female student heading south on Highway 25 approaching Highway 401 at around 2:30 p.m. this past Sunday a whack upside the head.
Two things:
First, you should instruct all your students to always switch on their headlights, all the time - but especially on dark, drizzly days like this one, and in a black car, because the Daytime Running Lights do not turn on the taillights.
Second, you really should teach your students to obey perhaps the most important 'Rule of the Road' - Drive Right. The highway expands to two lanes each way once past James Snow Parkway. I gave your student plenty of time and room to move to the right lane, but she made no effort to do so. Yes, that dark gray Porsche 911 Targa that passed you on the right was me. Your students should know that passing on the right IS legal; BEING passed on the right means you are violating at least two provisions of Ontario's Highway Traffic Act.
It's never too early to teach new drivers good habits.
Posted at 08:26 AM in A tester's life | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
My column on "Would I let my wife and children ride in a Toyota?" generated a lot of response.
Most of it was favourable, and I thank those of you who responded thus.
But it is always more fun, and ultimately more informative, to let those who don't agree with me have their say.
Then I can also correct their wayward thinking!
One reader writes:
***
I cannot remember the last time I was motivated to write to any columnist.
I have always respected your opinions in the auto world. BUT your response in this morning's Toronto Star in answer to the question "would you let your wife and children ride in a Toyota"?
"Yes I would"?????
What on earth are you thinking? How much more evidence do you need than some of the recorded incidents recently revealed and Toyota's almost criminal attitude and cover up?
Jim, you are worthy of better.....take a second thought and offer a retraction. People's lives are at stake here.
***
The reader didn't expressly give me permission to use his name, so I won't. I simply want to address the issue he raises.
As I always have said, thousands of parts arrive from hundreds of companies in dozens of countries, to a corn field in Kentucky or a potato field in Ontario. The car maker pays some kid $14 an hour to screw them together - it's a minor miracle that they EVER work, let alone occasionally don't.
I have also said - as I did in this story - that Toyota has handled the situation badly.
That doesn't change the fact that the automobile is by far the most complicated product you own; it is by far the least expensive product you own, if measured against that level of complexity; it is BY FAR the worst-treated product you own (do you leave your Bang and Olufsen stereo out in the rain? Do you drag your Nikon camera through the mud?); and it is BY FAR the most reliable and best-warranted product you own as well.
Statistically, the chances of a Toyota owner having any of these problems is almost vanishingly small. Sure, it happens - but so do lottery winners. That doesn't make buying a lottery ticket a smart thing to do.
There are a million things happening out on our roads that are vastly more dangerous than problem Toyotas. Our court system tearing apart our Charter of Rights, for example. Impaired drivers. People who run red lights. People who STILL don't wear their seat belts. People who don't drive in the right lane. People who don't drive with their headlights on.
If we spent a tenth as much attention on these massively more critical issues as we have on Toyota, we'd all be much safer.
And yes, my daughter drives a Toyota. My wife often borrows our neighbours' Toyota.
I don't give it a second's thought.
###
Another reader agreed with me that Toyotas are generally reliable. He and his family have had good luck with their Camry and 4Runner; good service from their dealer too.
But he went on to add:
***
...[my] purpose in writing initially was the subject of 'Runaway cars' that you hear about on the news occasionally. People are panicking, putting both feet on the brakes, (?) and generally losing their cool, and their cars. They seem to forget the most basic thing to do when the engine runs away.
And that is: TURN THE KEY OFF! ... That simple act will shut down the engine right now. The ECU goes dead, the ignition goes dead, the fuel pump goes dead, the sensors go dead, everything shuts off. Then it's simple to use the engine as a brake, as well as the foot brake to bring the vehicle to a controlled stop.
I have had [one automotive] engine runaway, on a Subaru Legacy. ... I shut the
key off... and pulled [it] out, and realizing my mistake, had a mad scramble to get it back in before my steering locked up.
The engine died right now.... I was able to stop the car safely, and look into the problem. ( I still don't know, I had the car towed to the dealer.)
I have written to yours and other newspapers, as well as the CBC, and CTV telling them to pass it on to the public: "Turn the key off!"
Not one of the media has done so or even responded to my concerns.
One so called expert was on C.T.V. telling the public to: "Put the transmission in neutral, steer off the road and use the brakes, then turn off the engine." I can guess your thoughts on that one! My thoughts go along the line of 'What is this guy drinking???'
***
Well, "this guy" suggesting you select neutral was probably me, and the strongest thing I drink is Perrier.
Because that is EXACTLY what you should do if your engine starts to race.
Virtually every car expert agrees on this - I have pointed out various web sites that offer the same suggestion in this blog before, if you don't believe me.
DO NOT - I REPEAT, DO NOT - TURN OFF THE KEY!
Turning off the key not only runs the very real and hyper-dangerous risk of locking your steering - as this reader already knows! - but by shutting the engine (ECU, fuel pump, sensors, etc.) off you also lose power assist to the brakes or steering, both of which make it very difficult to bring the car under control.
And because most cars these days are automatics there would be little or no engine braking to speak of even if the engine were shut off.
There is absolutely NO downside to selecting neutral. Sure, the engine will rev like crazy, but virtually all car engines these days have rev limiters; it'll get noisy but it won't damage the engine. Once you get the car safely off on the side of the road (four-way flashers on please!) then and ONLY then should you switch off the engine.
I have indeed passed this information on, to various TV and radio stations (including the CBC and CTV), I've reported it in the print edition of Wheels, here in my blog, and in a special video clip we ran on The Star's website, using the very same Toyota Matrix which experienced one of the 'sticky accelerator pedal' situations - it caused an 82-year old woman to crash into a pile of firewood at her local supermarket. Before anyone blames it on her age, she had complained to her dealership several times about this problem, and they told her nothing was wrong, it was 'normal', it was just her getting used to her new car. In this instance it happened at precisely the wrong time, just as she was pulling in to a parking space, and caught her unaware. She did not have time to react in any way, and probably under the same circumstances, neither would any of us.
So it DOES happen. All we need do is teach people how to react properly if it does, and I hope this reader - and all of you! - you will now join me in spreading the correct gospel!
As noted, this reader and his family have had good luck with your Toyotas. As my story suggests, most people have. But like all car companies, they have had their issues, and it seems there's been a slew of them recently. That, plus the cumulative effect (and the ambulance chaser effect!) have made it seem worse than it really is.
That said, one of my auto journalist colleagues actually had one of the very FIRST known instances of a Prius 'running away'. I believe it was the second-generation car, maybe even the first - it was quite some time ago, but he just told me about it last week. He had his feet clear of both pedals, no floor mat interference - the engine just revved away on its own. He managed to bring the car to a stop, and shut it off. He restarted it, but neither he nor Toyota Canada could ever replicate the scenario. But I have no reason to doubt him; he's a pretty serious knowledgeable 'car guy'.
And I personally know only three people who have owned Toyota Sienna minivans, yet ALL THREE have had their engines blow up at around 60,000 km. There is a well-known sludge build-up problem with this engine which seems to manifest itself more frequently in the Sienna than in other applications (I think this is basically the same engine as in this reader's 4Runner, but of course it is transverse-mounted and front-wheel drive in the Sienna.) The problem is apparently often traced to less-than-religious changing of the oil, and hence is probably to some degree the customers' fault. But North Americans in particular have gotten used to their engines surviving indifferent maintenance, and especially with a company with Toyota's reputation, they probably think they're OK - and they aren't.
So, we should maintain our cars, enjoy them when they work as the should, and always be prepared in case sometimes they don't!
And remember; as Honda's recent brake recall indicates, "All Mothers do have 'em!"
Posted at 05:36 AM in A tester's life, Current Affairs, Driving habits, Industry woes, Legal matters | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
In my post from a few days ago, I suggested that something sounded 'fishy' about this latest 'runaway Prius' in San Diego.
The car got up to 94 miles an hour - 150 km/h; can a Prius actually GO that fast? - before the guy was able to bring it under control, ruining his brakes in the process.
And he refused to put it into Neutral as the cop driving alongside him suggested because he was afraid the car might 'flip'.
Are there really people that stupid out there?
Now, allegations are being bandied about that the entire thing was a hoax.
Balloon Boy redux.
I may have been (among) the first to have suspicions, but apparently not the last.
Subsequent investigation of the car shows the accelerator pedal was working fine, as were all the other car's systems.
I suppose it is within the realm of technical possibility that there was a simultaneous, complete and transient failure of several of the car's systems, that the incident left not the slightest trace in the car's amazingly complex computer systems, and that said incident can not be replicated after the fact.
It just isn't very likely.
It also turns out that if you DO shift a Prius into Neutral, which is the first thing you should do in ANY car if you experience rampant acceleration, the accelerator pedal is rendered inoperable.
Should you decide to switch the entire propulsion system off (again, not really recommended) remember it's like a Microsoft Windows computer - you shut it off by pressing and holding the Start button...
There is a very informative but very graphic - as in foul-mouthed and politically-incorrect in the EXTREME - video clip on YouTube which illustrates what to do in case your Prius 'runs away' with you.
If you are offended by the 'f-bomb', do not - I repeat DO NOT - paste this URL into your browser (I have given up trying to make hot links work in this blogging software).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZ4PtafRB9c&feature=player_embedded
Don't say I didn't warn you.
For a considerably more polite, technically similar but not pant-wettingly funny variant on the same theme by the well-regarded Edmunds.com folks, try this one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqG4mZbM9rs&feature=PlayList&p=1759CC4DCB194FA3&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=77
Either one will prove that there is NO way a Prius can run away from you unless you're - well, check the videos...
Posted at 09:32 PM in A tester's life, Current Affairs, Driving habits, Industry woes, Legal matters, Science | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Doppelkublungsgetriebe.
Easy for me to say...
It means "Double-Clutch gearbox".
(I was going to 'tweet' on this - follow me on 'jim_kenzie' - but there is no way to sum this up in 140 characters.)
Porsche apparently invented the double-clutch gearbox for its 917 race cars many years ago. For some reason the company chose not to put it into their own production cars, but to licence it to others. According to Porsche anyway, every car maker which uses the concept pays royalties.
Finally, Porsche fitted it to its own vehicles, and most of the Porkers I've driven in the past couple of years have been so-equipped.
I really admire both the technological proficiency and the unbeatable performance of the PDK (that's Porsche-Doppel-Kublungsgetriebe to you); like it or not, it shifts faster and better than you can.
That said, the 911 Turbo that is my hot rod du jour has the standard six-speed manual, and I have to say I have really enjoyed driving this car - and this gearbox.
It requires a bit of effort to shift - when a transmission has to handle this much torque, the shift effort cannot be Miata-light.
But the precision is brilliant, you always know exactly what gear you're in, and what gear you're heading for.
All the more amazing considering the transmission itself is way out back there in another area code.
Clutch take-up is surprisingly smooth and easy, although I have managed to botch a few launches, trying to get away too quickly.
That's the thing about the Double-Clutch gearbox, and the challenge of the manual: the former is fool-proof; the latter proves you know what you're doing.
Or not.
The rest of the car is simply spectacular.
The speed is of course part of it.
A BIG part of it.
But so is the refinement. The engine is flexible, you can tootle around in top gear (not that you'd want to) and it is not at all difficult to drive.
Until you hammer on the loud pedal. Better know what you're doing, especially if it's wet. Four-wheel drive can only do so much for you.
Yes, the ride is very firm. Big bumps or potholes will rattle your fillings, your spine, nearby buildings.
But the body itself is stunningly stiff.
The door-closing sound alone is almost worth the price of admission.
And when did Porsche interiors get this gorgeous? My test car is painted a deep, rich-looking gray, with matte-finished gray wheels and a lovely red leather interior. The fit and finish are maybe even beyond Audi levels.
Great seats, the engine makes a lovely noise, there's even reasonable cargo room although you do have to travel light.
Chances are it won't be your only car.
But when you have the choice and/or the opportunity, it will be the only one you'll want to drive.
Posted at 07:29 PM in A tester's life, New car news | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)