A tour of a hurting New Orleans
![]() |
| PHOTOS: BOB FIFE (CTV) AND PETER HARRIS (GLOBAL) |
| Photos show the devastation still felt from Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans's Ward 9. |
For reasons not entirely clear to us, Prime Minister Stephen Harper has not opted to do any public tours of areas of New Orleans still devastated nearly three years after Hurricane Katrina put the city under water.
He did, to be fair, dine with presidents Bush and Calderon this morning at a well-known restaurant called Dooky Chase, not far from a flood-condemned housing project. But as far as we know, no time has been set aside for Harper to do a more expansive viewing of New Orleans.
However, with some help from the logistics crew at the PMO and a local driver recruited to ferry journalists around this summit, several of us went out early this morning to see Ward 9, the worst-hit area, still struggling to rebuild.
Dwayne, our bus driver, is from East New Orleans, a father of six. His house was under 12 feet of water; he had to leave New Orleans and settle temporarily in Mississippi, then Atlanta before returning to rebuild his life and his community. The first thing they rebuilt was the church, he said, and the homes of what he genteely called "the elders."
He took us from our hotel up Canal Street and then we headed east. One of us on this trip, Peter Harris of Global TV, was here for nearly two weeks covering the immediate aftermath of Katrina. He showed us where boats had been parked; he directed our eyes to markings still on houses, showing emergency crews where bodies and gas leaks were.
As we headed into wards 7 and 8, we saw schools and houses still boarded up and abandoned. The water-line marks, some as high as the second storey, are still visible.
Then we headed over the bridge to Ward 9, which is still the site of wreckage and devastation. Dwayne told us that it's a slow process, often involving three levels of bureaucracy. Trailers and temporary homes dot the area.
But it's right near the rebuilt levee where the damage still is staggering. All that's left of once-vital areas are foundations, sidewalks and the occasional porch or fence. Weeds and flowers grow through the cement. It's incredibly quiet.
Dwayne took us down his street, where his home was rebuilt after about six months. He showed us his parents' place just down the street, still abandoned. "Still just gutting it out and cleaning it up," Dwayne explained.
He took us to his rebuilt church, St. Paul the Apostle, a Catholic congregation. "I"m real proud of this church," Dwayne said, hoping to let us in and see it, but it was too early and the place was locked up. Then we went out back to the school, which once had 600 students in 14 classrooms, from kindgergarten through Gr. 12. It's still being rebuilt.
As we were driving back to the hotel after the all-too-brief, 90-minute tour, Reuters reporter David Ljungren, who was the force behind getting this side trip organized, asked Dwayne how the city is mentally adjusting, three years later.
"When it rains still, a lot of kids have trouble," he said. Dwayne explained how even he had a hard time coming back, seeing what had happened to his beloved city. The hardest thing, he said, was to have members of close-knit communities spread out all over the United States in the immediate wake of the damage.
As we neared our hotel, just 10 or 15 blocks from the summit site, we saw a little tent city set up under the Highway 10 overpass; dozens and dozens of little tents. We were told these are people who still haven't found jobs or accommodation after Katrina.
"It does take a toll on you," Dwayne said.
It does indeed. And it's a shame, we agreed, that our Prime Minister didn't get to see all of this while he was here.
Update: As it turns out, Harper did get a tour of the Ninth Ward late today. Canada's ambassador to the U.S., David Wilkins, took the Prime Minister for a brief, 10-minute look around the area, according to PMO spokesperson Dimitri Soudas. Our understanding is that it was added to the PM's agenda late in the day.


I'm not a fan of Prime Minister Harper either, but come on... this post is pretty slanted. I'm not even saying you're pro-one party or anti- the other, I'm saying that this post comes off rather snotty like you are above Harper because you did a 90 minute tour. I like that you posted photos, I like that you told us your personal story. I think those are great observations. But I don't like that you come off sounding like you're better than Harper because you took the tour and he didn't.
Posted by: Riley Hennessey | April 22, 2008 at 12:37 PM
As bad as New Orleans is, Mississippi is worse. I was there last year on a project providing legal assistance to indigent people who had been defrauded by home repair contractors, and was staggered by what I saw. Whereas New Orleans is getting at least some attention, there were whole swaths of the coast that were in serious trouble. We went to some off-the-main road little towns that had basically been forgotten. There were still FEMA parks everywhere (incidentally, these tiny trailers fit families of four).
It was truly depressing to be in allegedly a first world country a year after the Hurricane that looked like it had only happened yesterday. I'd be happy to forward pictures.
Posted by: Dean P | April 22, 2008 at 12:44 PM
I read your post with a saddened heart
The summit is supposed to show how New Orleans is strong and thriving - unfortunately it seems only for show.
I am happy you posted this. It is a shame that our Prime Minister is not taking time out of his schedule to tour the devastated areas. I don't believe its unfairly slanted: it is telling and worth mentioning that he has refused a tour. Most news channels will only focus on the official commentary and events. It's important to have an insider look.
And I do believe Susan and the other reporters get to hold their heads higher today. Good on you guys!
Posted by: Allie | April 22, 2008 at 03:19 PM
There are many reasons that Prime Minister Harper may not have the same set of priorities as you in determining his schedule. Perhaps he simply had the nation's business to attend to? Reviewing the names for a new Supreme Court judge for example?
Posted by: Brian Smith | April 22, 2008 at 04:53 PM
I think it is a bit rich for a journalist to state that a visiting PM. did not take the same tour a journalist did.Did the Mexican PM visit the area? Perhaps not, so what is your point Susan? A PM has more things on his mind than a mere reporter.
Posted by: Jan | April 22, 2008 at 06:56 PM
Presumably to purpose of holding the summit in New Orleans was to show the progress of the recovery. I doubt they just picked the city at random. If it was only about official matters they could have save a lot of trouble and just held it in Washington DC.
The fact that the visiting leaders did not see lack of progress in the most effected areas, suggests that it was a white wash.
Posted by: Darwin O'Connor | April 23, 2008 at 02:54 PM