Raptors Blog
By Doug Smith



  • Doug Smith has been covering the Toronto Raptors since their inception in 1995. This is the place to read more of his tales from the hardwood and your chance to talk hoops with our resident expert.

    Click here to submit your Raptors question and Doug Smith will answer a selection in this blog.

del.icio.us

Advertisement


Legal Notice

  • TheStar.com
    Copyright Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. All rights reserved. The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Toronto Star or www.thestar.com. The Star is not responsible for the content or views expressed on external sites. Distribution, transmission or republication of any material is strictly prohibited without the prior written permission of Toronto Star Newspapers Limited.
    For information please contact us using our webmaster form. www.thestar.com online since 1996.

« And here's the second batch | Main | It's called a slump, pure and simple »

March 03, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf8f353ef00e550a7e2888834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Morning After The Night Before, LIV:

Comments

Doug....

Steve Francis was a Grizzly pick. Come on.

You got your head so far up Smitch butt you cant see the truth

Hello Doug

100% agree with you on the Moon experiment being over. Time to give Delfino a shot.

Tell me if you agree with this. I find that Mitchell sticks with his third and fourth quarter line up way too long in games like last night. During the first half he will throw Grahm, Humphries out there and let Rasho play extended minutes. But in the second half he sticks with the same five whether they are stinking up the joint or not. When things are not going there way late, i would like to see a few more chances taken with putting players in. Does this make sense or do most teams not tinker alot during the stretch?

Blogger's note: Most don't tinker, no. MIght make sense to try some other things if the game's getting out of hand. They did use 10 guys in the second half on Sunday.

Hey Doug -

I'm so glad to see you write that Moon as a starter should end. I've felt this way sine December, but always got the impression you thought otherwise. He's a good role player - the type I think every team needs - but off the bench. I have failed to understand his status as a starter. I consistently find myself wondering why he takes so many ill-advised jumpers; cringe when I see him line up a three; and see less and less effort on the defensive end. I like Sam as the coach, but watching the last few games, coupled with Moon's open-ended ticket as a starter, I do think he's costing this team wins.

Just my two cents.

Tree

Technically speaking, you could add one of the great raptors, Alvin Williams, to Rikki C's request

Blogger's note: Alvin was drafted by Portland, never went back. So maybe not

When you build a team of soft players and jumpshooters who cannot defend, rebound, and are unable to get to the paint,except Bosh , here are the results. I cannot blame Sam for this loss. He can't do miracles .Sure we cannot wait next season to make a change in our starting line : maybe is time to start Delfino and Rasho , instead of Moon and Bargs.Few words on Bargs : I like Andrea but the kid has 'zero' personality and, in my opinion, this is the biggest problem, for him and for us.

sara - disagree re. bargs, he has personality, he's just been in a season-long funk (to put it kindly) which has tempered things. think back to last year, when he was consistently putting up good numbers & hitting big shots...he had a nice cold-blooded mercenary type thing going on, he way he carried himself, the way he'd stare down an opposing bench after drilling a deep 3. he's a quiet type anyway, but his on-court personality, when he's going well, is just fine. it just hasn't been going well. but i'll take that over the phony 'fired-up' guy (i'm looking at you, gangsta) any day.

doug - so, you're on side w/ moon coming off the bench. nice. a couple months late, but oh well, not like it'll happen anyway.

Moon may not be a starter but Delfino is hardly a consistent performer. The real problem is that we have no one who can play the position that requires guarding the other teams stud, producing on offence and averaging 7 - 10 rebounds a game. Second chance points against have been a killer all season. It was only a matter of time before we set that record. As long as the 3 point streak is alive, thats the only this we have going for us anymore.

I recall an article on Moon (when he made the team) praising him for winning defensive player of the year in whatever league he played in last season. The article suggested that defense was the big differentiator in his play and what made him able to finally reach the NBA. It is so frustrating to watch him play off shooters

On offense, it hurts to watch him take those horrible 3pt and jumpers. It boggles the mind why he doesn't drive the lane and get fouled. I like Sam but he's got a shorter leash on Bargs that he does on Moon. makes no sense at all.

Technically, Derek Fisher wasn't traded back. He was let out of his contract by the Jazz because of his daughter's health and then he signed with the Lakers as a free agent. Presumeably because they have the specialized care for his daughter in L.A.

Of AB's 10 fouls in the last 2 games, 7 were on a PG/SG/SF going to the basket with no one of our perimeter defencemen closer than 10 ft trying to help.Most breakdowns started with JM,having brain's cramps even on offense.Sam must be convinced that the Rap's present and future is best served by playing JM 27 mn/game and AB 14.Furthermore why Delfino should resign with the Raptors as a back up to Moon?It seems that no matter how bad the rookie plays,he'll be starting.It's time for BC to have a talk with Sam,so the coach "on his own accord"(like the "AB starting again" comedy act), will start Carlos and find a way for JK to earn his $4m/y.

How many players have scored their career high against the Raptors this year? Three guys have done it in the last two games alone. I'm convinced I could get to the hole against these guys. Sure I'd probably miss the shot but I like my chances of getting the rebound.

Your right Doug, Moon should be coming off the bench... i can't seem to fathom why he mostly settles for jumpers, is he ant-contect? Meaning, avoid contact as much as you can?? seems like it.

Brezec is a MAN. He isn't soft like the Raptors. Why the hell is Joey Graham in the game before Primoz? And what is Hump doing? Can someone tell him that he isn't MJ. Enough with the damn jump shots, YOU CAN'T MAKE THEM.

And it's time for Moon to go, He acts like he's a 3 point specialist. But hey, Kapono hasn't taken a 3 in something like 2 weeks.

I'm not as down on Moon as many others. However I think you're right in thinking he shouldn't start if only to spur him on. Sometimes that's what it takes. Any parent knows that if there are no consequences, just constant screaming, the kid will tune out. Sometimes guys play better off the bench because they're trying to prove to the coach that they should start. It's time to give it a try. It certainly couldn't hurt.

Out of all the players, I'd say the last one you should have called out is Primoz whatsisname. If only the other Raps played with his fire last night. It's almost as if you feel that because he won't be around, and you won't have to deal with him, you can rag on him. So many more deserved it more.

How long was Bosh injured for last season? It was a decent stretch of games and the Raptors played great, with essentially the same team. My prediction is that they'll play decent against Orlando just because Orlando is better. I really think they've tanked these last couple of games because they saw the easy schedule and thought easy wins. They need a decent opponent to get their concentration back.

I don't think going big is just to draw a double team in the post. It's to get more rebounds. It's to get some inside shots, whether you're doubled or not. It's to shoot over your opponent when you're outside (like Bargnani would). Bottom line, though, when going small clearly isn't working, try another way.

Finally, I agree completely on your frustration with the hockey highlights. I've never understood that. There is some crossover, sure, but most people watching basketball actually like the sport. If we wanted to watch hockey, we could flip the channel. It's usually somewhere else on the dial. It just makes no sense.

I agree that some adjustments need to be made. It is was as Doug said in a word, despicable. But really, in a 80+ game season aren't you going to have a game here or there where players just don't show up? Even good teams are guilty of this once and a while. For example, anyone remember when the Raps beat the Spurs in San Antonio earlier this season??

Please, please, PLEASE don't compare last night's game to the Raptors beating the Spurs in SA. The fundamental difference is that yes, teams do lay an egg some nights, but that loss wasn't indicative of the Spurs team as a whole. This loss was very much consistent with the way the Raptors have been playing all season, and even if they hit more shots and won the game it wouldn't erase the fact that the Mini-Ballers can rebound better than the Raptors can.


If I remember correctly, wasn't AP praised last season for his man-to-man defense on some of the league's best wingmen? What happened? Is his age becoming a factor?

so, does howard grab 20+ boards next game vs. the raps sans bosh? i'll take the over...

hey doug: games like the fiasco in charlotte are coach-killers, and while i've been somewhat critical of smitch in the past, i hate to put blame on him when NO ONE from the raps seemed overly interested in competing last night. that being said - at what point does that lack of competitiveness/preparedeness, etc. go back to the coach? if his strong suit is 'motivation,' what explanation is there for his guys simply being outworked/outhustled/outplayed? do other teams view the raps as easy pickings defensively, in the paint, on the boards, and get psyched up to play them knowing that if they work hard & hustle on the offensive glass, they'll probably be able to swipe it? the raps just seem to have a laissez-faire attitude going into some games, thinking that they'll be able to shoot their way out of trouble.

Blogger's note: It's 80-20 on the players. They've obviously been given good enough defensive and offensive schemed to win six more than they've lost and beat some good teams in the process. It's easy to take shots at the coach but don't you think he tells them to guard their men on the perimeter, to hit the glass, to box out? Of course he does. Every single day. And on more occasions than not, it works and they win.

I'm sorry, AK. "Game here or there"? This is not an exception for the Raptors, this is the norm! THis team cannot continue to believe its own excuses! 32-0 second chance pts! There is no excuse!

Personally, while I don't have the answer I think this team is in need of something other than a better rotation or more mpg for this guy or whathaveyou! Almost every time we get embarrassed we look to the guys who didn't play as the reason for it! I've seen this team enough to know that there was no one last night- neither on the floor nor the bench- that would've made a difference. This team is probably in need of a makeup adjustment. I don't know if new personnel would be the answer for that but we've pretty much shown why teams with "15 locker room BFF's" don't succeed in pro sports. A little friction is good, if only to make things interesting and keep guys awake!

If I'm tired of anything, it's the apathy the Raptors have shown, win lose or draw! For a team that has no ugly parts, this team's act is pretty ugly. Might even explain why they've failed to improve in any category over the past year. If you never feel any urgency, you will never play with any urgency. Sleepwalking all the time.

And honestly, I'm not just reacting to the Indy/Char games! I've felt this way all year, even after wins. Maybe especially after wins! This team needs some fire or they will never get any better.

Small isn't to blame? That makes ZERO sense Doug.

Just because they're guards are better rebounders, why doesn't it make sense to go bigger?

Yes, they have better rebounding guards and forwards, so...we don't go big to match the rebounding?

No sense.

AK - problem is, they've had stinkers waaaaay too often recently, considering that they're heading into a tougher part of the schedule & gearing up for the playoffs. they really needed to take advantage of the games against the knicks, pacers & 'cats. that's 3 losses that should have been wins. i can't even remember the last time they beat a decent team. had to check the sched, they beat orlando a couple weeks ago, a great game. that's one. before that, they're last 'impressive' win (sorry, i don't count blowing out teams that should be blown out as overly impressive) was the game vs boston in jan. by my count, they have 8 'impressive' wins this year - Nov30 (Cavs), Dec9 (Hou), Dec12 (Dal), Dec28 (SAN), Dec31 (NO), Jan13 (POR), Jan23 (Bos) & Feb20 (ORL). the rest of their wins came against teams that they were clearly better than & should win. on the flipside, they've lost to some pretty horrible teams: bucks, sonics, sixers, wash (twice, once w/o gil, the other w/o gil or butler), clips, knicks, pacers, charlotte. yuck. players 'not showing up' should happen once in a while, not consistently.

agree that moon should be coming off the bench. not only because he seems to have "leveled-off", but he seems to play more energetically and actually go to the bucket (at least without the ball) when ford is on the floor as apposed to calderon. not sure if this is related the different styles of ball the guards play or the offences that sam runs when they are on the floor (or both).

As others have commented more than half of the players listed as traded back to their original teams were instead resigned after being waived.

A few comments on the above:

I remain convinced that most of my fellow Raptor fans get their opinions from reading the opinions of each other. Certainly the opinions are rarely informed by any semblance of fact.

To wit: for all of the blathering about Moon taking "so many ill-advised jumpers", Moon in fact takes very few shots, and very, VERY few threes (the only time he will take more than two a game is when he is hot and should be doing so, as in the Knicks game). His shooting percentage is very respectable as compared to other small forwards. The only way this is even discussed is because it has become part of the Raptor Fan Canon of Received Wisdom. Frankly, it is unsupported.

As for Chris C.'s comment above regarding someone "who can play the position that requires guarding the other teams stud, producing on offence and averaging 7 - 10 rebounds a game" - exactly what fictitious player is this? FYI, here are the top 3 small forward rebounders in the NBA: Lebron with 8.1 rpg, Carmelo with 7.4 rpg, [and neither of those guys guard any "studs"] and - oh my!! - Jamario Moon with 6.2 rpg, in far fewer minutes to boot. And this is not some fancy rebs-per-48-mins or anything, this is actual rebounds secured. Moon is third best at his position, and he does it in 28 minutes per game.

So the Raps had a game where they were manhandled on the boards, and the Received Wisdom of the Raptor Fan says that the 3rd-best rebounding small forward in the league should sit.

Ahem.

One more thing - enough with the hockey nicknames for basketball players, please. I grind my teeth every time I see "Bargs". Of all the things to import from hockey, unimaginative nicknames are the last thing we need.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.