Messier (And Not The Player) in Montreal
Could it get any worse these days for the Montreal Canadiens in the middle of what is supposed to be a celebration of their centennial season?
Apparently, yes it could.
With the Habs in freefall on the ice with five straight defeats, a report today in La Presse suggests that owner George Gillett is looking at selling the team as he searches for ways to deal with financial challenges to his diversified interests.
"We're not hiding it," team president Pierre Boivin told La Presse. "We're going through a very difficult economic period."
This report comes four months after the same newspaper reported that Gillett was considering selling the team to Jim Balsillie of Blackberry fame. That report was immediately denied by both Gillett and Basillie, and Balsillie went so far as to offer and apology to the Canadiens' owner.
Gillett bought the Canadiens for $275 million in 2000 at a time when no other investor, either local or Canada-based, was willing to purchase the famous hockey club. Since then, the Habs have consistently sold-out the Bell Centre and led the league in attendance, and this year hosted the NHL all-star game and are hosting the NHL entry draft in Montreal.
Gillett has many different interests, including co-ownership in Liverpool of the English Premier League, as well as stakes in NASCAR, ski resorts, marine transportation, golf courses and an auto dealership chain.
He has become a popular figure in Montreal, often seen walking the streets after Canadiens home games, or dropping in a local establishment to talk hockey with fans.
If the club is put up for sale, the question would again arise as to whether any Montrealer or Quebecer would want to buy it.
It would then become the second NHL club to officially go up for sale since the global economic crisis struck. The Phoenix Coyotes have been for sale for several months, although there has been talk recently that a group has stepped forward with interest in buying the franchise. There has also been great speculation about the future of the money-losing Tampa Bay Lightning, sold last year to Hollywood producer Oren Koules and former NHLer Len Barrie.
The Canadiens, of course, are an entirely differently proposition. Last year they were valued by Forbes magazine as the league's third most valuable franchise. NHL commissioner Gary Bettman has repeatedly insisted that league revenues are up and business is surprisingly good, but if Gillett puts the Habs up for sale it would be a significant dent in the NHL's "business as usual" stance.
Gillett borrowed $240 million of the $275 million to buy the Habs in the first place, and heavily leveraged transactions are among those most under duress these days because credit has become so tight. That said, this could also be about luring investors out of the weeds, or even forcing a renegotiation of some kind. like on the city's property tax charges on the Bell Centre.
Just last October, Gillett said in an interview with the Star that he believed in the NHL despite the world-wide economic woes.
"I don't know if I'd use the word 'concerned' yet,'' said Gillett. "The general state of the NHL is quite healthy. The six Canadian teams are fundamentally sold out. As far as ticket sales in the U.S., season tickets I'm told are up 4 per cent and game day sales are up 12 per cent.
"That's quite positive. That's an indication of the growing popularity of the sport.''

Not to be contrarian for the sake of contrarianism, but wouldn't the possibility exist that GG is talking about selling the Habs because they're an asset that hasn't likely lost its value?
Gillett chose the Habs, much like Liverpool, as they are "historical" or "cornerstone" franchises (I can't recall the term he used... but you get the idea) and are very unlikely to decrease in value.
Posted by: Iain | March 23, 2009 at 01:07 PM
Does anybody believe Gary Bettman when he suggests the league is doing just fine? We know that most of the sun belt teams are in a horrible state, and that in all likelihood, the league will have to contract to become sustainable. Everyone can see that his strategy of planting hockey teams among the deserts and orange groves of the United States has been a complete failure, and yet he presses on with his imperialistic strategy. I wonder how George Gillett feels about having to prop up teams like Florida, Tampa, Phoenix, Atlanta, and Nashville. I wonder how that, and the sorry state of the league in general, impacts the value of the Canadiens.
Posted by: Noam Sugarman | March 23, 2009 at 01:59 PM
The Star had an article last week about the plight of billionaires. Poor guys. $1000 MILLION +. It's a rough life.
Posted by: Jake Wilson | March 23, 2009 at 02:20 PM
The real question isn't whats going to happen, its why is this happening? I'm not sure Montreal has to worry that hard yet about a potential owner as why George Gillett wants to sell a profitable franchise? Is this because he wants to cut dead wood during the economic downturn and get rid of that ugly NHL franchise he has on his list of responsibilites?
Or is he finding that Montreal, like Liverpool, have such a fanatical fanbase that being less then Top 3 is not tolerated in the any case, that includes the media
Is this a cutback move on his part to throw more money at the liverpool loan or has Montreal Soured on him over the last year?
Posted by: Leafluvr | March 23, 2009 at 03:12 PM
Quote:
"I don't know if I'd use the word 'concerned' yet,'' said Gillett. "The general state of the NHL is quite healthy. The six Canadian teams are fundamentally sold out. As far as ticket sales in the U.S., season tickets I'm told are up 4 per cent and game day sales are up 12 per cent.
"That's quite positive. That's an indication of the growing popularity of the sport.''
More likely an indication of cooking the books.
Posted by: Mike | March 23, 2009 at 04:12 PM
This clears the way for some guy who made money in trucking to buy the Habs and move them to New Orleans or some other hockey hotbed.
Posted by: Johnnyk | March 23, 2009 at 04:57 PM
@Leafluvr
"Is this because he wants to cut dead wood during the economic downturn and get rid of that ugly NHL franchise he has on his list of responsibilites?"
This so called ugly franchise is rich with hockey tradition and class. Other teams like the Leafs can only dream of having the success and history that the Habs enjoy.
Posted by: Sanj | March 24, 2009 at 12:41 PM