« Whew, That Was Close | Main | Eight Games In »

April 14, 2011

Off And Running

After 60 minutes of playoff competition, there's no reason yet to doubt the Vancouver Canucks are the favourites to win the Stanley Cup this spring after being the NHL's best team during the regular season.

In a 2-0 victory in Game 1 against Chicago on Wednesday night, all the elements were there for the Canucks: excellent, 32-save netminding from Roberto Luongo, a take-charge first period, better depth than the opponent and a physical, aggressive style without the self-defeating nonsense of other years.

Someone may beat the Canucks in these playoffs and deny them the Cup.

But they appear to be a team unlikely to beat themselves this time.

Sure, the defending champion Blackhawks are, really, the defending champs in name only. On an opening night of generally tepid playoff competition - only Washington-Rangers was really a tight one - the Hawks seemed almost surprised to be a participant in the first period after backing into the tournament on the weekend.

Basically, half the team that won it all last spring has moved on, and in Game 1 against Vancouver, it sure looked like the Hawks have been reduced to a one-line team, with Ryan Johnson, Ben Smith and Jake Dowell not supplying a whole lot of experience or productivity up the middle behind captain Jonathan Toews. Having Troy Brouwer get in Luongo's space isn't the same as having Dustin Byfuglien crashing the crease, and the Hawks don't have an energy player like Ben Eager to run around and terrorize the Vancouver defence.

Toews, Pat Kane, Marian Hossa and Patrick Sharp were played to near exhaustion - all played more than 20 minutes - and after that first period, they actually helped the Hawks play to even terms against the Canucks in a game that was surprisingly open at times. In fact, had Luongo not made a spectacular right toe save against Brian Campbell late in the first period, the game might have proceeded differently.

As it was the Hawks did spring to life in the second, but Luongo made 15 saves. Vancouver, meanwhile, got those two first period goals from depth players Jannik Hanson and Chris Higgins on a night when the Sedin twins were mostly held in check.

Vancouver will take that winning formula every night. This team has matured, and doesn't necessarily need the Sedins to be terrific to win. While a little sketchy defensively in the second, the Canucks had the upper-hand physically all night and in the third didn't go into a defensive shell but kept pushing.

With Dave Bolland out, and with Kris Versteeg and Andrew Ladd elsewhere, the Hawks didn't have that annoying, chattering third line to throw out and irritate the Canucks, and generally speaking the game didn't include the roughhousing and chippiness that typified many of the post-season matches between the two clubs over the past two years.

Chicago was in the game, however, and the best news for the champs was that rookie goalie Corey Crawford played well with 31 savesl, and didn't look nearly as nervous or uncertain as he had in losing Game 82 against Detroit on the weekend.

The bad news for Chicago was that Vancouver didn't really show any weaknesses. We'll see if any emerge in Game 2.

 

 

 

Comments

Not a bad game. By game 3 the Hawks might show a different face though. Good for the Canucks in winning game 1, but 4 wins are required and defending Cup champs know what it takes to win.

if Vancouver needs Luongo to be that spectacular every night in order to win, then they had better re-think their strategy. i didn't watch the entire game, but did see the highlights this morning. looks to me as if it could have easily been a Hawks win. hopefully they make the necessary adjustments going forward.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

The Spin on Sports by Damien Cox


  • Damien Cox, the Star's hockey columnist and associate sports editor, takes turns stirring up trouble and chuckling at the foibles of the sporting world. He'll start with hockey, Canada's ongoing passion play, and stick his nose into a few other games and places where athletes reside. You'll love some of his thoughts, hate others and get a chance to give your two cents on all of them.

Recent Comments