Kate's baby is on the way, magazine reports
Those "royal sources" are at it again, leaking news that Kate Middleton is with child. Has been, in fact, for six weeks.
This comes from In Touch magazine, which is the same publication that breathlessly reported six months ago that Kate can't get pregnant, according to a "royal doctor."
Nevertheless, it insists this insider has it right, having already correctly naming the couple's secret honeymoon destination back in May.
Skepticism over these persistent pregnancy rumours is as rampant as the rumours themselves, which have spiked since Kate started holding her stomach on a tour stop in Denmark a few weeks ago.
This time, In Touch backs up its report with details like the potential name -- "Edward, Philip and Michael are likely choices for a boy, or Alice or Rose for a girl" -- and that three nurseries are being readyed for the royal arrival -- one in Nottingham Cottage where they stay in London, another at their farmhouse in Wales and a third as part of the future home at Kensington Palace.
The New York Daily News found the couple's press secretary for comment: "We never confirm or deny these rumours. This is about the millionth(pregnancy) report we've had. If it were true, you'd hear the announcement from us and not a gossip magazine in the U.S.," said Miguel Head.

Somehow, I doubt it. Kate is far too thin. If your body doesn't think you can feed yourself, why would it let you get pregnant to feed TWO? I get the feeling - and right now, it's just a feeling - that Kate will want to stay thin but get pregnant. When she can't, they will resort to IVF treatments, and once she IS pregnant, that will keep the media off of her back for gaining weight.
Posted by: mandysroyalty | 11/18/2011 at 06:33 AM
I think this is not necessary that kat's baby name will be a royal name, even she can choose as trendy name also.
Posted by: Trendy baby boy name | 08/31/2012 at 03:24 AM