« Toronto's Time To Host The (Profitable) Holiday Party | Main | Ducks Could Be Set To Move Getzlaf »

January 04, 2012

Not Just About The Goalies

Let's start with the facts.

For two straight years, Russia has been better than Canada in the big junior game that mattered.

And the Russians have done it far from home. Give them credit. Big dollops of it.

But not all losses are created equally.

And before we go too far down that path, let's remember the Canadian national junior team still has a chance to WIN a bronze medal.

Yes, yes, I know, only gold glitters in Canada when it comes to hockey. Blah, blah, blah.

This is not to say critical analysis of Canada's wild 6-5 loss - that score! again! - to the Russians on Tuesday night is somehow unfair because these are teenagers playing for their country and don't deserve anything but praise for being lovely Canadian boys as some would suggest.

But any suggestion from the other extreme, that Canada was outclassed and embarrassed by Russia, would be equally misleading.

That's the difference the final 20 minutes made.

If not for that, we'd be looking at this Don Hay-coached group as one that behaved petulantly and all but ran itself out of the sudden death semifinal contest.

But fighting back almost all the way from a five-goal, third period deficit while firing 56 shots as the opposing net is no reason for disgrace.

It's a helluva try.

Still, that's three straight years of no gold. Do we have a crisis on our hands similar to 1998?

Don't make me laugh. A hockey system that has produced in rapid succession gifts to the game like Sidney Crosby, Steven Stamkos, Taylor Hall, Jeff Skinner and Ryan Nugent-Hopkins has nothing to apologize for.

What was wrong back in '98, so wrong that Canada called a national forum on the matter, was largely fixed by a re-emphasis on skill development. Go watch minor hockey today. You'll see amazing stuff.

Back then, we weren't playing for bronze. We were losing to Kazakhstan and letting the rest of the world do skill while we supplied goons, goalies and grinders.

That has changed dramatically. So no crisis. No national inquiry.

What happened on Tuesday was that a good Canadian junior national team - not a great one - had it's vulnerabilities exposed by a Russian team that did the opposite of Canada.

Canada started terribly and ended strongly. Russia started brilliantly and finished barely hanging on, needing a goalpost and a huge save by a relief goalkeeper to avoid a bigger collapse than Canada's the year before in Buffalo.

Some years Team Canada's juniors will be excellent. Some years they'll just be good, and just good generally won't win this event. Ask Sweden, still hoping for its first gold since 1981.

Teenage talent is cyclical, even in talent-packed Canada, and the absence of high-end talent on this Canadian team - or its presence on NHL rosters - left this group a little short.

Russia, meanwhile, may be at the peak of a cycle. It had enough to win gold at the world juniors last year, and this year has come with a team armed with two dynamic teenagers, Nail Yakupov and Mikhail Grigorenko, who could go 1-2 in next June's NHL entry draft like Alex Ovechkin and Evgeny Malkin once did.

So next year in Ufa we may be talking about how good the Russians might be if Yakupov and Grigorenko weren't playing in Columbus and Anaheim, or something like that.

Many Canadians, of course, will want to pin this one on the goalies, and certainly 17 goals allowed by our masked men in three decisive games over the past three world juniors is deserving of scrutiny.

You can't hide the fact that when it mattered in 2010, 2011 and this year, Canada's goalkeeping wasn't good enough, or more accurately, not spectacular enough.

But a country that won gold in the past decade with the likes of Jeff Glass, Justin Pogge and Dustin Tokarski in net can't say that it has only recently hit a lull in the goaltending department.

We've been covering up this vulnerable area for a little while now, usually with sturdy, reliable team play, which is the way you're supposed to do it.

This year, Scott Wedgewood and Mark Visentin were powerless to halt the collapsing team around them, just as Visentin, with Olivier Roy helplessly looking on, couldn't do it on his own in the final 20 minutes last year against the Russians.

In Saskatoon against the Americans, Jake Allen and Martin Jones combined to give up six. Of these five goalies - Wedgewood, Visentin, Roy, Allen and Jones - it's unlikely, although not impossible, that any will be NHL all-stars.

They were top-end junior goalies thrust into a boiling cauldron of national expectations.

That said, Canada did win gold with Tokarski and Chet Pickard, and before that with Jonathan Bernier and Steve Mason. Indeed, Carey Price was the last truly world-class goalie to lead Canada to gold.

Before him, it was Pogge, and before him, Glass.

That's eight years of Canadian junior goalies and one legitimate star. Amidst a huge assortment of brilliant offensive and defensive talent, plus some very good forwards and blueliners who didn't even make the team, the parade of goalies hasn't been quite at the same level.

That said, understand this; the U.S. pulled it's starter to win overtime gold in 2010. Russia, lest we forget, pulled its starting goalie in the gold medal game last year and in last night's semifinals.

So its not like the countries beating Canada of late have had all the answers in goal, either.

EVERYBODY in hockey is guessing with goalies these days, whether it's Owen Sound winning the OHL last year rotating three goalies or Philly starting sophomore Sergei Bobrovsky ahead of $51 million man Ilya Bryzgalov in the Winter Classic or the Maple Leafs suddenly finding more success with Jonas Gustavsson between the pipes than James Reimer.

It's one-year-and-do-we-have-anyone-else?

Maybe it's a commentary on the current state of the position. With 99 per cent of goalies playing the same style, none seem able to establish excellence for long period of time or at multiple levels.

For Canada, the same quality of goalies as it had this year has been good enough before. What wasn't good enough this year was team play - too many penalties, poor defensive coverage, inconsistent forecheck - and the absence of anything equivalent to Yakupov and Evgeny Kuznetsov to dominate up front.

Perhaps if Tyler Seguin wasn't in Boston and Jeff Skinner wasn't in Carolina, that equation would be different.

Coaches - Hay this year, Dave Cameron last year - have to shoulder some of the weight for being unable to get panicking teenagers to re-focus in the middle of an important international game.

Last night, if Boone Jenner hadn't got himself tossed for a silly spear and Jonathan Huberdeau hadn't removed himself from the game for 12 critical minutes, the big comeback might have started earlier. We haven't seen that absence of discipline from a Canadian junior team for a long time.

Two other factors come into play. Canada cruised into the semifinals without really being tested, while Russia had tough jousts against Sweden and then the Czechs.

In a short tournament, Russia seemed more ready for battle last night. It was the same last year.

Second, this tourney ended a long run of world junior tourneys that had Canada mostly enjoying home ice advantage. That includes gatherings in Grand Forks and Buffalo that saw the stands filled with Canadians.

That comes with expectations. The Canadian-based events have also come with skyrocketing profits, maybe $20 million this year.

The stakes are being raised in Canada in a way they aren't being raised in other countries. Bigger crowds and bigger profits make the days of holding the tourney in Red Deer seem quaint.

So maybe going on the road to Russia next winter isn't a bad thing. Imagine the drama starting to build already for that.

Which is why Tuesday's result was, in a larger sense, good for the world juniors. It certainly adds texture to an event that needed it, perhaps, after 10 straight years of seeing Team Canada in the gold medal game.

 

 

 

 

Comments

6th goal I believe was a give up goal. 3 Russians and one Canadian[goalie] near the net.
Cost them dearly in hindsight.

Canada outplayed Russian for huge chunks of the game. We owned the puck in their zone for long stretches and generated plenty of chances. We lost for three reasons: 1) they had a hot goalie, 2) they had top-class finishers on offense, 3) we were undisciplined.

In a seven-game series, we would easily win. These things happen in a one-game knockout format. No reason to panic.

did you see the shot count??!! wonder what held russia in the game especially in the last 10 minutes!!!

Canada never should have gotten their last two goals. Just before they happened a Russian player was practically on a break away and was stripped and Canada should of gotten a penalty but did not. Then a minute later the Russians got a penalty on some cheap hooking class then Canada got a short handed goal and then another quick goal because they were all riled up.

Right on Damien, no need to expand on the obvious. Great theater last night. It will be interesting to see how the team bounces back in the Bronze game which will be an insight into the coaching as well as the players. Also it will be interesting to see how the tournament is run and supported next year in Ufa.

Canada should stop the delusion of being big and good on hockey because it has proven on multiple occasions it is not. Keep trying but please, stop being a megalomaniac. Prove it first.

Last night's kids were simply overwhelmed by the event. Not just a shakey start, but, the way they played. Penalty after penalty for high stick, tripping etc. The Russian team played a fluid fast paced game. As much as we love our kids, they are not talented enough to play that way. (perhaps because they come from such separate disparate systems??) Dump and chase isn't good enough anymore. It was in the last period, too little too late, that we started passing the puck around the Russian zone. That we stayed on top of the man and forced the Russians into mistakes in their defensive zone. Then we began to have some success.
But earlier in the game there were times when we had two and three checkers on the Russian player and still didn't come away with the puck.
But, to blame Don Hay for not having the boys ready??? No. Like everyone else, he was caught in the drama of the moment and his team lost their composure. No reflection on them, they are great kids and they tried hard.

Just two additions, if I may. 1. If it isn't Canada playing against stiffs in the fuirst round, it's someone else. It always make for a more tested or a more rested team. The time to comment on the format and participants is ... long before now; and 2. One other thing you forgot to mention: the size of the ice surface. Yes, many of the players are on major junior teams, but the competition at this level requires an international surface, and anything less disadvantages the Europeans.

Canada outplayed Russia most of the game; but they lacked the ability to finish early on. AFter getting to 2-1 and having all the momentum, a few mental lapses cost them the game. Especially that 6th goal with the Canadian defenseman throwing up his hands and not backchecking when he was called for slashing - that led to a 3 on 1 and was the game winner. Or that horrible change leading to a 2 on 0 breakaway. That was like an atoms or peewee game.

You need a goaltender to make one or two 'game saving' stops and we didn't get one.
That being said, you throw in a couple of Canadian <20 year olds playing in the NHL (Nugent-Hopkins, say?) and this is a different game. We had skill, but I felt Canada lacked a real creative offensive threat.

Well, Team Canada was terrible expectations to win. The Russians were loosey-goosey and though it nearly cost them in the end, they pulled it out.

Last night’s game left no doubt that the Russians are better team than the Canadians, even though the Russians let up in the final period. But the Canadian players showed superiority in poor sportsmanship putting their own interests ahead of the team’s.. Boone Jenner childishly speared a Russian after time was called and was expelled from the game, Jonathon Huberdeau earned a 10-minute penalty for slashing and Brett Connolly landed a perfect unprovoked blow to the jaw of a Russian player. The referee, just feet away, was so impressed with Connolly’s expertise that he didn’t issue a penalty. Bully for him! We should all be proud of Connolly for his boxing skill and showing some spunk

Excellent article as always, Damien.

I agree with your point, that there were more problems than just the goalies. However, the goalies were the biggest problem and the one that cost the Canadians the game. Unfortunately, it is the same situation as last year, in that the goalies cost the Canadians the gold medal last time around.

The Canadians outplayed the Russians by a wide margin the entire game. The shot differential illustrates that. The Russians had a few moments of brilliance, especially with Yakupov and Kuznetsov, but they didn't have enough of these moments to "deserve" a win.

The Canadians were undisciplined, but not undisciplined enough to justify the loss. The officials over-reacted to Jenner's spear and to Huberdeau's tap of his stick on the boards. (The official indicated the misconduct with such an enthusiastic motion to his hips, he should probably be disciplined himself for turning a "call" into a wholely disrespectful gesture.)

All in all, the Canadians lost this game because their goaltending was not good enough, and the Russian goaltending for most of the game was incredible. Yes, there were other problems, but THIS problem cost the Canadians the game. Besides the goalies, the Canadians were the much better team.

LOL @ "if this was a seven game series". Meaning in the other 6 games Canada wouldn't play poorly and expose their lack of maturity?

In any case, it's not a seven game series. What an annoying comment.

Damien, I appreciate you aren't a Leafs homer - really I do, I'm glad for it, too, since someone needs to keep the American Maple Leafs accountable, but I didn't know you were a Habs fan until you proclaimed that Price is a world class goalie.

That's ludicrous.

And even if it *was* that that means you'd have to at least lump Mason in there with him.

Canada outplayed russia tremendously but could not capitalize in Almost all chances they had. the Russian goalie is what held them in the game, as anyone can see from the shot count. Last time I checked 10 minutes left in the third it was 54-23 for Canada that's excluding the 30+ shots we had in those final 10 minutes. If they wouldn't have gave up so early allowing Russia to get a larger lead just from simple errors that gaame would have been ours!!!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

The Spin on Sports by Damien Cox


  • Damien Cox, the Star's hockey columnist and associate sports editor, takes turns stirring up trouble and chuckling at the foibles of the sporting world. He'll start with hockey, Canada's ongoing passion play, and stick his nose into a few other games and places where athletes reside. You'll love some of his thoughts, hate others and get a chance to give your two cents on all of them.