A thankless, tough job that someone has to do
Wondered when the first “anonymous source” story about rifts in the NBA Players Association would really break and how they’d handle it.
Happened on the week, some column says some players think Derek Fisher’s too sympathetic and friendly with David Stern and the owners, it suggests there is a conflict between Fisher and Billy Hunter and Fisher lashed out with this letter to the players that a handful of media outlets got their mitts on yesterday afternoon.
No real surprise in it – it’d be a far better story if Fisher said, “yes, I (Heart) David and I want a deal now” – but it was the story on an otherwise slow day.
(And until they decide to meet again and guys like Ken Berger and Howard Beck and Steve Aschburner and Brian Mahoney can keep us wildly entertained with Tweets From The Lockout Lobby, slow is going to be the order of the day).
But I tell you what, I wouldn’t want Fisher’s job for almost anything in the world.
With the disparate personalities in his union, some with unimaginable wealth, others with unimaginable personal issues and backgrounds, the balancing act he has to strike must be incredible.
I am sure he’s hearing from players and their agents who want a settlement and want it now, people who are quite willing to take the financial package that’s on the table and get on with their often brief professional sports careers.
And I know there are hard-liners who want to give back nothing and who would be urging him to keep the union out as long as is necessary to maintain what they have now.
That would strike me as quite different from the job of a regular union leader; as we’ve pointed out in the past, this is not an employer-employee dispute in the normal scheme of things, there are factions on each side that make it, as a friend says, like herding cats to keep everyone in line.
That he’s done it so far is nothing short of amazing to me, there seem to be far fewer public rifts this time than there were in 1998 and 1999 and that’s to the credit of Fisher and Hunter.
Now, if they’d just find a way to get this thing over and done with, we could really laud them.
-
This is kind of topical, given the dearth of sports for my little mind to get around:
Q: Hey Doug: You've obviously been a grunt for more than just basketball (especially this summer!). So, how about two lists - they don't have to be long. In descending order, what sports events do you feel most 'comfortable' with? (If you want, you don't have to limit it to sports, if want to include, say, fashion shows.) Then, what events did you cover that you enjoyed the most?
Thanks for keeping us entertained during the lack of basketball - even if some, apparently, don't like you to veer 'off the beaten path.' The majority obviously enjoy it!
Tim H, Windsor
A: Took some time to come up with these but, luckily, time is something I have.
Let’s stick to just sports, we all know fashion is hardly my forte, the music is mostly old and stuff I just like for no specific reason and, well, that’s about it.
Comfort Level
Hockey
Yeah, I know. Un-Canadian of me. It’s not that I don’t like the sport – although I still say scripted fights are the most ridiculous thing in the world and prove nothing – it’s that I don’t possess a great depth of knowledge.
And I do like how easy it is to tweak the passion of fans.
Football
Takes a while to get back into the swing of things but it’s pretty easily done.
Olympic sports
Great stories, great drama. Hugely fun.
Baseball
Wrote it. Like it. Probably the only other sports beat I’d think about but it’s a long summer to give up.
Basketball
If for no other reason than the time I’ve put in during the last decade and a half. Besides, it’s a brilliant game of near-constant motion and at least one ‘Holy Crap’ moment a night.
But you know what?
Good sports writing is more about telling stories about people, narratives about games, being entertaining while also being informative. So, really, you should be able to plop any of us down anywhere, gives us some time with a guy or a team and we’d give you something interesting.
Now, can you give me a day or two to come up with top events? We need to parcel good things out piecemeal around here these days.
-
How the hell did it get to be Nov. 1?
Can’t wait for the Christmas sales to start.
Today’s Opening Night.
Dallas-Chicago.
Thunder-Lakers
Jazz-Spurs.
Damn.
-
So Tony LaRussa’s retired?
Bet he didn’t try to phone in his resignation.
Anyway, not sure where I’d place him on the list of modern era great managers because the two things that come quickly to mind with him are how he managed a team with Mark McGuire and Jose Canseco and never once seemed to twig to the, um, pharmaceutical nature of their accomplishments.
And there always seemed to be some sort of, I dunno, condescending nature to him. As if he was the smartest guy in the room in his opinion and he wanted to subtly let you know that. Kind of what I feel about Phil Jackson except that Jackson tended to win an awful lot of championships.
So give LaRussa his due for hanging around the game for a very long time; don’t put him in the pantheon of greats quite yet.
-
Know what stinks?
Having a Super Son who gives up going out for Halloween so you can’t reap the benefits of the stuff he doesn’t like and getting more kids than expected so there’s not much stuff left in the bowl and a night of couch and candy ends quickly.
Just sayin’.
-

Hi, Doug,
Re Derek Fisher: Speaking from experience on a union executive, he does have a tough job, but it's not that much different from other union leaders. Any decent ie non-corrupt, union rarely has unanimity. Even if there is near-unanimity, there are disaffected members. Their opinions can range from one-issue disputes to "we should just do everything the bosses tell us to do". All these things have to be balanced.
The main differences are that his membership is MUCH richer than any other union, and their comments are much more public.
Cheers,
Dave
Posted by: Dave Fritz, Kingston | November 01, 2011 at 09:10 AM
72 days and Hump and Kim call it quits?? They're rookies.
Posted by: MickeyRoonie | November 01, 2011 at 09:34 AM
Saw highlights of the Tony LaRussa retirement. I always thought his hair would come off with his ball cap, huh.
-
I can think of 3-4 million reasons to take Fisher's job. That is, as long as I get his BRI!
Posted by: Nick M | November 01, 2011 at 11:05 AM
Think Odom and Hump are still tight?
Posted by: Craig | November 01, 2011 at 12:39 PM
@Craig. Hilarious! Funniest thing I've read all day.
Posted by: Jeff D | November 01, 2011 at 02:06 PM
Hey Doug!
Now, I've got some Hallowe'en treats that were left over from last night (including some chocolate bars; it's not just suckers and gum crap you save for the old kids who don't dress up). Say I were to express post them to you care of The Sports Department at The Star, do you think you'd get them??? Cheers!
Blogger's note: Not a chance they ever get to my desk :)
Posted by: Lorie | November 01, 2011 at 03:10 PM
"Today’s Opening Night.
Dallas-Chicago.
Thunder-Lakers
Jazz-Spurs."
Prediction on the Spurs game, Doug?
Blogger's note: Well played.
Posted by: Tim H. | November 01, 2011 at 03:39 PM
also it should be noted (in the fair and balanced reporting doctrine) that Arison the owner of the Heat was fined $500,000 smackers for making "controversial tweets about other owners and there actions" here is a example..A fan sent the Heat owner a heated message, and Arison responded to the fan, telling him, "You are barking at the wrong owner." ...so there is animosity brewing on that side as well, here is the full article....
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=ycn-10342277
Posted by: doug | November 01, 2011 at 05:39 PM
"controversial tweets about other owners and there actions"
I can't find this quote in the link yoy posted.
"THERE actions" really!
Posted by: m | November 01, 2011 at 08:30 PM
@m....so shoot me exact quote just so your happy is "controversial comments"...how's that...unreal.....go get a life...really///
Posted by: doug | November 01, 2011 at 10:04 PM