Comments on Princess Diana photo — 'not to be published' — shrouded in mysteryTypePad2013-01-04T18:01:54ZToronto Starhttps://thestar.blogs.com/royals/tag:typepad.com,2003:https://thestar.blogs.com/royals/2013/01/princess-diana-photo-not-to-be-published-shrouded-in-mystery/comments/atom.xml/Shawna Lillo commented on 'Princess Diana photo — 'not to be published' — shrouded in mystery'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341bf8f353ef017d4027b7bf970c2013-01-18T17:55:05Z2013-01-18T19:45:27ZShawna Lillohttp://peraiutare.com/Look at the guy, he looked like little Harry’s twin brother! If that isn’t Harry’s father, I am Elton John’s...<p>Look at the guy, he looked like little Harry’s twin brother! If that isn’t Harry’s father, I am Elton John’s pony. That must be a photo of when Harry was conceived. This is a true gem to have been witnessed.</p>picklestick commented on 'Princess Diana photo — 'not to be published' — shrouded in mystery'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341bf8f353ef017d3f8538a1970c2013-01-05T15:44:16Z2013-01-05T19:54:54ZpicklestickI wonder if she ever wished she'd stayed with this boy instead...<p>I wonder if she ever wished she'd stayed with this boy instead...</p>Sailor commented on 'Princess Diana photo — 'not to be published' — shrouded in mystery'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341bf8f353ef017ee6f96565970d2013-01-05T15:07:18Z2013-01-05T19:54:54ZSailor"publishing an earlier story about a secret romantic rendezvous between Charles and Diana on the royal train." Turns out the...<p>"publishing an earlier story about a secret romantic rendezvous between Charles and Diana on the royal train."<br />
Turns out the romantic interlude was true , but it was between Charles and Camilla !!</p>victoria gneo commented on 'Princess Diana photo — 'not to be published' — shrouded in mystery'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341bf8f353ef017d3f84ee2c970c2013-01-05T15:00:21Z2013-01-05T19:54:54Zvictoria gneouh oh<p>uh oh</p>Grandma Roses commented on 'Princess Diana photo — 'not to be published' — shrouded in mystery'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341bf8f353ef017d3f84473b970c2013-01-05T12:48:08Z2013-01-05T13:54:02ZGrandma RosesIt looks like it might be her brother, who is younger than she is. He appears to be reading a...<p>It looks like it might be her brother, who is younger than she is. He appears to be reading a book. Perhaps the 'Do not publish' remark is due to the casual, dare I say, undignified posture of someone who might become queen one day.</p>ntomyng commented on 'Princess Diana photo — 'not to be published' — shrouded in mystery'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341bf8f353ef017c355159b2970b2013-01-05T01:33:56Z2013-01-05T02:11:29ZntomyngIt the paper really "never" intended for the picture to be published I suspect they could have put a line...<p>It the paper really "never" intended for the picture to be published I suspect they could have put a line through Diana's face or something. Someone knew that this picture would be worth money someday, and while they may not have wanted to pulish it at that time, they obviously saw the value in keeping it.</p>Paul Myles commented on 'Princess Diana photo — 'not to be published' — shrouded in mystery'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341bf8f353ef017d3f7f1795970c2013-01-04T21:59:38Z2013-01-04T22:45:37ZPaul MylesI believe that the bottle is Ballantine's Scotch<p>I believe that the bottle is Ballantine's Scotch</p>Constance commented on 'Princess Diana photo — 'not to be published' — shrouded in mystery'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341bf8f353ef017c355019c3970b2013-01-04T21:50:06Z2013-01-04T21:53:48ZConstanceOh here we go again. Just because the photo was 'stamped' with a date doesn't mean it was the date...<p>Oh here we go again. Just because the photo was 'stamped' with a date doesn't mean it was the date the picture was taken, most like the date the picture was developed. If you ask me, she looks younger in the photo then when she got engaged to Chuck.</p>The fairytale is over commented on 'Princess Diana photo — 'not to be published' — shrouded in mystery'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341bf8f353ef017ee6f328d1970d2013-01-04T20:57:59Z2013-01-04T21:53:48ZThe fairytale is over" 'This would certainly not be the way the Royal Family would have wanted Diana to be presented at that...<p>" 'This would certainly not be the way the Royal Family would have wanted Diana to be presented at that moment, given that two days before her engagement had been announced,' Eric Caren, owner of the Caren Archive, told the Daily Mail."... And just a few decades later, when Diana's son married, his bride-to-be had an exhaustive number of pictures on Youtube in highly unflattering states. I guess the days of the Firm having control over the "princess narrative" is coming to an end. </p>Paul commented on 'Princess Diana photo — 'not to be published' — shrouded in mystery'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341bf8f353ef017d3f7eacec970c2013-01-04T20:45:41Z2013-01-04T21:53:48ZPaulSure looks like her BROTHER!!!<p>Sure looks like her BROTHER!!!</p>Darlene12@mac.com commented on 'Princess Diana photo — 'not to be published' — shrouded in mystery'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341bf8f353ef017d3f7ea22d970c2013-01-04T20:38:03Z2013-01-04T20:42:57ZDarlene12@mac.comSo perhaps she was not the virgin brood mare for the royal family after all. Diana did not obey her...<p>So perhaps she was not the virgin brood mare for the royal family after all. Diana did not obey her masters. If only Kate and William had her spirit and said no to the corruption of the monarchy. Diana's crime was that she actually cared.</p>Ron Bergundy commented on 'Princess Diana photo — 'not to be published' — shrouded in mystery'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341bf8f353ef017ee6f2d876970d2013-01-04T20:00:05Z2013-01-04T20:31:03ZRon BergundyOMG WHAT IS SHE WEARING? CAN WE SEE MORE PICTURES OF DIANA NOW THAT SHE'S DEAD & PEERING IN TO...<p>OMG WHAT IS SHE WEARING? CAN WE SEE MORE PICTURES OF DIANA NOW THAT SHE'S DEAD & PEERING IN TO HER PERSONAL LIFE HAS SOMEHOW CHANGED FROM THE NIGHT SHE DIED?? CAN WE CAN WE CAN WE??!?!?!? lols</p>concerned about our future with morals like this commented on 'Princess Diana photo — 'not to be published' — shrouded in mystery'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341bf8f353ef017ee6f29f59970d2013-01-04T19:23:53Z2013-01-04T19:44:13Zconcerned about our future with morals like thisSo if this is a new mystery, is that the bottle of Johnny Walker, Red Label, (sitting on the window...<p>So if this is a new mystery, is that the bottle of Johnny Walker, Red Label, (sitting on the window sill,) going to fuel the fire of passion!!<br />
Leave the doll alone, she has passed in a cloak of turmoil, we don't have to flog this to death.<br />
You journalists should get life or at least buy yourselves some second hand morals from the Sally Ann..,</p>Kevin S commented on 'Princess Diana photo — 'not to be published' — shrouded in mystery'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341bf8f353ef017ee6f28a36970d2013-01-04T19:10:14Z2013-01-04T19:10:24ZKevin SThe guy is reading a book and happens to be leaning on her.....sheesh<p>The guy is reading a book and happens to be leaning on her.....sheesh</p>Nina commented on 'Princess Diana photo — 'not to be published' — shrouded in mystery'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341bf8f353ef017c354f2614970b2013-01-04T19:02:58Z2013-01-04T19:03:24ZNina http://www.ninaflower.comPrince Harry's real father ?<p>Prince Harry's real father ? </p>Charlieman commented on 'Princess Diana photo — 'not to be published' — shrouded in mystery'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341bf8f353ef017c354f0f84970b2013-01-04T18:47:48Z2013-01-04T18:47:54ZCharlieman...I meant Ballantine's scotch whisky.<p>...I meant Ballantine's scotch whisky.</p>Charlieman commented on 'Princess Diana photo — 'not to be published' — shrouded in mystery'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341bf8f353ef017ee6f268ac970d2013-01-04T18:45:39Z2013-01-04T18:45:54ZCharliemanJohnnie Walker? Are we sure that's not a bottle of Ballantine's Irish Whisky?<p>Johnnie Walker? Are we sure that's not a bottle of Ballantine's Irish Whisky?</p>Fred Dwarzell commented on 'Princess Diana photo — 'not to be published' — shrouded in mystery'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341bf8f353ef017ee6f26408970d2013-01-04T18:42:47Z2013-01-04T18:42:54ZFred DwarzellOr could the mystery man be .... her brother?<p>Or could the mystery man be .... her brother?</p>onthehill commented on 'Princess Diana photo — 'not to be published' — shrouded in mystery'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341bf8f353ef017ee6f24902970d2013-01-04T18:27:01Z2013-01-04T18:35:49Zonthehillhttp://profile.typepad.com/6p017d3f7dd862970cIf the photo was indeed taken on Feb. 26, 1981 (you say it was "dated" Feb. 26, 1981), Diana would...<p>If the photo was indeed taken on Feb. 26, 1981 (you say it was "dated" Feb. 26, 1981), Diana would have been 19, not 17 or 18. She was born July 1, 1981.</p>