Connect with Facebook | Login/Register
 
collapse Site map

« Trailer for Brake | Main | Taiwanese animators explain the Demi Moore mess »

January 26, 2012

Lindsay Lohan in legal trouble again

LohanThis time she's being sued. Radaronline has this:

"Turns out, Lindsay Lohan wasn't telling us the truth. NO! After the troubled actress was involved in a hit-and-run in West Hollywood in September 2010 - striking a nanny pushing a stroller carrying a child - she denied it to RadarOnline.com, telling us at the time, “I don’t know what you are talking about" - despite the fact we'd already broken the story and spoken to multiple eyewitnesses! SHE MIGHT NOT HAVE BEEN LYING. IT'S ENTIRELY POSSIBLY THAT SHE WOULDN'T NOTICE IT IF SHE RAN OVER AN ENTIRE CIRCUS PARADE Now, the Mean Girls star might want to rethink her “I don’t know what you are talking about" defense, as we've learned that the nanny, Nubia Del Carmen Preza, filed a lawsuit with the Los Angeles Superior Court on Wednesday claiming injuries related to the incident. (Preza is also suing Black And White Car Rental, who provided LiLo with the Masserati Granturismo she was driving at the time. WHAT ABOUT THE PEOPLE WHO PAINTED THE ZEBRA CROSSING? AND THE MANUFACTURER OF THE STROLLER? AND THE PARENTS OF THE CHILD?) At the time, we spoke to eyewitness Brayan Jaime, who told us exclusively his recollection of the incident. "There was a woman pushing a kid in the stroller, maybe a 2-or 3-year-old, crossing the street," Jaime said. "Lindsay took the red light and hit the stroller. It wasn't super hard, but she made impact and hit them. Lindsay pulled to the right, stopped for two seconds, and then just kept going." SHE CLEARLY HAD MORE IMPORTANT PLACES TO BE. THERE MIGHT HAVE BEEN SOME PARTY THAT SHE WASN'T INVITED TO. He told us in a later chat: “From the way she was driving the day I saw her hit the woman with the stroller, it’s definitely possible she was on drugs! Maybe that's why she sped off so quickly," adding he was "100 per cent sure Lindsay was driving, because I saw her with my own eyes." LUCKY THING, TOO. IMAGINE HOW MUCH IT WOULDN'T BE ADMISSABLE IN COURT IF HE'D BEEN USING THE EYES OF, SAY, A RACCOON OR A SPIDER ROBOT? Another eyewitness, photographer Austin Visschedyk, told us exclusively he pulled up next to Lindsay after he saw her knock down the stroller. "I said, 'Whoa, what the f**k are you doing?" to which she replied, “Well, I saw them, but they didn’t move out of the way.” EXACTLY. SLOW BLEEPS WITH THEIR SLOW STROLLERS FULL OF SLOW CHILDREN. BLEEPING ANNOYING. LET'S RUN THEM ALL DOWN.

Frazer Harrison/Getty Images

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf8f353ef0168e61f0e03970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Lindsay Lohan in legal trouble again:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Stargazing blog by Malene Arpe


  • Malene’s interests and hobbies include Schadenfreude, sci-fi and fantasy (good and bad alike), hilarious hair pieces, age-inappropriate celebrity crushes, messed-up starlets, waiting for the next Star Trek movie, hating Björk, creative profanity, disobedient robots, fake celebrity relationships, post-apocalyptic dread, singing super-villains, baseball, David Beckham (but only when he keeps his mouth shut), vampires and knitting tiny sweaters for her seven cats. That’s not true. Maybe.

    Email: marpe@thestar.ca

Recent Comments