Fashion Q&A


  • Stylist Derick Chetty, left, and Fashion editor Bernadette Morra answer your fashion questions every Thursday at noon during the Naked Lunch, with a new topic each week. Send your fashion q's or style points to nakedlunch@thestar.ca.

A & E

  • Rob Salem at fall preview
    Sunday, July 9 12:15 p.m. Welcome to the annual “TV Critic’s Fall Preview,” where the American networks and cable companies pull out all the stops to try to drum up some enthusiasm for their new season product from an increasingly haggard assemblage of major-market print press. Or, as one wag famously dubbed it, “the Bataan Death March with cocktails.” Not that I’m complaining (well, not yet anyway). There are worse ways to spend your mid-summer than three weeks in a luxury hotel with gala, star-studded parties every night. If it weren’t for the round-the-clock press conferences, interviews and screenings, and having to file copy pretty much every day (twice, now that I’m also “blogging”), this would make one helluva vacation. The “TCA tour,” as it also known (for it is hosted, not by the studios and networks, but by the 200-plus members of the Television Critics Association), has returned this year to the Ritz Carlton Huntington resort in immaculately scenic Pasadena, California, where it was housed several years in a row before the membership started shopping around for alternate accommodations. None of which really measured up to the elegant and opulent Ritz – though the retro glamour of last year’s site, the Beverly Hilton, did provide a welcome change, and a convenient proximity to L.A. restaurants and shopping (the cab trip in from Pasadena runs a good $60 bucks each way). On the other hand, there’s not a lot of time to get “off campus” for that sort of thing anyway. In fact, today’s pretty much my only day off – the press sessions don’t really get going till tomorrow, when we start in on an eclectic week of cable programming (Shannen Doherty! Mr. T!), before moving on to the networks, and PBS, and of course our annual TCA awards ceremony. All of which I will duly report on in the daily paper and, more intimately, here. I arrived last night, passed out in the middle of unpacking, and started writing, jet-lagged, at about 6 o’clock (local time) this morning, the second I got my laptop plugged into the hotel high-speed. The second I send this (and tomorrow’s column) off, I’ll get busy checking in with all my L.A. buddies. My old high-school chum, Maurice LaMarche, has some good news. The go-to voice guy in L.A. animation (Pinky and the Brain, Harvey Birdman, The Critic, etc.), he and his cast-mates have just signed their contracts for the return of the cancelled Futurama. Another cartoon star of my long acquaintance, Bill Fagerbakke, is the voice of Spongebob’s Patrick Starfish, best known in live-action as dumb guy Dauber from the sitcom Coach (the first season of which has just come out on DVD). His wife, Toronto actress Catherine McLenahan, tells me he has just opened here at the Geffen Theatre in the new Sam Sheppard play, The God of Hell. Gonna have to take a night off to catch that. Also performing in town this month, my pals The Wet Spots, a deliciously lascivious musical lounge act I wrote a cover story about in What’s On last New Year’s. Yippee – another excuse for a night off-campus. Other L.A. friends will show up here at the tour at some point. Leslie Hope has been busy back in Toronto, shooting her new CW show, Runaway, with Donnie Wahlberg. But they’ll both be here to help launch the show (one of only two new offerings on the melded network’s new lineup) in a few weeks. I gather Tom Cavanagh also has a new show, which he richly deserves after having the very promising Love Monkey yanked out from under him so abruptly last season. Nothing on the schedule yet though. I know that I will hook up with Ike Barenholtz, and his posse from Mad TV, as usual at the Fox network party, and probably continue on into the night on some debauched Entourage-like night on the L.A. comedy scene. Eric McCormack, I know, is busy on stage in New York, returning to his theatrical roots after his stellar run on Will & Grace. Biggest regret: Lucy Lawless, my TCA Awards date now two years running, is busy in Vancouver, repeatedly killing off her reincarnating character on the third season of the fabulous Battlestar Galactica. How the hell am I ever going to be able to top having Xena, Warrior Princess on my arm at this year’s awards ceremony (I wonder if Jolene Blalock is busy?)
  • A & E

« Extreme uniform dressing | Main | Fashion File Host Hunt »

January 18, 2007

Comments

kathy

Oh for god's sake, is nothing sacred?

Brent in Calgary

Bettman and the NHL bigwigs care only about MONEY. If they truly cared about the game they'd leave the jerseys (actually, the correct moniker is sweater) but who's sweating over the name -- its the look, the fit, the feel, the history, the emotional attachment that we as fans have with the sweaters. I hope the NHL players refuse to wear them.

Brent in Calgary

Ryan Pound

Sports teams change jerseys and looks all the time. That’s what I think makes sports uniform fashion so appealing. Although most sporting leagues have regulations surrounding certain specifications on the uniform, for the most part, each team is given the opportunity for different looks, based on a logo, team name or team colour. Giving that uniform (or team), a unique look is something fans can call their own, whether they like the design or not. Just think the last time you turned on a game and were repulsed by the uniforms a particular team is wearing. Then the broadcast shows a wide-angle panning view of the crowd to reveal the same repulsive jerseys peppered throughout the stadium. Why? Because it’s their team. And the uniform they might have had second thoughts about at the start of the season now seems cool, as they see their favourite athletes perform at high levels while donning the teams colours.

So why should we be so alarmed that the NHL is making changes to the classic hockey sweater? Because they are doing it for the wrong reasons, and to be quite frank, lying about it the whole time.

If Gary B. or the League came out to say “We have made a deal for a league-wide change in uniform that will increase league revenues for the next 5 seasons”. There would be resistance at first of course, but with time people would accept the new look, and even the most fickle of fans could grasp the concept of raising league revenues in this post lockout era.

But that’s not what has been expressed to the fans, or at least not to me. The only thing I have heard is statistics about the space aged fabric which won’t hold moisture or sweat, and confusing comments about aerodynamics (aren’t most NHL games played inside these days?). Being a hockey player, none of these topics were ever of concern for me, and I would figure that is the stance most NHLers take in today’s league. (excluding of course, Sidney Crosby or anyone else employed by Reebok.)

So some subtle advice for Mr. Bettman: Canadian hockey fans aren’t as dumb as you seem to think. We know what is going on here, and we will make our voices heard.

Too bad Gary isn’t taking calls from north of the border.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.