« Stephen Harper and religion | Main | The currency plunge of information »

May 25, 2010

Chretien as fine art

A little more than six years after he left power, Jean Chretien is back on Parliament Hill to have his official portrait added to the gallery of former prime ministers on the walls of Centre Block. No one wants to miss today's event (except Paul Martin, probably) and  Prime Minister Stephen Harper will be making remarks.

Personally, I'm hoping the  painting  looks a little like this.  20091711photoscanada4

Ah, memories. Here's the CBC video archive of that day. 

But looking at the website of the artist commissioned to do the portrait, Christan Nicholson, we'll probably see something more like this.  Here's how Mr. Nicholson (rather immodestly) describes his work.

With the passing of time I have become recognized as Canada's foremost portrait painter. My training at Mount Allison University was academic, learning from techniques developed during the Italian Renaissance through the Parisian Academy period under the tutelage of Lawren Harris, David Silverberg and E.B.Pulford. This means I completed thousands of hours of figure drawing and painting , learning chiaroscuro to create form, and the structure and proportion of the human body. I was always first in my class and, as a result, was the first person in the history of Mount Allison to graduate with a Bachelor of Fine Arts cum laude. Today, there are few places in North America where the academic tradition is fundamental to a B.F.A. program.

I draw the composition directly on the canvas and begin the oil painting with an underpainting in sepia tones (a brown and cream rendition of the final painting). This is both as an aid and so that raw white canvas does not show through at any stage of the painting. (Many masterpieces are unfinished paintings, but look finished because of the underpainting - for example, Degas' "Portrait of a Lady" at our National Gallery.)

From here my own individual technique and style takes over. I work in glazes, often of pure color in the beginning. From there the painting is worked up in layers of thin oil paint. At a certain point the brush strokes become more evident with final strokes of thicker paint.

I am particularly noted for capturing some aspect of the sitter's personality on canvas. This is innate to myself, and cannot be taught. Just as there is a life-like quality to my work (as if the person is about to speak, or is looking at you or about to walk off the canvas). Everyone comments on this.

My work is considered realistic yet contemporary. The painting's development from drawing to the final thick brush strokes can be seen if the painting is observed closely. There is a luminosity of colour and a striking use of light particular to my own style of portraiture.



TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf8f353ef0134819d2b48970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Chretien as fine art:

Comments


Now having seen the actual picture,I think Mr. Nicholson should have had Chretien holding a copy of the famous Red Book in one hand and a napkin like the one he used to sign away his property in Shawinigan in the other.
Unfortuanately no portrait will ever create an image of Chretien like the famous Shawinigan handshake.
That will remain as Chretien legacy picture.

Paying attention to your astounding post, I locate it is of the extraordinary experience and appropriate suggestions.Trust I will receive what exactly I wish from your current feelings.Good Luck!

The comments to this entry are closed.

Susan Delacourt on Politics


  • Susan Delacourt, the Star's Senior Writer in Ottawa, has covered federal politics for more than two decades as a reporter and bureau chief.