Connect with Facebook | Login/Register
 
collapse Site map

« Luminato clues in: No 'each hand' this year | Main | Auction uptick? Joyner's records big dollars in Spring sales »

05/27/2009

The Grange Prize; huh?

Marco_antonio_cruz1

The second Grange Prize was awarded last night, to Mexican photographer Marco Antonio Cruz.

It's more or less impossible to criticize the selection, as, American-Idol style, Cruz was chosen by We The People, over the course of a lengthy online voting process. And frankly, I wouldn't want to; while the conceptualism of the Canadians in the field -- the provocative coolness of Lynne Cohen, or the quirkily sombre work of Jin-me Yoon -- are more my cup of tea, Cruz's straight documentary work, on a school for the blind, is accomplished and engaging, to be sure.

What I do feel I can criticize, however, is the Grange Prize itself. Its mandate, apparently, is to engage the public in a dialogue about contemporary photography, which, by way of the voting process -- 20,000 strong -- I suppose it's done.

But the institution itself is a puzzlement. Sponsored by the AGO, we have Canadian entrants, which is good; so we should. But it seems, in its second instalment, that the model is for the AGO to go hat-in-hand to whatever national tourist board wants to use the gallery as  a promotional vehicle. Hence this year's field of Cohen, Cruz, Yoon and Federico Gama -- 2 Canadians, 2 Mexicans. Why? Because the Mexican government chipped in the $50,000 purse.

If the Grange were awarded amid a field of contemporary Canadian photographers voted on by the public, then it might make a little bit of sense; or, if the prize were awarded amid a truly international field, then okay. But choosing photographers exclusively from a country simply because their government sponsored it is, on the one hand, bizarre, and on the other, transparently tokenistic.

Grange Prize 2010 will intermingle Canadians and photographers from France. What can we expect from Grange Prize 2011? The best of Canadian and Belarussian photographers, or Canadians and Luxembourgians? No disprespect to the fine photographic communities that I'm sure exist in those places, but really, the Grange Prize, much like the AGO itself, feels just that random. In some ways, it's a perfect marriage; but that doesn't make it a happy one, does it?

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf8f353ef011570a9a868970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Grange Prize; huh?:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Agreed, Murray -- I've puzzled over this one myself, over that randomness that produces "opportunities" at TO institutions -- but often ones without direction or focus.

To this extent, the Grange Prize can seem like a bit of an elaborate outreach project.

I think the winner was a surprise for most of us in the Can Art field but it's a good wake-up call too -- at least for me -- to remember other contexts and communities for photography beyond the ones I'm usually familiar with


Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Untitled: Contemporary art in Toronto and beyond



  • Murray Whyte covers visual arts for the Star. He's also a feature writer for the Saturday and Sunday Star. He has written about art for the New York Times, Canadian Art magazine, the National Post and many others.