If you can then YOU'RE Stirling Moss - fifty years ago.
Because the sign indicating it IS Eglinton Avenue is located only on the far side of the intersection itself.
By the time you get close enough to realise this, and if you want to
turn left, then (assuming of course you're in the right lane where
logic, courtesy and the law require you to be) you've got three lanes
plus (in this case) two left-turn lanes to negotiate, all in about a
hundred meters of 60 km/h road.
Not good.
Why isn't there a sign a few hundred metres back up the road, indicating that this up-coming intersection is in fact Eglinton? You'd have plenty of time to react.
Not everybody can afford a car with SatNav, with Doris of the Dashboard telling you where you are at every moment.
Sure, you'd still want the sign at the intersection itself.
But more advance warning?
It would make a huge difference.
I'm not picking on Mississauga here. Every municipality in the GTA - frankly, almost everywhere in the world - is guilty of this to some degree.
What makes it particularly frustrating is that not half a klick away, just around that left-hand turn, they have done exactly that. If you're headed west on Eglinton approaching Credit Valley Road, here's what you see:
Well, they could put a sign on a pole in the centre median too, as they do in some instances.
Here, they've even put the house number range on the sign, so if you know the exact address you're looking for, you know which way you have to turn.
It is clear then that somebody within the Mississauga transportation department (road sign division...) knows how this is supposed to be done.
My question: why aren't they consistently doing it correctly?
Of course, if they'd just eliminate these stupid, sprawling, horribly dangerous, traffic-light-controlled multi-lane intersections altogether and replace them with roundabouts, the problem (and dozens of others) would cease to exist.
But no municipality within the GTA is smart enough to figure that out; I admit, I'm aiming low here, hoping that a few more properly-positioned road signs can at least alleviate the danger.
It would be a start.
Good idea. And I don't understand why they can't use the hydro poles to mount all the signs; it would be cheaper.
Posted by: zaki | January 25, 2013 at 12:20 PM
re: signage vs pooped peepers
getting older means stronger prescription glasses, right?
maybe not: those pinhole glasses which were sold 30+yrs ago& were banned by N.American eye doc groups for many years,& are now back at Amazon, really do help for stinging&weary PC-stressed eyes,& additionally, by working muscles in those of us depending on corrective lenses result in, at least,in this old roadracer/mechanic's case,having to revert to weaker spec glasses...5 minutes a day is all it took for moi.Sorta like yoga for the eyes. cheers
Posted by: dar | January 26, 2013 at 01:33 PM
I can certainly tell you where Oakville Exec Golf Courses is, though.
Posted by: Richard | January 27, 2013 at 11:27 AM
They really should rearrange the road signs for that place. First timers will really waste a lot of time because those signs are not place properly.
Posted by: Ella Strahan | March 07, 2013 at 12:48 AM
Some road sign needs to be replaced or removed because some are not applicable anymore. People who install road signs should be responsible if something happens to people who get confused.
Posted by: Eliza Corlis | March 07, 2013 at 09:57 PM