« City of Shining Lights | Main | Into the Wee Hours »

December 05, 2012

Holding Pattern

NEW YORK--Not much to say. Yet. Which may be good.

"We are pleased with the process that is ongoing," said NHL commissioner Gary Bettman after emerging from a two-hour Board of Governors meeting just before 2 p.m. today.

"Out of respect for that process, I'm not going to say anything more."

Bettman also did not take any questions before departing the Manhattan hotel board room. A meeting between a group of NHL owners and a group of players is expected to commence soon as optimism continues to reign that there may be a resolution in the offing to the NHL lockout, which has been in place since Sept. 15.

Contract language and the so-called "make whole" issue are thought to be at the centre of the dialogue. Pittsburgh owner Ron Burkle and star Penguins forward Sidney Crosby, along with Mario Lemieux and agent Pat Brisson, were credited with getting talks moving in a new and positive direction on Tuesday.

Given how much of the past two months has been marred by rhetoric, leaks and name-calling, the fact that neither side isn't saying much may be a very good thing.

"We feel good about the information we got," said new Columbus president John Davidson after the board meeting. Leaf minority owner and chairman Larry Tanenbaum said: "We're going to keep talking up until we get a deal."

The owners-players meeting, again without Bettman and NHLPA boss Don Fehr, is expected to begin about 2:15 this afternoon. The same six owners - Burkle, Larry Tanenbaum (Leafs), Mark Chipman (Jets), Murray Edwards (Flames), Jeff Vinik (Tampa) and Jeremy Jacobs (Bruins) - are again involved.

 

 

Comments

Perhaps those who have been following this closer than I can explain something? Damian works for the Toronto Star and negotiates his salary to be $1 million per year, why would/should he care where and how the Toronto Star generates the revenue to pay him? Why this concept in hockey and other sports of the 50-50 split of revenues. There is a cap in place, so the owners cannot pay more in any one year that the cap. They decide how to split the cap amongst the 23 players on their team. Please clarify for me why the players should care about anything other than what they have agreed to?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

The Spin on Sports by Damien Cox


  • Damien Cox, the Star's hockey columnist and associate sports editor, takes turns stirring up trouble and chuckling at the foibles of the sporting world. He'll start with hockey, Canada's ongoing passion play, and stick his nose into a few other games and places where athletes reside. You'll love some of his thoughts, hate others and get a chance to give your two cents on all of them.

Recent Comments