« Cyclist’s death one more reason to create a network of bike lanes | Main | Streetcar rails a poor fit for College St. cycling lane »

10/11/2012

Casino proposal should be thoroughly debated

The public debate over a proposed Toronto casino began Wednesday at Toronto and East York community council with a declaration from city Councillor George Mammoliti that the meeting was “illegal.”

George has never been the sharpest knife, (which explains his utility as a lieutenant to Mayor Rob Ford), but to attack the legitimacy of such a hot-button topic at a committee of council is as dumb as dirt.

Only George could say “I don’t think this meeting should exist,” then vault the fence and opine that the casino debate should be open to the whole city and not just the Toronto and East York councillors who organized the forum.

He must have been watching Mitt Romney last week.

George knew the deck was stacked against a casino by a majority of community council members who would vote against it, and by the many people who oppose it among the 40 who signed up to address the meeting.

George is right; the casino debate should indeed be open to the whole city, and great effort should be made to canvass the opinions of anyone who feels strongly about it.

But for some reason he didn’t see community council as the correct venue, and the Wednesday meeting as the right time to get started.

Here’s a bet: If the feverish casino lobby had been organized in stacking the list of speakers with shills, it would have been a perfect time to kick off the discussion.

If city council is to take its direction from the opinions of people without a direct stake in the decision, it will quite likely turn down a casino.

Has anyone out there heard a deep, throaty rumble from a public that absolutely demands a casino within the borders of Toronto?

I’m still waiting to hear it.

So bring on the debate, at all of Toronto’s community councils and anywhere else. Let’s make sure everyone is heard, and that city council makes it decision based on a consensus of public opinion.

I’d double down on a wager that a majority of the public doesn’t want a casino, and instinctively knows that the false promise of kajillion casino jobs comes at a terrible price.

      

 

 

  

   

  

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Let's not invite the criminal syndicates to grab another hold. While casinos generate big money, who actually profits from the gaming? My taxes will still increase. No debate.

Casinos aside, why is a mega-million $ project to revamp Nathan Phillips Square underway when our roads and sidewalks are in such disrepair? This City is a crazy quilt of broken concrete and lousy patch jobs. Everywhere I go I see and often trip over the sloppy, ugly patchwork. Surely those mega-millions would be better spent on proper road and sidewalk repairs, rather than refurbishing the City Hall landscape.

Sorry to digress.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

The Fixer

  • Since 2004, reporter Jack Lakey, also known as The Fixer, has fielded thousands of complaints from readers about ailing municipal services across the city. From potholes to parking, and streetcars to street lights, Jack's goal is to get to the bottom of the problem and get it fixed for you.