moneyville wheels healthzone parentcentral yourhome tdc
Connect with Facebook | Login/Register
 
collapse Site map

« Online Ads: The benefit (Part Two) | Main | Confessions of a debate pundit »

04/15/2011

Negative-option marketing

Jennifer Lees-Marshment

Jennifer Lees-Marshment is a world-wide expert in political marketing who was visiting professor at McGill University in 2009, and who has conducted research and published on Canadian political marketing.

 

I’ve interviewed several advertising consultants who have worked for political parties around the world and devised attention grabbing pol ads in elections.

Whilst we know negative ads are common in politics, what they told me was that for them to be successful, they need to fit certain rules:

1. Reinforce views by using advertising that simply and clearly expresses existing views and emotions
2. Use advertising to reach people less interested in detail
3. Utilise negative advertising, but carefully, with humour

The Liberals recent ad ‘it’s time to stop the Harper gravy train’ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qi86pDt30D4) fits these rules. Firstly, although it’s negative, unlike previous attack ads from both sides which could alienate anyone other than core supporters, it is humourous, using carnival type music and showing cartoon type trains, which gets the message over but in a much darker way, making it more accessible to floating voters. You can feel comfortable watching this critique of the prime minister.

Secondly, it uses facts/figures but in catchy way – so tells people the detail of the problem in simple ways, but it is also legitimized by the use of numbers.

Thirdly, it reinforces existing views because the issue of potential mis-spending by the government for the G8, which has already been covered by the media and so is already in public consciousness, and tied to official rebuke from auditor, so legitimate and believable.

This is effective negative advertising.

But even then it can only get a party so far. What it can do is open voters minds to the possibility of taking their vote away from Harper.

The Liberals still have to then give voters a reason to buy their product instead. So what the Liberals have to do now is offer a clear, positive alternative. This could then change the course of the election.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Shopping For Votes


  • Who's buying and who's selling in the political marketplace? Can votes be won using the tools of business and shopping? Canada's political-marketing experts give their analysis of developments and trends in politics.

    Meet the Shopping for Votes bloggers

Recent Comments