The cavalry never did arrive.
A big part of the reason, of course, is that Buffalo, Carolina and the Rangers never opened the door quite enough to allow the Leafs to receive the help they would have required to get into the 2011 post-season tournament.
The Leafs at least made those teams make their putts. The Rangers, for example, had to go into a tough Philly rink yesterday and extract two points, which they did with a gritty, impressive performance.
Hard to blame the Leafs for that. They'd at least helped sound the the alarm in Ranger headquarters Saturday night with their sixth win in seven games, a 4-2 triumph in Ottawa.
At this point, it would be an achievement for the Leafs to get ninth place in the Eastern Conference, and that's pretty thin gruel. Ditto for the fact they are now 20th overall, which means that if things stay that way and Boston doesn't win the draft lottery on April 12th, the second first rounder the Bruins received from the Phil Kessel deal won't be a top 10 selection.
It'll still be a good pick of course. But the Leaf National Nightmare would be over, the tally will be final (Tyler Seguin, Jared Knight and somebody with this year's pick) and the screechers who guaranteed a Leaf apocalypse - back-to-back top two picks for Kessel/the sky is falling!! - will have been proven to be incorrect.
In five years, we'll know if the Leafs truly overpaid for Kessel. But not until then.
Meanwhile, the math may still tells us the Leafs are alive, but it's really time to move on to the next important question.
What now?
At this moment, the Leafs have two picks in the bottom third of the June entry draft to work with, plus an estimated $15 million or so in cap space this summer, and that's after signing James Reimer, Clarke MacArthur, Tyler Bozak and Luke Schenn to new contracts as restricted free agents.
That's not a bad position to be in for a club that will finish with between 84 and 90 points and one of the youngest rosters in hockey. If anything, however, it's the next move, or moves, and the process of trying to get the club not only back into post-season play but to the level of a serious playoff squad that will be tougher.
In other words, having gone from smoking crater to cinder block foundation with some landscaping in place, the more difficult job of designing a custom made home for a finicky customer begins now.
The natural inclination will be to argue that spending a zillion dollars on one player - Brad Richards - is the answer. Problem is, the corollary to that is that the Leafs are one player away, and they're not.
Moreover, the absence of gigantic, multi-year committments to individuals is part of what has the Leafs in this relatively favourable position for a non-playoff team. Some of the trades the team hasn't made, like dealing for Marc Savard last summer, have turned out to be decisions that have been beneficial, rather than costly.
In some ways, the situations of the Leafs and Blue Jays are similar, if not exact. Jays president Paul Beeston has made it clear he's ready to go to Rogers and ask for extra payroll monies when he thinks the time is right, and he doesn't think that time is now.
For the Leafs, it could be they're not at the point where spending $8 million a season on a player like Richards is the smartest move. There will be free agent options in the years ahead.
Really, the Leafs want to position themselves to eventually do what helped fuel Washington's late season charge this year, and that's add expensive veterans - Scott Hannan, Jason Arnott, Dennis Wideman - to try and put a young club over the top.
It's extremely unlikely that the Leafs will do anything like trade young players or picks for older talent, and more likely that they'll try to combine the assets they have to add a blue chip player that matches the age of their core group, somewhere between the ages of 22 and 26.
Richards turns 31 next month and is coming off a serious concussion. In 12 games since returning, he has two goals and six assists. If he were looking for a three-year committment as an unrestricted free agent this summer, it might be a better fit for the Leafs, but he'll be looking for something much longer. And will get it.
There's 25-year-old Paul Stastny, who didn't have a great season this year but would be Toronto's No. 1 centre. The cap hit is heavy at $6.6 million, but only for three more years. Depending on where Colorado is heading, he could be available. Or somebody like him.
Or, could Burke package the two firsts he owns and a young player - Nik Kulemin, Carl Gunnarson? - and move up in the draft to take a shot at a more talented prospect. The question for chief scout Dave Morrison to answer would be whether there's something truly compelling outside the top four - Gabriel Landeskog, Adam Larsson, Ryan Nugent-Hopkins and Sean Courturier - that would make it worth Toronto's efforts, because getting into that top four would be awfully tough.
If you could get Couturier, a big centre, and line him up with Nazem Kadri and Joe Colborne, you're looking at the strength down the middle that good teams are always looking for. But again, getting into that top four would be tough.
That said, a higher first round pick and some medium-priced UFAs could be correct approach for this off-season. Certainly, Colby Armstrong and Clarke MacArthur paid off handsomely last summer. That would leave room to see if other young players in the Leaf system like Jerry D'Amigo, Matt Frattin, Simon Gysbers and Colborne, for example, might be ready to make the big jump, and also leave space to re-sign the likes of Darryl Boyce, Joey Crabb and Tim Brent, all impending UFAs who made significant contributions this season.
That's the path I'd choose, particularly if, as reported, Ilya Bryzgalov has no interest in the Leafs. Others would go the Richards route. It's not a simple choice. That's why Burke gets the big money.
Recent Comments