The left-leaning councillors who used to run City Hall, including Gord Perks, Janet Davis and Adam Vaughan, spent Monday and Tuesday visiting the budget committee. They came like snipers, one after the other taking aim at their hosts over proposed cuts to the Tenant Defence Fund, bus routes, a program to detect lead in tap water, and much more.
Budget chair Mike Del Grande and his vice-chair, Doug Ford, fired back with fusillades that must have warmed the hearts of council conservatives who were routinely shut down when David Miller was mayor. The off-the-cuff speeches are instructive because they give Torontonians a sense of what the Ford administration is thinking and planning, likely more so than the carefully crafted speeches made by the mayor.
Here is Doug Ford at committee on Tuesday:
“There was a clear mandate from the people of Toronto that they want less government, they want to stop the wasteful spending. And I can assure you - You said there was no gravy down here. Well, I’ve only been here a couple months, but I can assure everyone in this room that there is more gravy than there is at Thanksgiving Thanksgiving. Have we got to it yet? No we haven’t got to it yet. We’re hitting the low hanging fruit ...
We're pushing this (budget) forward to bring it up to the end of February, until we have eight months to go through line item by line item, every piece of paper, every roll of toilet paper, look at synergies. So anyone to sit back that says there's no gravy at city hall has been stuck down here for too long. They're in this little glass room thinking this is the way it's done ...
I can assure you every department down here has fat. There isn't one single department that does not have fat down here and they would not surive in the private sector, I guarantee you ... In my guesstimate, there's probably 10 per cent waste and fat ...People have been down here too long, they don’t know what’s going on in the real world. The real world is making things run efficiently.
Customers call me up and ask me for a 10 per cent reduction or I’ll go somewhere else. The problem is the government has a monopoly. We have to break that monopoly. They have to be competitive with the private sector. Yes we should outsource everything we can. Let the unions compete, because they haven’t had to compete in their lives.”
and here is Del Grande from Monday:
“All of a sudden this year we’re supposed to make things happen that some people couldn’t make happen for seven years. And if we just went along our merry way, I think the board of trade said 5.9, let’s round it off to 5 per cent, we need $575 million here to just basically try to tread the water the way we’ve done.
That’s without adding any of the other things that people want to add. It’s not getting to the $25 (per capita) for the arts funding, even though people applauded and cheered themselves when we brought in that tax. And lo and behold, it went into general revenues. It didn’t go into the arts. That wasn’t done today. That was done yesterday. So all of a sudden that’s a big issue because we haven’t fulfilled a commitment.
So $575 million and you do the simple math, let’s say we didn’t do the car registration tax, we kept it and we raised taxes by the rate of inflation, that’s $100 million. $100 million versus $575 million that people want to spend, that’s still a gap of $400 million. And I don’t know where else you’re going to find more taxes to pay for that, whether you’re going to increase the car registration tax, increase land transfer tax, increase more and more and more.
The middle income (residents), it falls on their shoulder to pay for all this. A key word that everybody forgets here is called affordability. You spend what you can afford to spend. And sometimes it makes for hard decisions to say no. No we can’t do it. No we can’t provide for more.
Car registration, bring it back. It still doesn’t cover. So you know, we’ve had an election where people have said enough’s enough. We want you to downsize government. And we can’t afford those things we can’t afford. It’s as basic as that.
I find it ironic when I sat on the opposite side of things here, we were a nuisance. We rarely came in here because we knew what the end outcome was going to be in terms of the vote. Now people are surprised that there’s a different way of thinking here. Those that advocated for the way things were done in the past isn’t happening. That’s life, that’s elections, that’s what it’s all about.
We start with a deficit here, every year we’re short half a billion dollars. Structurally short. What you want is revenues matching expenses. That’s your starting point but we don’t seem to get that here."
Recent Comments