Now it looks like that shining, gleaming pillar of motherhood, Debbie Rowe, wants custody of her kids after the possibility of lots of money all. TMZ reports that, "Debbie Rowe will fight for custody of Paris and Michael Jr., the children born during her marriage to Michael Jackson -- this, according to NBC 4 in Los Angeles. According to the NBC 4 website, Rowe said during a 90-minute phone conversation, "I want my children." Rowe says she will seek a restraining order to keep Joe Jackson away from the children. Rowe also says she'll submit to a DNA test to prove she's the biological mother."
Video of Jackson rehearsing on June 23:
I'm on Debbie Rowe's side. So far as those children are concerned, she did all the heavy lifting.
Posted by: Leon Arp | July 02, 2009 at 02:46 PM
I'm still in disbelief that this spledid artist has passed on. As a mother my first concern are the children...and then the fight for his money. I know that Debbie is the mom of 2 of the children and all children do deserve their moms, but it should be stipulated that the 3 children stay together with her then. I think in the best interest of the children they must STAY TOGETHER. And honestly away from the madness that MJ experienced growing up a Jackson. I think the 3 would be better off with Debbie Rowe. I pray that they will not be split up and if the 3 are given to the Jackson family, that Debbie Rowe have complete say in how her children be raised. God help that these children can grow up as "normal" as possible.
As a mother Debbie should fight with all her might for the 3!! Not just the two.
Posted by: MAAV | July 02, 2009 at 10:55 PM
I find it amazing that the catalyst must be Joe Jackson to allow Debbie Row the pillar of motherhod,(yeah right)to now declare rights to those children. The rest of the Jackson sons have been married for years and raised families of their own. I have not heard where any of their children,have suffered or fell into destruction for having Joe Jackson as their grandfather. Those children will be surrounded by aunts,uncles and cousins who will love them to the fullest because their family and because of Michael,get a grip. MICHEAL WAS A GENIUS, and I am sure his desire to have those children remain part of his family was not something he just haphazardly thought about. Joe jackson is an old man that runs of at the mouth I dont take him seriously. IF YOU REALLY WANT TO HONOR MICHAEL HONOR HIS WISHES IN HIS LAST TESTAMENT AND LET HIM REST IN PEACE.
Posted by: BRENDA | July 03, 2009 at 09:20 AM
I agree with the above and will add on another point - if Debbie Row was such a good mom how come she sold her children to Michael in the first place? When they divorced she could have kept the children why did she agree to money instead? All she is interested is more money from MJ's estate - shame on her - if I were a judge I'd just kick her out of court. The children are better off staying with the family they have grown up with. Katherine especially must be in excruciating pain and am sure she is getting a little comfort from the children - don't punish her further by taking them away.
Posted by: E Muhumuza | July 06, 2009 at 08:16 AM
I am having a problem. I remember Michael making a recording "she's mine" with Paul Mac of beatle fame orBarry Gibbs. Since his passing, I've not heard this song played>is there a reason for this? Please comment on this or pass it on to someone who can.
Thank you
Posted by: Alvin Deskin | July 11, 2009 at 02:09 PM