Raptors Blog
By Doug Smith



  • Doug Smith has been covering the Toronto Raptors since their inception in 1995. This is the place to read more of his tales from the hardwood and your chance to talk hoops with our resident expert.

    Click here to submit your Raptors question and Doug Smith will answer a selection in this blog.

del.icio.us

Advertisement


Legal Notice

  • TheStar.com
    Copyright Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. All rights reserved. The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Toronto Star or www.thestar.com. The Star is not responsible for the content or views expressed on external sites. Distribution, transmission or republication of any material is strictly prohibited without the prior written permission of Toronto Star Newspapers Limited.
    For information please contact us using our webmaster form. www.thestar.com online since 1996.

« Manu's the Man and the series has some juice | Main | Of reunions and non-calls »

May 27, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf8f353ef00e55299f9cd8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ugly game but that's how they like it:

Comments

hey doug, what do you forsee in the future of kwame brown now that his contract is up? he is a career 8/6 player and pjax states he is very good defensively. at 26 years of age and in extremely good shape, he can be a steal @ 3 yrs/$10m. can you see any team trying to pick him up at all?

Blogger's note: Oh yeah, he's a 26-year-old 7-footer. He's going to get that at least. And he may never be an all-star but he's going to be in someone's rotation for a few years yet, I think.

Doug, I've been thinking about this draft a lot lately (like everyone else, apparently), and I thought I would take a look at the list of interesting candidates you included in your other article today.

Nicolas Batum, 6-foot-8 SF, France
(Long, athletic but unpolished; solid defensive potential)
I'm afraid of this pick. I've seen way too many guys with this description come in and never reach their "potential". He has a rep as not being a hard worker and lacking in game intensity. That's the kind of stuff that rarely develops in a player. Skills you can teach; mindset you can't.

Chris Douglas-Roberts, 6-7 SF-SG, Memphis
(Good finisher with either hand; can get to the rim)
I've been against this pick since the NCAA tournament, but I'm starting to come around again. He can produce immediately, and looks like a possible Rip Hamilton type player. Rip didn't look like he'd become what he has when he came out of college, and CDR is a superior physical specimen to Rip, so I could live with this one.

Brandon Rush, 6-7 SF-SG, Kansas
(Good scorer, but needs to improve defensively)
Similar to above, I didn't see a whole lot to love in the tournament, but his defensive skills *are* impressive, and I'm wavering now. I don't think he'd be the BPA at 17, though.

Joe Alexander, 6-8 SF-PF, West Virginia
(Unpolished offensive threat seen as more of a project)
I completely disagree re: project -- he's more than adequate from 15 feet in already. I love this pick, but I think he'll be gone at 17. His athleticism is ridiculous, and he's already a prolific producer scoring and on the boards. Question today is whether he can handle well enough to play SF. If he can, he'll be dangerous because he can get up so high on his jump shot and can dunk over people on the drive.

Chase Budinger, 6-7 SG-SF, Arizona
(Smooth shooter comfortable coming off screens or spotting up)
Just not interested. I think his best case is Matt Harpring. I like Harpring, but not at 17.

BIGS

Darrell Arthur, 6-9 PF, Kansas
(Not a good rebounder, but a solid-scoring big man)
Ugh. My feeling is, if we go big, it's gotta be a true C. We have a franchise PF in Bosh, and backup PFs are really not that hard to come by. And we especially don't need another non-rebounding big.

JaVale McGee, 7-0 C Nevada
(Raw, raw project. Years away from being a major contributor)
Totally agree with this assessment. The potential is pretty nice, though. I think I read he has a 7'-6" wingspan... He could turn out to be a Stoudemire-type player, but he could also turn in Kwame Brown. High risk.

Marreese Speights, 6-10 PF-C, Florida
(Best attribute is his back-to-the-basket offensive game)
Intriguing, but I think he's a ways off from being ready, honestly. After watching the Abunussar camp tape, Alexander looked way more polished. I know that's not a ton to go on, but he kinda looked like best-case Bosh, and as noted above, we already have one of those.

Roy Hibbert, 7-2 C, Georgetown
(Not particularly mobile for a big man, but lauded for work ethic)
I'm so not enamoured by his level of athleticism, but I think he has the most NBA-ready game of all these big men, and realistically would probably help the Raps the most in the short term. I think he would indeed allow Colangelo to move Rasho, as I think he can play backup C today. From a fan's perspective, it would seem disappointing to take an "old reliable" instead of an exciting prospect, but he might be the best choice for management.

Alexis Ajinka, 7-0 C, France
(More a mid-range shooter than low-post presence; another project)
They're saying a 7'-9" wingspan??? Is that possible? I haven't seen anything from this guy, so I have no idea. He is long. Seems maybe too skinny for Toronto's purposes, though. He's put on 35 lbs in 2 years, and still has about 20-30 to go. His frame looks about maxed out to me.

I had no idea that Kevin Lowe was making a pro sports comeback in the NBA. Good on him. Completely unrelated, whatever happened to that big kid from UCLA people seemed to love so much? Don't hear much about him these days...

Blogger's note: I believe he's playing hockey somewhere.

If I'm remembering correctly, the Lakers were doubling up on Duncan in game 1 and it worked well, then switched to single coverage. Think they'll go back to double teaming tonight?

Blogger's note: They better.

Looking forward to the McDyess article. He's been the Pistons best player by far in the Boston series. It's nice to seem him assert himself in a far greater manner than his previous Pistons "role player" status demanded. He's always been the other guy- the only starter not there for the title- and I think that's made him a little apprehensive to step forward. It would be an amazing story if he becomes the Pistons leader that's clearly been lacking in this playoff run. No excuses indeed.

Doug,

Like everyone else, I'm led to believe that Jose Calderon will be a BYC asset upon signing an extension. However, when would that take effect?

TJ Ford signed his contract extension in 2006, as you recall, but he didn't become BYC until 2007- because that's when the extension kicked in (he had to play 2006/2007 under his rookie deal).

Now, I'm not sure what Jose's contract stipulates because it's not your common first-round deal, but as a restricted free agent, would that not imply that he has at least one more year to play out on his old deal before his extension kicks in? And if so, should all the talk about him becoming a BYC player not be put on hold for a year?

Thanks,
Eric

Blogger's note: No, Jose is a base-year compensation guy this year. The difference was that T.J. signed an extension of his rookie scale contract, which is allowable under the CBA. Jose had a three-year deal as an undrafted free agent and had no chance to sign an early extension.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.