It was foggy, wet and miserable in the GTA this past Monday.
(I actually wrote this then, but never got around to posting it...)
And - an old beef, I know - about 90 percent of the cars on the road did not have their lights on, just their Daytime Running Lights.
Which meant of course that especially on the highway, you couldn't see them until you were right on top of them.
I really wish I could pull people over and ask them, "Did you notice that the car ahead of you just now did not have any taillights on? That you could barely see it in the haze and the road spray? Doesn't it make you even the slightest bit curious whether other drivers are saying the same about your car?"
I mean, what were these people thinking about as they drove through this mess?
Or are they in a fog in the metaphoric sense too?
Some of you folks out there are much savvier about this whole InterWeb FaceTube thing than I am.
Somehow, that set of media has managed to make cats and hamburgers world-wide phenomena.
Geez; it has made Justin Bieber the world's Number One Twit.
Isn't there some way we can use modern information technology to get the message across:
TURN ON YOUR FRIGGIN' LIGHTS!
OK, so maybe turning on your lights isn't 'cool', hence isn't worthy of attention by this cohort of our population.
But I don't know that there's anything all that cool about standing at the side of the highway exchanging insurance information with the guy who just rammed into the back of your car.
Or, waiting for an ambulance.
I must say, it was considerably better in the evening Monday. Maybe people understood that after 5 p.m., it is supposed to be 'dark', and lights might be a good idea.
But there are always a few. Just last evening, 7:15 p.m., 401 eastbound at the airport, a guy in a newish Subaru Legacy (I think; obviously, it was hard to see...) was cruising along, nearly invisible from behind. As I drove up to then past him, I flicked my lights off and on (in the new Range Rover, you can actually do that; you can't in most new cars) and tooted my horn to try and indicate that he had a problem.
I could see his dash lights were on which, as I have noted several times, should not be allowed when DRL is active by Transport Canada regulation because of exactly this reason - it fools you into thinking your real lights ARE on.
He pulled on his turn signal lever to flash his high beams at me. Not sure what he thought he was trying to communicate to me.
But he never turned on his real lights.
Since Transport Canada doesn't seem to think this is an issue, and I've received lots of feedback from you to indicate that I'm not alone in thinking this IS an issue, I am appealing for help.
I assume you all know how to fix this for ourselves - always run with full lights on, all the time.
You do, don't you?
I do. Always have, since I first started to drive.
It's the only sensible thing to do
But how do we fix this for the Great Unwashed out there?
Jim,
I feel your pain on this issue. It's no better in B.C.
Is there anyway we could contact Transport Canada to suggest that DRL be changed so that tail lights are ON and dash lights are OFF?
Funny how DRL might have actually made the situation worse, instead of better.
Greg
Posted by: Greg | January 31, 2013 at 11:58 PM
I just have to remember that flashing your high beams means "radar ahead" flashing your lights means "turn on your headlights".
Jim, I agree with you on all points. In fact, things are even worse than you say. How? I only drive 30Km to my office, however I always come across someone without their full lights on, even in complete darkness. It once took me and another guy flashing our lights at a Ford Focus to get him to clue in.
But it's even worse...
I would say that every other day I see some car or SUV through the darkness with no lights on at all. Late models, so not pre-DRL era. Ontario plates, so most likely not a US car (DRL is still not required in US? AFAIK). What's going on? The only explaination I can find in researching this is people are actually disabling their DRLs in order to install xenon headlights. Then they don't turn them on anyway, so what's the point?
People are actually disabling safety systems in their car to look "cool"?
Don't get me started on the Chrysler Co. and Audis that actually turn off a headlight when you turn on the turn signal.
Posted by: Brian | February 01, 2013 at 09:43 AM
Of course lights should be on all the time; I have enough problem with my own driving without worrying that some distracted idiot can't see me. The bigger problem in our neck of the woods is vehicles with no DRL's at all. On a less than 20 km drive I typically see more than 10 vehicles with no DRL's. This is outside of rush hour so I'm guessing 2%-5% or so of vehicles I meet. Too many! Many of these must be (illegally)disabling the DRL's for some reason. I can't imagine we are experiencing an epidemic of burnt-out bulbs hitting this area. Alien attack maybe? I asked a local cop about the problem... he hadn't noticed and told me only late model cars needed DRL's. Late model?... Yeah..after 1990 when the law went into effect.
Posted by: Larry Mitz | February 01, 2013 at 01:33 PM