« In appreciation of Parker (Tony, that is) | Main | Some news and notes from the road »

May 23, 2008

Pretty heavy mailbag today

More mail here than you can probably handle and some left out, too. But that’s okay, I’m actually off to cover basketball this weekend – what a concept – so we’ll get back to seven days a week for now and I’ll need some leftover queries to get me through the weekend.

Q: I just finished reading Pistol by Mark Kriegel, a great, great book about a great, great hoops player. It's replaced Miracle of St. Anthony as my favorite basket ball book. Do you have any suggestions of other great books about the game?

Marc S, Toronto

A: We’ve done books a few times and I love how readers chip in with their favourites.

Me? I’d have to put Bill Bradley’s Life On The Run in there, Wayne Embry’s book The Inside Game has to be on that list, as does Hoop Dreams.

The Breaks of the Game by one of the all-time greats, David Halberstam is another and Terry Pluto’s Loose Balls is a hugely entertaining look at the ABA.

You might want to check out The Last Shot, a book about Stephon Marbury and no basketball library would be complete without They Call Me Coach by John Wooden.

There, that should get you through the cottage season, right?

-

Q: (Last) Friday's column mentioned both Lamond Murray and knuckleheads.  Coincidence?  I didn't think so. But it did get me wondering about a new list for you: All time Raptor knuckleheads/difficult players to talk to or interview. Your list can include phonies (eg. guys who smile for the camera but sneer otherwise) but no wives (sorry Jackie & Kendra).

Phil S, Thornhill

A: Not sure if “phonies” is the right word but I always found it a challenge to try to interview Keon Clark, because he somehow figured I’d done him wrong and refused to talk to me for a few months; Oliver Miller would be in that group; and Voshon Lenard was curt and would cut us off after about two questions. But other than that, this franchise really hasn’t ever had that many bad apples, so to speak.

-

Q: This is an out of the blue question, really unrelated to what's going in the playoffs, but I'll ask it anyways:
With Rodman in the news recently (charged with domestic violence, skipping the Pistons' anniversary celebrations), I was thinking about the role he played on the Bulls teams. Yes, he was crazy, but apparently also a bit of a fitness freak. I remember he used to stay in the dressing room or aisle during the first quarter keeping warm on the stationary bike, before he was called on to provide energy, defense and crazy rebounding. My question is, why don't more off the bench energy guys do this to keep warm, especially those who aren't a focal point of the offense and therefore don't need to know what defenses the other team is putting on? I'm thinking Hump in particular here (course he might be stuck on that stationary bike all game).

Tim F, Monterrey, Mexico

A: Some players do, especially ones just coming back from injury but, really, they don’t sit all that long and are generally ready to go when called.

-

Q: A couple of draft-related questions:
1) When can the Raptors start working out potential draft picks?
2) What's the monetary value of a draft pick when it's used to balance out player salaries in a trade?

Sean D, Toronto

A: They can start holding individual workouts right after the Orlando pre-draft camp ends next week. And the monetary value of a first-round pick in a trade is his rookie-scale contract value.

-

Q: Hi Doug, totally unrelated to the Raptors question here.  Since those of us left still watching the playoffs are all in awe over the play of Chris Paul I have a question about where he is in terms of the games greatest 6' and under players?
It's been argued that at least to some point you could say Allen Iverson is the greatest 6' and under player ever in the NBA.  Is Chris Paul (or can he be) better then the young Allen Iverson?
To help you decide i have here their stats from the best years
AI: 31.4 ppg, 4.5 rpg, 5.5 apg, 2.8 spg, and took his team to the finals and won MVP.  Team record for the year was 56-26
CP: 21.1 ppg, 4.5 rpg, 11.6 apg, 2.7 spg, came 2nd in MVP voting and took his team to the "TBD".  Team record for the year was 56-26
I would say at least on some level they're pretty close but which one is bet

Steven T, Winnipeg

A: Well, you’ve got the two there but it’s generally conceded that Isiah Thomas was the best small player ever.

I don’t know if Paul will surpass him but it’ll be fun to watch him try.

-

Q: I've come to the conclusion that you are a very polite Canadian. Why? Because every time I read the blog, and that is daily, I have noticed that somebody uses the word then instead of the word than. If you are a true wordSmith holding your tongue on this obvious error must have caused you to have bitten of a big chunk of your tongue by now.
But I have a legitimate question for you. Towards the end of the season there was some hint that Andrea Bargnani was suffering with an undisclosed issue which may have affected his progress this past season. Do you know if this surgery Andrea has undergone was to correct that?

TC W, Toronto

A: I think the surgery helped a bit, but I also know he was bothered by a sore Achilles, too, which just needed some rest.

-

Q: Two questions. Wouldn't it be cool now that we're 10 years in the organizations life to have a former player be the play by play guy replacing Chuck - jokingly I'd say Charles Oakley or JYD would be the leading candidates. If not them who else?
What former Raps have had the best NBA career? The Dream, Chauncey?

Craig M, Aurora

A: I think you’re getting play-by-play and analyst mixed up, there is no one who’ve ever played here who’d be a good play-by-play guy, I don’t think.

And the best NBA career? A no-brainer.

Hakeem Olajuwon is a first-ballot Hall of Famer without question. Chauncey? Not close.

So … I’d say The Dream for sure.

As for the broadcaster? I'd bet Matt Bonner, when he's done playing, would be pretty good.

Q: Hey Doug, just a basic reporting question for you. If you're interviewing a player and he says something absolutely ridiculous (my mind wanders back to the Oakley days) do you call him on it, or pull your best poker face then scurry away to get it in print?
All the best.

Thomas A, Ottawa

A: Call him on it? Heck, no. Usually the first call is to the office to say, “hey, Oak just said this!”

And then we call our friends to tell them.

Seriously, if we hear something wildly entertaining and off the wall, we smile to ourselves and can’t wait to get back to the machine to type it.

-

Q: For four years us Wisconsin Badger fans were treated to a fantastic young swingman, Alando Tucker. The Suns took him with the 29th pick last year, then buried him at the end of the bench behind Grant and Diaw. He's a great slasher and shooter. He was Big Ten Player of the Year, and beat Michael Findlay's college scoring records. Being from UW he is of course well grounded in Bo Ryan's defense and rebounding. He would be an AP that is a more explosive to the hole. Isn't that what BC is looking for? Wouldn't a guy like that look good and come relatively cheap for the Raptors?

Mark M, Sun Prairie, Wisc.

A: But isn’t he a guy who’d look good and be relatively cheap for the Suns, too? Like when Hill’s no longer there and if they have to deal Diaw? The Suns are money-conscious and I bet they’d like to keep their young assets.

-

Q: Hey Doug, you mentioned in your blog the other day about New Orleans perhaps being interested in getting that Chris Paul fellow some help. I know trade scenarios are simply scenarios but how about Parker or Kapano for Julian Wright? On the surface it looks like New Orleans is getting the better end of the deal but we get a young stud dying for some playing time that is scary athletic, likes to defend, shoots the three well but also drives the ball to the paint (which is a forgotten skill on this team).
Just a thought but what do you think?

Kelsie M, Toronto

A: I’m virtually sure the Hornets are going to keep Wright as a solid piece of their future. Maybe he didn’t get much time in the conference semifinals but he’s a guy they like and want to hang on to.

-

Q: Kind of a left field question, but anyway, do you think Vancouver would be able to support an NBA team now, what with the popularity of Nash and the game in general in Canada? What are the odds the NBA expands again to Canada in the next 10 years? How soon do you think we'll see a Euro-NBA division / conference?

Jerome D, Mississauga

A: Unfortunately, I cannot envision a way the NBA goes back to Vancouver. Odds: I’d say 1,000,000 to 1. At best. Maybe higher.

As for Europe, as soon as there are six new arenas, I’d bet you’ll see a conference over there. Maybe five, seven years.

-

Q: Got a question regarding Redick's situation. How is it wrong to ask for a trade? He is young, but he gets no playing time whatsoever. With two point guards already in Orlando, why not trade him and give him a legit shot with another team? I see him coming off the bench and scoring at least 15 per game.

Dave R, Markham

A: It’s not bad at all to ask in the privacy of a meeting with your agent and the general manager. It diminishes the chance of getting anything in return by making that plea public.

And if J.J. Redick ever averages 15 points a game over an NBA season I will be absolutely stunned.

-

Q: I'm a daily reader of your blog and a comedian friend of your brother Paul.
My question.
Do you have any sense for the process a general manager goes through when shopping a player around, say, like TJ Ford? Does Bryan call specific clubs who he thinks may be interested, or is it more like a mass e-mail to GM's - "We're over stocked and TJ's gotta go!" Or, do GM's typically target specific players they are interested in on other teams and see if they can work out a deal? Or a combination of approaches?
Thanks. Keep up the great work.

Dan L, Winnipeg

A: Ah, another funny guy! Cool.

From what I’ve learned over the years, most conversations between GMs start out in generalities, like “how’s your team? Anything we’ve got interest you?”

And judging how those questions get answered, they’ll move on to more specifics, go away for a day or two to think about things and crunch numbers and then get back together to further explore the possibility of a deal.

-

Q: Hope your enjoying the off season. For the next 4 weeks we will be talking playoffs and draft. In my humble opinion BC has 3 possible routes to take.
1 - he picks at the 17th position
2 - he trades up
3 - he trades down
Given the players in this year's draft what route do you see BC taking.  Or to be more politically correct what would be the pros/cons for each of the 3.

John P, Fredericton

A: I put it at 45-45-10. That is 45-45 he keeps the pick or moves up, and a slight, 10 per cent chance he trades down. And that may be high.

The pros? Moving up will cost him a player on the roster, which isn’t too bad; stay there gives him a choice of a handful of bigs and swingmen he’s got his eye on; trading down saves you some money on the rookie scale contract, but that’s it.

-

Q: Doug, do you think having a 12 man rotation is a liability or an asset?  Wouldn't the Raptors be better to have an eight man rotation with at least 2 Superstars and then 4 guys named Joe, who are great team guys, good in the locker room and future Toronto Star basketball beat reporters?

Ron B, North Vancouver

A: I’m a big proponent of a nine-man rotation, maybe 10 in the regular season and eight, maybe nine in the playoffs.

-

Q: A non-Raptors related question.  With the Bulls landing the first overall pick and the talk being that they will take Beasley, do you think the Bulls will be forced to move one or two of their glut of talented young forwards?  They have Deng, Gooden, Noah, Nocioni, Tyrus Thomas, Aaron Gray, and potentially Beasley.  All those players are either starters or will likely start in the near future.  Do you see them moving any of these pieces, and, if not, will there not be locker-room issues here with so much talent and only a certain number of minutes/game?

J O, North Bay

A: They are absolutely going to be forced to move someone, I would think Thomas might be near the top of the list, then Nocioni. But, it will depend on who they hire as a coach, too, but someone’s got to go.

And don’t automatically think they’ll take Beasley; I can find dozens of NBA types who are dead certain they’re going to take Rose.

-

Q: Doug I read today that both Parker and Bargnani recently had surgery.  What impact if any did the injuries have on their play?

Jim M, Newmarket

A: None, really.

Bargnani’s sinus woes may have hampered his breathing a bit but it didn’t cause the disappearance of his shooting stroke and Parker’s finger was a nagging thing that really had no impact whatsoever on his play.

-

Q: Hey Doug,  just curious how you wrote an article quoting Raptor management as being happy with the lottery results, when you posted in your blog that it wasn't good news for the Raps?
A little confusing.  The way I see it, four of the five most likely trading partners (Chi, Mia, Sea, Ind, NY) for TJ will all have point guards available to take at their draft position without reaching for them, who don't have spine injuries or hefty contracts.  That sounds like a bad news story for the Raps.

S A, Toronto

A: I don’t share quite the same opinion about the results of the draft lottery as some people in the Raptors front office do. That’s not unusual.

-

Q: Hi Doug. Enjoy reading your Raptors blog. Now on to a big debate in the household which does not involve the wife. My two young boys have so far grown up watching LeBron and Kobe Bryant. Their dear old dad remembers the Larry Bird era and I can be heard telling my boys Bird was the bestest. Pardon my English. Doug, it is hard to compare but do you think the 21st century players like LeBron and Kobe are better than the likes of Magic, Jordan and Dr. J. I think Bird could take Kobe on a one-on-one. Your thoughts please. Thanks for settling the debate or at least agreeing with me.

Deepak J, Markham

A: As a guy who just hit the half century mark officially this week, I'm all for walks down memory lane.

I think they are better athletes but not better players, if you know what I mean.

I would Kobe in his prime might give Larry in his prime a run for his money in a one-on-one game but in a shooting game? Bird wins nine times out of 10.

-

Q: Hi Doug, was reading the blog today and saw what you wrote about Timmy D protesting fouls. If you had to nominate 3 (or more) NBA players for a "Who Me?" award, who would they be? Rasheed, Duncan and LeBron are coming to my mind.

Amanda F, Barrie

A: Oh, I think you’ve got to have Manu in there. And He Who Shall Not Be Named comes quickly to mind, too. Oh, and I’m pretty sure Sam Cassell, when he could play, would be in the discussion. But I like your list as a jumping off point.

Of course, Dikembe is the gold standard.

-

Q: Who's a bigger disaster as an organization, but more likely to turn it around and win a championship? The Knicks or the Leaves?

Mike S, Georgetown

A: Apples and oranges but what the heck.

The Knicks actually have a general manager who’ll be the general manager, they have a coach and a high draft pick. Oh and, it seems, a clue.

You can say none of that for the hockey team.

'Nuff said.

-

Q: Hey Doug, if the Lakers win it all this year, do we start thinking about mentioning Kobe in the same sentence as MJ. I know he hasn't accomplished nearly as much (yet), but he's still shy of 30 years old. He won't retire with as many MVPs and may not win 6 rings, but he takes over a game and wills his team to victory, therefore has the same resonant effect as MJ. Also, if you had to nominate one active player who maybe has a shot to go down as the best ever, who do you think that might be? Love your work, by the way.

Geoff A, Toronto

A: It will be Kobe’s fourth championship since 2000, the first one he’s accomplished sans Shaq. He’s the MVP, the singularly most gifted player in the league. Yes, he is in the same sentence and the conversation if he wins another championship.

And if he gets his fourth ring this year, why wouldn’t he have a legitimate shot to eventually get six? It’s not like this group of Lakers is near the end of its run.

-

Q: I am curious about Jorge Garbajosa... Will he play next year? How well can we expect him to play? Would any team be interested in acquiring him - 1yr at $4,000,000 seems a reasonable risk for a team to take on the guy... especially if he's packaged with Calderon for saaay Miami's #2, Joel Anthony and ???
Bram E, Toronto

A: Hang on sec.

You’re thinking of proposing Jose Calderon and a guy who won’t have played NBA basketball in 18 months for the second pick in the draft, a young kid making no money and something else? You’re not serious.

You can expect nothing from Garbo next year until you see him play full speed in the fall. No one has any expectations at the moment.

-

Q: I've read speculation on the Internet that teams like the Knicks and Heat may be willing to part with some of their good young players (David Lee, Balkman, Robinson etc.) and/or first round draft picks if a team also agrees to take some of their brutal contracts off their hands (i.e. Zach Randolph, Eddy Curry, Jerome James, Mark Blount, Marcus Banks etc.)
Now, let's pretend you are the GM of an NBA team (like say, for example, the Raptors). Would you be willing to make a trade where you could pick up a very good young player or high draft pick in exchange for some expiring contracts and maybe a decent young player or late first round pick if it meant also having to take on a brutal contract/personality to make it happen?
Serge P, Ottawa

A: It would depend on the brutality of the contract and the personality. But if you’re asking whether I would assume the contracts and personalities of Zach Randolph and/or Eddy Curry, the answer is a resounding no.

Not only wouldn’t they fit on this team, they would hamstring you financially from making significant moves for years.

No way, no how.

Now, Mark Blount’s contract isn’t that bad – it actually goes down in 2009-10 from 2008-09 ($8.5 million to $7.9 million). And Marcus Banks never makes more than $4.8 million a year so that’s not a horrible price to pay, being less than the average salary.

-

Q: Hey Doug, Ian Thomsen from SI says the Italian in the draft (Danilo Gallinari, I believe), 'is a better prospect that Andrea Bargnani'?  Could this be possible?

Jeremy W, Uxbridge

A: Absolutely possible, I’ve been hearing the same thing for a year.

-

Q: It appears as if Nicolas Batum will be available when the Raptors select. My question (1) Why is he not projected to go higher? (2) Why am I not hearing his name as a possibility for Toronto? I just think it would be a huge mistake not to take this guy (aka similar to not taking Andre Iguodala few years back)

Kandeephan G, Markham

A: You have heard his name here if you’ve been reading this space or the paper of late.

And from what I hear from scouts at the moment, it’s doubtful he’ll be available at No. 17 but if he is, Toronto will take a long look at him.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf8f353ef00e552900d268834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Pretty heavy mailbag today:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Since when is the monetary value of a draft pick in a trade more than zero? A player only assumes a monetary value in a trade when he is signed to a contract but a future pick has no monetary value in a trade. A team can even draft a player, and so long as they haven't signed him to a contract, I believe they can assign his rights to another team in a trade and those rights have no monetary value. A future draft pick included in a trade will usually balance out talent or value, not money.

Blogger's note: You'll see the explanation in other posts, thanks. It has monetary value only once the selection is made, and then a "cap hold" (100 per cent of the rookie scale) is in effect.

Doug, the Last Shot is cool, Loose Balls is a personal fave, but :07 Seconds or Less might be the most entertaining, followed by "The Rivalry", about Bill Russell and Wilt Chamberlain's epic relationship.

My two cents.

Blogger's note: An exellent choice indeed.

My guess is that Vancouver won't get another franchise, either. But what are your reasons for thinking that? If a billionaire wanted to buy a team for Vancouver, or a current owner wanted to move here, would the league still say no?

Blogger's note: I don't think they'd say "no" but they would likely try to convince him to look at other markets. But if a billionaire was bound and determined to put a team in Vancouver, I presume the league would gladly take his billions.
The reason I don't think it'll come back is that there are other markets -- including Europe -- the league would want to look at. Not that they would be better, but they would probably want to explore elsewhere.

Kobe is the best player in the world today but he is no Jordan. Let's compare.

Kobe:
3 rings
1 MVP
2 scoring titles
6 1st team all-defensive (IMO he is better than Bowen)
45.3% career fg

MJ:
6 rings
6 finals MVPs
5 MVPs
10 scoring titles
All-time career PPG leader (30.1)
All-time career playoff PPG leader (33.4!!!)
Record 9 1st team all-defensive
49.7% career fg

Kobe's great but he has to do a little more than win another championship to start getting mentioned in the same sentance as Jordan.

Just to inform, I think it's a little bit of stretch to describe 'The Last Shot' by Darcy Frey as 'a book about Stephon Marbury.' That's how it was marketed in its latest printing (2004), but those who read it will see that Marbury is just one of four central characters (and perhaps the least interesting)in this beautifully written book that uses basketball as a vehicle to talk about much more.

Blogger's note: A stretch? Yes. No doubt. But if someone's looking for an NBA "hook" the role Marbury played may make a casual NBA fan pick it up.

not to harp too much on the euro style of bball, but vujacic admitted that in europe they rarely play or practice defense at all. in a league where defense is held to a high standard, doesn't it mean that the learning curve for a euro player to adjust to the nba game about 2-3 years? with that said, even though i hated the pick, i'm hoping that bargns will improve next year. a big rotation of bargns, bosh and either haslem or wilcox will do the raps well.

it's funny, people focus on the pg position and the bigs who are easier for the raps to get than top class wing men. getting a wing like maggette may not be enough for the raps to stay in the top 8 next year. i only think kapono and maybe moon is worth keeping as bench players. the raps need a defensive oriented sf and a scoring wing. keeping calderone will make us weaker defensively, that defensive sf will be very important to get. my vote surprisingly is that euro from the jazz, kirilenko. sloan and jazz fans will be happy to get rid of him.

big things are needed of course to stave off njn, miami and indy. chitown will also be good if they choose rose. choosing beasley will do nothing for the team that lacks leadership that they will eventually get from rose.

Doug,

I think you're mistaken with respect to the value of a draft pick in a trade. The value of a future pic is $0 - not the rookie scale - regardless of whether it is a first or second round pick. Only once a draftee signs a contract does he have a 'trade value'.

http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm#71

Blogger's note: Yes, you are right. I didn't explain it well at all. Thanks

Hey

For the Jordan and Kobe question.....I think Michael Jordan is by far one of the top all time greats in the NBA I'd say anywhere in the 1-3 range. But what won him championships has way more to do with the players around him that made him a superstar. I'm not sure if you should even consider championships when talking of great players. Cause there aint no way Lebron's gonna win championships with the crew he's got around him and Robert Horry would be one of the greatest players of all time.

Play by Play guy, you forgot Jalen Rose. He's doing some ESPN now, but he is quick witted. Great 1 liners and has a very good knowledge of the game. He'd give thoughtful insites. May not be Jack Armstrong level who is by far the best analyst around these parts.

Cannot get enought news on the Raptors.
Your blog helps. Why isn't there more coverage on the Raptors?
News like what each Raptor is doing at the moment, over the summer.
Who will be back and who will be gone? Raptors TV helps as well but it is more about other teams. Sorry but I miss the Raptors.
Chuck will be missed but I hope they bring back the coach Mr. Armstrong

Doug, you mentioned in one of your answers that the value of a pick is the equivalent its rookie scale contract value. I was wondering how they determine the value of a pick when it has yet to be determined where that pick will be in the draft order. Like, for example, if the Raptors were to trade their 2010 first rounder, how would the value of that pick be determined for salary matching purposes?

Thanks

Blogger's note: I was wrong, or at least didn't explain it very well. See a post a couple below this.

I am no fan of Curry,but if he would be the price to pay to bring Gallinari to the Raps,in exchange for Rasho ,17th pick and Joey G.,i would make the trade. The rotation at 4/5 would be better and more diversified with Curry than with Rasho: it would give more space to manouvre to CB4,and more time to Bargnani to get better at the 5'.
If Gallinari is good as they say, there is no need to sign Delfino, foccusing instead to trade one of the Pg and AP for a better shooting guard.
I think also that Garbo will help at the 4/5,after all he hurt his foot,not his basketball IQ.
My question is: would BC hesitate to bring to TO another italian,after so many fan sort of soured on Andrea?

Blogger's note: If Bryan thought another Italian-born player was the right choice, it wouldn't matter to him, I don't think, what had happened in the past.

Given the column, blog, and mailbag this week I will now be accepting apologies from everyone who freaked out last week when I suggested a Ford and Nesterovic for Haslem and Blount trade was a reasonable exchange for both the Raptors and Heat.

The line forms here:

Another must read: The Pivotal Season: How the 1971-1972 Los Angeles Lakers Changed the NBA

I read that book in a week. I don't really like the Lakers, but they have a rich history.

Check it out everybody!

Jay - its going to be a pretty short line.

You would think they would use what trading chips they have to address their need for a wing player or a big rebounder to alleviate the stress on bosh. If Haslem is on the court with Bosh, CB is playing C again and taking a pounding. Its not that I don't like Haslem, its that they should be looking elsewhere first to address bigger areas of weakness when trading their assets.

Jay, Haslem and Blount for TJ and Rasho is a crazy deal. There is no way whatsoever that Colangelo makes that trade.

RS, it was not unusual for haslem to cover bigs when paired to help minimize shaq from fouls. haslem is a good post defender and solid rebounder. the trio of haslem, bosh and bargnani would be solid in the east or west. bosh and bargns with wilcox would be good. the fact is, the raps needs an athletic big with size who can defend the post, get rebounds and run the floor - aka, the anti-bargnani.

Doug, if Toronto is going to trade with Miami, why not Rasho and T.J for Marion. Moneywise it should work and Marion is a real talent. i am aware that he can opt out, but it is highly unlikey that he will leave all that money on the table.

Not saying that Haslem is not a decent player. I'd definitely want him as a rotation player on any given team. However, I just think that the Raps could probably get more for TJ and Rasho than that deal. If we make the Haslem trade, who starts? Haslem at 4 and Bosh at 5? If so then we are undersized at both positions. If Haslem is coming off the bench, then we traded TJ and Rasho and didn't get a starter back. Seems weak to me.

Aiyo, as far as I can remember I 'm pretty sure Rafer Alston and Mike James were some some "knuclheads", and I'm gonna tell you right now those guys could not have been easy to interview.
But seriously Doug, RAPTOR land needs to know something, are the RAPS going to be a playoff contender in the next 3 years?
Come Dougie, we need your full HONESTY!!
Marc, Scarborough

Blogger's note: Playoff contenders? As in contending for a top eight spot? Sure they are.

He Doug,
Just wondering a couple things:
a)what in your opinion is the "best case" scenario come mid August?(for the RAPTORS, and the state of the franchise)
b)of the free agents we have right now who are the best 2 available minus Jose?
I read your blog everyday, I haven't gotten a response yet, and am looking forward,
Marc, Scarborough

Blogger's note: Best-case scenario? They've traded one of the points (I would suggest Ford) in a package that gets them an athletic starting small forward, they've drafted a young big and spent the mid-level exception on a defensive-minded wing.
Best free agents? Around the league? Let's wait to see who opts out of their contracts before we do that, okay?

We already have 2 haslem-type alternatives as of next season - Moon and Garbo. Talented enough player but only fits on a handful of teams. Go get a Wilcox or as good of a deal on a young-ish center as you can get or just trade up or take a good young defensive center in the draft (their are many solid bigs at 17)

"The Last Shot" is a great story of poverty, basketball and the plight of escaping the ghetto. For it's time, "The Jordan Rules" by Sam Smith was a great read, and so was Charles Barkley's autobiography, in which he claims he was misquoted. Got to give Charles credit recently, though--he said the Lakers would come back in game one and they did, and he said the Spurs were going to get blown out last night and they were.

As far as the Raps off-season, I think trading for more draft picks is the smartest way to go. Wilcox and Haslem are interesting, but what if there was a way to select Kevin Love, Danillo Gallinari or Donte Green? You could conceivably come out of the draft with an NBA-ready big man and a slasher like CDR or this kid from France, Batum. It's a good, deep draft and there's quality there.

Re: books about hoops....

If you want a good read, check out "Can I Keep My Jersey?" by Paul Shirley.

It's a pretty funny look at what it's like to bounce around the minor leagues of basketball (and be the 12th man on the Suns during the Bryan Colangelo era!) Great book by a basketball player who doesn't like basketball players.

i read earlier in the week about the protesting of fouls. meant to post then (or is it than?), just kidding!
the all time worst, i almost typed greatest, but really this is nothing to brag about, has got to be vlade divac. i can't imagine how many times the whistle blew and he was already throwing his hands up and putting on his pleading face, before he realized the call was nothing to do with him......an official's time-out? vlade would practically be on his knees begging for an appeal.
used to crack me up/drive me crazy. add him to the hall of no shame list, doug.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Doug Smith's Sports Blog


  • Doug Smith has been a sportswriter for more than 30 years, a journey that's included seven Olympic Games, numerous and varied championships and more dreary regular season games than he'd care to remember. Here, he'll talk about them all, as well as current events and pop culture. (Just don’t ask him about music nowadays — it's not his cup of tea).