« When parking signs are hard to understand, the city rakes it in | Main | Online speed trap survey missed the biggest fishing hole of all - Toronto »

08/28/2012

The proof is in the trees that bag tax works

IMG_1080
Anyone who thinks the five cent tax on shopping bags wasn’t worth the money need only look at the trees beside Dufferin Mall for evidence of its value.

As of July 1, the nickel per shopping bag fee was killed by city council at the urging of Mayor Rob Ford, who got more than he bargained for when it also passed a bylaw prohibiting plastic shopping bags as of 2013.

But retailers are still charging a nickel for a bag, insisting they’re doing it for the environment, when we all know it’s a nose stretching lie, driven by parsimony.

Before the bag tax kicked in, we wrote a Fixer column about a sickening amount of shopping bags that were caught in the branches of a line of trees next to the Dufferin Mall, on Dufferin St., south of Bloor St.

So many bags were blown by the wind into the trees from the mall’s elevated parking deck that they fluttered like leaves in the bare branches, and added up to an excellent reason for measures to cut down on their use.

We walked along the retaining wall between the top level of the parking deck and the trees while at the mall Tuesday and were delighted to see only a few bags caught in the branches, a dramatic improvement from a couple years earlier.

While shredded bags also fluttered from trees in many other places prior to the tax, we’ve noticed a lot fewer of them lately, which squares with the large overall reduction in the number of bags shoppers are using since the tax kicked in.

While most of us resent having to pay for them, when we know the money is offsetting retailers’ costs to provide bags, there is no arguing that it is has had the desired effect of keeping them out of trees and landfills.

The 2013 bag ban imposed by city council will likely be far more irritating to many people than the nickel tax, but is likely to be an even better measure to keep them out of the wrong places, and that can’t be a bad thing.

 

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

We don't mind paying "when we know the money is offsetting retailers’ costs to provide bags"???? Who are you kidding? The 5-cent charge is approximately 3 to 10 times the retailer's cost, depending on the retailer. That's not offsetting anything - it's contributing to their bottom line, plain and simple. And there's another factor that benefits the retailer too, at least in the grocery stores. Have you noticed that when you bring your own bags, the cashiers generally don't offer to do the bagging any more? I've had cashiers who give me a blank stare when I hand them my bags, as though they don't know what to do with them.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

The Fixer

  • Since 2004, reporter Jack Lakey, also known as The Fixer, has fielded thousands of complaints from readers about ailing municipal services across the city. From potholes to parking, and streetcars to street lights, Jack's goal is to get to the bottom of the problem and get it fixed for you.