With the sounds of Caribana mingling with all the other music in and around us this weekend, I thought about how unconscious most of us are about our aural environment.
If our TV broadcasters can do reruns, so can writers, right? So, this being Simcoe Day, a public holiday in Ontario, I'm going to take it easy. Here's an article of mind published in the Star in October, 2007 about the interaction between our brains and music.
Look down
any bus, subway car or sidewalk and you'll see many a pair of slim wires
dangling from earlobes, the telltale signs of our obsession with music.
We pipe
it directly to our eardrums. We surround ourselves with it at home, in the car
and while shopping.
We
instinctively know our favourite song or the perfect piece to fit or change a
mood. We pump up volume and tempo to get our adrenaline flowing. We look for
slow melodies and easy harmonies to unwind after a stressful day.
Could it
be that this is the ultimate in psychological self-medication?
Although
most of us don't know why we choose to listen to a particular kind of music at
any given time, we know it affects how we feel. And we know how and when to
administer the right dose.
Filmmakers
have worked the art of emotional manipulation through music from the days when
the soundtrack came from a live piano or organ player in the theatre.
Consumer marketers
know how to push these buttons as well. Next time you walk through Ikea, stop
to listen how the ambient music is different in each department.
But this
is nothing new.
Three
hundred years ago, William Congreve wrote the now-immortal words in his play
The Mourning Bride: "Music hath charms to soothe the savage breast/To
soften rocks, or bend a knotted oak."
Two
thousand years before that, Socrates sat down with his pupils Glaucon and
Adeimantus to discuss how to create a good and noble human being. As recorded
in Plato's Republic, Socrates stated that, "rhythm and harmony find their
way to the inmost soul and take strongest hold upon it, bringing with them and
imparting grace..."
Yet for
all of history (and iPod playlists), the science of understanding the link
between music and the brain is only in its infancy.
Thanks to
electronic and magnetic brain-imaging equipment and sophisticated computer data
analysis, a cutting edge of scientists is accumulating data that show precisely
what is going on between the ear buds and the smile on our lips.
Last
year, Montreal cognitive psychologist Daniel Levitin published This Is Your
Brain on Music, a lively book based on his research at the Laboratory for Music
Perception, Cognition and Expertise at McGill University.
Last week
saw the release of prominent American neurologist Oliver Sacks's latest opus, Musicophilia,
a riveting compilation of his decades of work with people and music.
A former
music producer and punk-rocker, Levitin indulged in such public scientific
spectacles as attaching hundreds of electrodes to symphony orchestra conductor
Keith Lockhart, five members of the orchestra, and a handful of audience
members during a live performance last year.
Levitin's
computer screen showed instant physical responses to changes in the music's
tempo and pitch.
Sacks's
approach is deeply personal, yet the accumulated weight of his experiences is
even more compelling.
Somehow
the issue remains abstract until someone places electrodes on your own head.
Deep
inside a building on the Hamilton's McMaster University campus recently, I sat
down in a soundproof studio while a research assistant placed a "cap"
containing 128 electrodes on my head.
I sat
facing a video monitor so that I could see the 128 lines of data being sent to
a computer in the next room.
The
slightest twitch of my head or the blink of an eye would send the steady lines
into jagged paroxysms. "So try to stay as still as possible, " I was
instructed. Yeah, right.
I was
about to hear sequences of two simple tones. In most instances, the second tone
would be higher than the first. But then, without warning, would come a tone
manipulated to sound like it was lower than the others.
If my
brain worked like everyone else's, it would register the sound of something
different as a sudden increase in activity. And, blinking aside, that's exactly
what happened. As soon as the tonal pattern was broken, the jagged waves would
appear once again on the video monitor.
This
experiment, and dozens like it, is being repeated several times a day in that
room, mainly with infants and children, so that we can better learn how young
brains develop.
The
research is led by Dr. Laurel Trainor, the founding force of the McMaster
Institute for Music and the Mind (MIMM).
Started
in January 2006, it and the research institute at McGill University are
Canada's contribution to unlocking the electro-chemical secrets of how our
brains respond to music.
But the
focus at MIMM is a bit different than in Montreal, as Trainor has included
professors and researchers from other departments and faculties.
"This
is an interdisciplinary effort, " she says in her office, in which every
flat surface testifies to the international conferences she has attended, or is
about to visit, and to the reams of research coming out of MIMM and its
counterparts.
"Because
McMaster's music department is focused on education, " says Trainor,
"much of our research is aimed at helping improve how music is taught to
children." She introduces Dr. Keith Kinder, director of the McMaster
School of the Arts, who is keen on building on the institution's reputation in
the music-teaching field.
In the
course of a day, we also meet Dr. Ian Bruce at the Engineering faculty. As one
of the world's experts on electronic signal processing, he is involved in
trying to develop better hearing aids.
At the
department of Mathematics, Dr. David Earn is honing the language used to
compile, interpret and extrapolate research data.
McMaster
School of the Arts professor David Gerry also has a part - both as teacher and
student.
A
professional flutist, Gerry is acknowledged as the world's leading flute
teacher using the Suzuki-method (where students learn to play an instrument by
imitation and repetition, in a group). His teaching travels regularly take him
to Central and South America, where he realized that children from Latin
cultures had a much more highly developed sense of rhythm than children in
Ontario.
"It
has to do with the more complex rhythms that are part of the music, " says
Gerry. Wanting to find ways to better teach rhythm here, the flute player
looked into the research at MIMM and decided he wanted to be a part of it.
"There
is so much we can learn, " he says as he begins a year of post-graduate
work with the institute. "I'm nervous about going back to school, but this
is also very exciting."
As with
Gerry, observation is at the roots of Oliver Sacks's insights. The son of a
musician who still plays his father's vintage Bechstein grand piano, Sacks has
always been curious about how our brains and music interact.
In Musicophilia,
Sacks describes how his professional, neurological connection to music
blossomed after he began working with immobile patients in a long-term-care
hospital in the Bronx four decades ago:
"In
1966, there was no medication of any use to these patients - no medication, at
least, for their frozenness, their parkinsonian motionlessness. And yet it was
common knowledge among the nurses and staff that these patients could move on
occasion, with an ease and grace that seemed to belie their parkinsonism - and
that the most potent occasioner of such movement was, in fact, music."
In the
course of 350-plus pages, Sacks shares the extraordinary stories of people
whose personal worlds have been transformed by music - from a non-musical
football player who became obsessed with classical music after being struck by
lightning, to explaining the nature of musical "brainworms, " those
nasty little songs that get stuck inside our heads.
Sacks
leads us inside the brain to show how and why we combine tone, rhythm and shape
into the entity we call music. Along the way, we see how the brain has an
almost miraculous ability to adapt to injuries and disease.
The most
touching of Sacks's stories is also the most powerful example of music as
medicine.
In 1985,
British musicologist Clive Wearing, then in his forties, came down with a
severe brain infection that left him with a memory span of a few seconds,
condemning him to live every moment of his life as if it was his first.
Sacks
tells in powerful detail how doctors and Wearing's wife almost gave up hope of
giving back Wearing a semblance of meaning to his existence. It took years,
but, in the end, salvation lay in reintroducing Wearing to the piano, which he
had once played so well.
"The
rope that is let down from heaven for Clive comes not with recalling the past,
as for Proust, but with performance - and it holds only as long as the
performance lasts. Without performance, the thread is broken, and he is thrown
back once again into the abyss."
In
essence, the melodic line and rhythm carry with them an inevitable momentum
that engages our mind in special ways.
"Listening
to music is not a passive process but intensely active, involving a stream of
inferences, hypotheses, expectations and anticipations, " writes Sacks.
It's a tonic at once simple and complex that can soothe the savage breast - or
straighten a ravaged brain.
Although
neither Sacks nor Levitin nor Trainor would ever stoop to such a blunt
conclusion, it seems increasingly clear that we are, each in our own way,
experts in musical self-medication.
A more
elegant summary belongs to Sacks: "Music, uniquely among the arts, is both
abstract and profoundly emotional. It has no power to represent anything
particular or eternal, but it has a unique power to express inner states or
feelings. Music can pierce the heart directly; it needs no mediation
WHAT DO
WE KNOW?
There
have been a number of recent "aha" moments in brain research. Here
are some highlights in the music area:
DAMAGE
AND DISABILITY
- If some
of the thousands of sound-receptor hairs in our ears become damaged, the brain
can correct for missing frequencies.
- In most
people, if hearing is lost in one ear, the brain will partially compensate over
time by creating a fake stereo effect.
- Musical
memory is so deeply embedded in our memories that even advanced Alzheimer's
patients can respond to music from childhood. Some advanced Parkinson's victims
can overcome immobility or tremors and even dance when they hear favourite
pieces of music.
CHILDHOOD
DEVELOPMENT
- Our
preference for consonant over dissonant music is hard-wired in our brain, not
acquired.
- The
relationship between musical pitch and mood is also hard-wired.
- Our
affinity for certain types of rhythms is culturally acquired.
- Physical
movement affects how we perceive rhythm.
- Children
who get weekly music lessons score a few points higher on IQ scores than those
who do not participate in regular musical activities.
Recent Comments